mr. hollister in designing this. i have had a very minimal -- it will have a very minimal impact on the neighborhood was still providing a service that at&t wants to provide in the area and needs to provide to close certain service gaps. i am here to answer any questions you may have. i am asking for your approval today. if you have questions about frequencies, bill ham it is here. his firm prepared the report that was prepared by the department of public health. >> thank you. i would like to open it up for public comment at this time. you have three minutes to speak. thank you. >> i am totally against this. >> can you state your name for the record? >> jamie hannah. i have a beautiful bay window right there, and that is the one room i live in. franklyfrankly, i do not trust e frequencies or what ever is going on in the little inside it contraption. i do not know what is going on there, but i certainly do not want it to be me in my home. i want to mention in it because in the letters, it says something about if you d

mr. hollister could comment whether they have come to the table to help the neighbors understood the issue. >> commissioner, aaron hollister, i am not aware of the building ownership seeking out members of the public, but perhaps at&t can discuss that. >> commissioner moore, i have spoke within the c.e.o. of the hospital several times and as late as yesterday afternoon, she had meetings to set up with the community members to explain the hospital's use of data and they are in negotiations with at&t on this site. commissioner moore: and that puts us in an awkward position because we don't basically go behind the discussions in a neighborhood together that they need to have on their own. we don't do that and don't saying we approve and have the meetings later. and the recommend ed any individual issue particularly when it comes to the language difficulties and the understanding of the subtle, technicals, and other things is discussed by those people who are having the application and is not for us to resolve. and i suggest you go home and have that prior to us sitting here and lacks the publ

mr. hollister, is to also give the public full explanations about your preference sites. like your preference cites one, two, three, four which pertain to locations where instilling antennas and locating and tennis are preferred over residential buildings were we're getting pushed back. dislike a memo to the public pose -- just like a memo to the public on the website would help all of us to ease concerns. state what the rules are as we are using them, and it would keep us all more informed about how you are recommending to us. an explanation would help to elevate the discussion. thank you. commissioner antonini: i agree. i think this project meets all the criteria that we have to look at when we are evaluating whether or not to approve, and i am supportive of it. however, although it is not on the subject, the speaker did mention about the absence of pay phones in city hall. it would be nice, you know, if there was one. i mean, not everyone has a cell phone. there are people who might be isolated from communication now that there are no more payphones in many buildings.