mr. henderson. so i don't understand why is something going on with my case with mr. erson in that department? i don't know. i would like to know from behind mr. davis saying that if something is going on, i don't know. is there an investigation, i'm not sure what is going on. going back again, next month my son as anniversary is happening of his murder and still seeking support of media coverage about his homicide. please do something again, thank you. >> >> thank you, ms. brown. >> this is the end of public comment. it looks like sfgovtv.org is down. can we take a five minute break so i can discuss that with them? >> sure. >> thank you. >> >> >> please stand by... >> >> >> >> >> call the next item, please. >> discussion regarding sfpd's plan to increase police presence and drug enforcement in the tenderloin (discussion & possible action) >> thank you. >> thank you, commissioners. i'm going to start off by giving the high level of what we are doing in the tenderloin and address many of the issues that have already been discussed tonight. really this goes to the open a

mrs. kaywood and director henderson raised it? mrs. kaywood said this is a one where we are able to meet with the sme and exchange ideas and come to agreement but pending since april 2020. what is the hold up of that- >> (inaudible) part of what needs to happen with this particular policy, there is a manual at the department that needs to be revised as well. the policy in the manual has to be done concurrently. that just makes sense. there is much to be done. the policy-- (inaudible) review the policy and give a recommendation as to whether or not changes need to be made. prior to the policy being approved by the chief of police and going to the commission or approve to be forwarded to the commission for approval. this policy (inaudible) a lot of work, so it was sent back and it came back again, still needed revision and sent back. also, it had to be married with the field training manual and first go-round was not a part of the calculus with marrying the policy with the training manual. we have to do these at the same time because the

mr. henderson are you here? >> good morning. i'm standing in for director henderson. we are in agreement with the board's recommendation. i want to thank everybody for their work on our budget. >> supervisor ronen: to the controller, please note we accept the budget with the b.l.a. recommendations. wonderful. now we're going to move into those departments that are in agreement with the technical recommendations but not necessarily the policy recommendation. starting with the planning department. >> our recommendations for the department of city planning are summarized page 8. recommended reduction totaled $247,701. $53,000 are ongoing savings these reductions will allow increase of about $1.7 million or 2.7% in the department's fiscal year 22-23 budget. our policy recommendations totaled $4.2 million in fiscal year 22-23, all of which are one-time savings. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget totaled $53,000 in fiscal year 23-24. of that amount, all of which are ongoing saves. our understanding, we have agreement on the technical recommendations but we do