mr. howard. mr. howard's known me my entire life, quite literally. i'm going back to early in the conversation where you talk about trust. and i'd like to focus on media and news for a moment, because what we're talking about is rebuilding institutions. and with consolidation, news media as well as the withering away local print media, our ability to communicate and create trust in communities, is dying on the vine. and so how can we either rebuild that reconstitute? i mean i'm not sure how we get there, because if everything from universal disney or, quite frankly, the new york times, there is no local accountability. right. it is a very good question. i think there are two problems. one, there is a consolidation of big media. it is lose for newspapers and are a challenging business model because advertising is sort of largely disappeared. but, you know, the problem is not just that there's a consolidate is that there is a balkanization. so now what you have is for four nuts on either side. you know, you have media that only talks to you know, they'

mrs. howard. >> thanks. i want to say i'm grateful for you and your staff because this detail is one of those things i'm not a very detail spreadsheet makes me sweat. thanks for all this. i have just a couple questions. on page 4 of your slide deck, it says tida total expenditures $4.75 million. in 2023. i think that's is 4.75 under budget. >> thank you. sorry that was a tipo. >> just wanted to make sure i wasn't reading that wrong. had a question about the page 8 and the tida operation and maintenance and how different is that then personal and admin and the admin it looks like on this one doesn't match what the spreadsheet number, but can get into that later. just curious like what falls under the operation and maintenance and i think we just saw what that is because it got moved over the park stuff and all that . curious if there is more detail on that. >> sure. sorry, are you looking at operation maintenance line of-- >> looking at the authority cost personal and admin. i assume that is tida personnel an

. >> ooh, this look is a slay, mrs. howard. it's giving grade a baddie >> well, period to that.your gators, because we are going out tonight 'cause mama looks good, baby [ laughter ] >> seth: please welcome back to the show, sheryl lee ralph, everybody! [ cheers and applause ♪ [ cheers and applause ♪ >> seth: welcome back! [ cheers and applause >> thank you >> seth: mama looks good in the clip mama looks good here >> oh, god, i love you >> seth: it's just wonderful >> thank you very much >> seth: i mean always, always looks fantastic. >> thank you >> seth: i'm so glad to have you back, and i'm so happy to have "abbott elementary" back this is season three, delayed. >> oh! [ cheers and applause >> seth: the delayed gratification. >> absolutely. >> seth: everything was shut down because of the writers' strike >> that's right. >> seth: and then s.a.g. strike. it must be so lovely to be back with this wonderful cast and crew of people >> oh my god you know, it was so interesting. all of that time off, which was necessary. >> seth: yes >> the strikes were worth it >> seth: absolutely

mr. howard had some chinese wall thing that i didn't think worked at all. where allegedly those cases were properly redacted. that ended up being a joke. so the five cases really turned in to i'm not going to say all 101, but a vast majority. that is the work that mr. bradley and mr. campbell did for me. they did a really good job. all of those cases that we originally came with, they're done. they're not just done for mr. bradley land mr. campbell. they're done through my office. life is not stagnant. there's been new police cases. i have a lawyer that is doing that work now. that doesn't work for me. that's same kind of deal. i have another lawyer that does filtering for this case. completely separate. >> so in the same private office, you had a filter contract, then you had somebody else having pedalling first appearances and so forth and then a special prosecutor. is that correct? >> i'm just not -- ultimately the answer to your question is question. but i'm not sure that they did it at the same time. the first appearance contract, even 60 or $90. i don

mr. howard had some chinese wall thing that i didn't think worked at all where allegedly those cases were properly redacted, that ended up being a joke. and so the five cases really turned into i'm not going to say all 101, but a vast majority. that is the work that mr. bradley and mr. campbell for me, they did a really good job. all of those cases that we originally came with their done those cases are not just done from mr. bradley and mr. campbell. they're done through my office. but obviously life is not stagnant. there have been new police cases. i do have a lawyer that is doing that work now that doesn't work for me. that's same kind of deal i have another lawyer that does filter in this case completely separate so in the same private office, you had a filter contract, then you had somebody else >> having handling first appearances and so forth, and then you had a special prosecutor. is that grit? >> i'm just not ultimately the answer to your question is yes, but i'm not sure that they did it at the same time. the first appearance contract was either 60 or $90. i don't know really h

