mr. herrera has to say about the same issue. this court has characterized the rath of way rights granted to telephone companies as a limited right. the right of telephone corporations to construct telephone lines in the public rights of way is not absolute. that's from page 18 of his brief. mr. herrera's entire brief is filled with discussions of article 25 and 27, and he says on page 35, that the two are equivalent to each other. i suggest to you that you really don't want to be on the wrong side of what the california supreme court hands down having the information -- having a record with the information that was given to you and the california supreme court going in the way that the city attorney, mr. herrera, is urging them to go. so what i would propose is that you do something like this. either put this on hold, this request -- my request for rehearing until you hear from the california supreme court. if we lose, then we're completely out. if the city loses, we're not going to -- you're never going to see us again. it is t