mr. harrington said, that takes us closer to cost of service. the cost of service assumption assumes adding back or restoring the city-loan renewals, coastal are sf, city efficiencies. your key bookends are two-sent status quo that allows us to be financially sustainable, or 4 cents, to allow us to have all of those same things, as well as add that the public our program to its previous level for city renewables, energy efficiencies. again, a similar graphic or the satisfying of the reserve policy, not falling off of the financial cleiff. the overarching impact of the summary, the same departments that were highlighted earlier. what it would mean for the municipal railway. one additional penny in their costs would be $1.3 million. that is on a billion dollar-size but it, so it is a far the small%. only about a fraction of a percent. two pennies the following year would be $2.6 million, only a third of a percent of their budget. similarly, i know that you are reviewing public health budget as well. $600,000 of cost. is such a small portion of the

mr. harrington your work at puc really shines

mr. harrington, and all of you.ant to thank you because you help us continue to work in michael's name to do good for the city. for 32 years, i have done that, and i feel it is a real honor to do it. i tell you and i certainly have told michael throughout the years, whether or not we talk to citizens about what we are doing and we are, when they say that we are with the sheriff's department working with the public utilities commission, i have never ever gotten a bad response from any of the citizens. what they usually say is, "michael hennessey is a good guy." and with the puc is doing is obviously a good thing. i appreciate what you're doing. michael gave me a job april 15, 1980. with that job, i feel i have been able to help others get what i have gotten -- a way to work, a place to work, and a place to be proud to be able to be working. i would like please, it's the -- if the earth stewards would please stand up, because i speak for them. [applause] i speak for them and i will speak quickly to say that we are pro

mr. harrington your work at puc really shines supervisor mirkarimi, your work on the budget committee has been just fine i think it is time we looked ahead, we looked ahead and not behind you are riding on the back rows of the river of my puc memory and it is ever gentle on my mind i am so glad that you gave it the time i know that budget money is money that is awfully hard to find and i know i am glad you made it all through the city budget grind you are riding on the back roads, the rivers of my memory and your budget puc is gentle on my mind i know it is not just another line i know that you are going to look ahead and not behind and it is time we looked ahead and we are going to find more money this time and we are riding on the back roads to the rivers of my memory and your budgets ever gentle puc on my mind on my mind supervisor chu: thank you. are there other members of the public that would like to speak on item 9 or 10? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, on item 10, can we filed this item? we will file this item. item nine, let us not act on this yet. we have a se