mr. herz? mr. kroeker? >> as it relates to -- >> there's a provision in the reform regulations that are pending that allow, where was disallowed before for investigative information between the united states and foreign, we're not an issue that. mr. goelzer is that taste of our palm with e.u. budget he indicates it doesn't take care the problem with china. do you recognize there may be a problem for china and you have any helpful hints? >> yes. for one i agree, and a second provision that could be helpful is a provision that is in the house regulatory reform bill on section 106, sarbanes-oxley that would give us a greater ability to subpoena workpapers form foreign auditors. that would be of assistance as well as. >> what exactly es it allow you to be she and if they don't respond to our subpoenas? >> it allows great access, as i understand it, in serving a subpoena, a then enforcing a subpoena for more, access to foreign papers. >> very good. >> if i can make ne brief additional point. i do want to be clea

mr. herz? mr. kroeker?> as it relates to -- >> there's a provision in the reform regulations that are pending that allow, where was disallowed before fr investigative information between the united states and foreign, we're not an issue that. mr. goelzer is that taste of our palm with e.u. budget he indicates it doesn't take care the problem with china. do you recognize there may be a problem for china and you have any helpful hints? >> yes. for one agree, and a second provision that could be helpful is a provisionthat is in the house regulatory reform bill on section 106, sarbanes-oxley that would give us a greater ability to subpoena workpapers form foreign ditors. that would be of assistance as well as. >> what actly does it allow you to be she and if they don't respond to our subpoenas? >> it allows greater access, as i understand it, in serving a subpoena, and then enforng a subpoena for more, access to foreign papers. >> very good. >> if i can make one brief additional point. i do want to be clear tha