howard, and mr. schmidt, secretary schmidt, in your experience, when you have substantial turnover as a a result of threats against election workers and board members, as we have seen in georgia. tremendous stress and uncertainty associated with a rapidly changing election law? those changes, mr. schmidt, by the way, in georgia, based largely on conspiracy theories about voter fraud. when you have that kind of turnover among election workers and when you have the reconstitution of election boards, what's the practical impact on the ministration of election? >> is a very dangerous dynamic, senator, because when you have this experience, people leave and they are replaced with others with less experience. . those news people are more likely to make a mistake. as i mentioned, it's perceived in a way that's intentional and malicious and partisan and trying to sort of help or not help some other candidate which only feeds these sort of accusations to undermine confidence in elections. i want to add one ot

mr. howard had some chinese wall thing that didn't think worked at all, where allegedly those cases were properly redacted. that ended up being a joke. and so the five cases really turned into -- i'm not going to say all 101 -- but a vast majority -- that is the work that mr. bradley and mr. campbell did for me. they did a good job. the cases are done, not just done for mr. bradley and mr. campbell, they're done through my office. obviously life is not stagnant. there have been new police cases. i do have a lawyer that is doing that work now that doesn't work for me, that's same kind of deal. i have another lawyer that does filtering for this case, completely separate. >> so in the same private office you had a filter contract, then you had somebody else having -- handling first appearances and so forth. then you had a special prosecutor. is that correct? >> i'm -- i'm just not -- ultimately the answer to your question is yes. but i'm not sure that they did it at the same time. the first appearance contract was either $6 0 or $90, how i convinced them to take that. i think it was such a

mr. farley, ms. howard, both of you mentioned the importance of federal funding . how it is important to election administration security. i really appreciated two words -- mr. farley, we did a lot of work on this with paper ballot, also with cyber protection and the like. can you both talk about the importance of federal funding? for elections. >> we are replacing dre's with verified voter paper audit trail, that is a great resource for funds we had. anytime you can fund needs, whether it's state provided or federal funding is a good thing. a lot of times, up until recently a lot of times, elections were not a priority. at a state level, i think anytime we have funds, we have to make sure that we have to be good stewards of the funds, put into good use all of the voters in our jurisdiction. >> ms. howard, the two tennis peep -- tennessee people at the end? >> i think federal funding is critical, we have seen the huge transition across the country from paperless voting machines to now, such as in mr. farley's county to paper-based voting systems which is critical. i

we will go right across, aguilar, howard, then wexler. mr.aguilar: senator, it is very difficult to list anyone that has the most promise. i can cite several examples were we successfully solved everything from violent crime to property crime using a number of ai tools. i think that the greatest threat comes in the absence of sound policy. that applies to any tool that law enforcement uses. so, again, sometimes, we may think of ai as something new and a challenge we have never faced. but the reality is, law enforcement has for many years had access to sensitive information through drivers license databases, criminal records, and, it is that policy around those systems that really safeguards the public. the same can be said for other tools we use. weapons, vehicles. we do not rely on manufacturers to write our deadly force or driving policies. i think the absence of policy would pose the greatest threat and i think congress should be looking at a number of very tools that right now are making our communities safer. dr. howard: the only ai enab

howard. this new ad, it aligns with this op-ed in the wall street journal and that's were carl rove says to win team biden's only one option and all out attack on mr contrast, howard, from another recent op-ed in the new york times. frank bruni writes, too much trump toll could create the impression president putin doesn't have enough accomplishments to put centrist age. i'll ask you who's right, which one do you think is the winning strategy? >> i don't think either one is right. i think taking advice from pop it columnists in any paper is a big mistake. i think biden is on exactly the right track. trump is a danger to the united states. if you were to let our allies go, our economy would be in very serious trouble. if there were a war in europe, which seems to be what his advocating, that would destroy our trip relationships with our most powerful trading partner, which is the eu. american jobs will be. lost this is the guy who doesn't know what he's talking about. so i think this and is important. and i think it makes the right point. >> okay. what about the democrats who are celebrating that big win for tom suozzi? this was and to say special

um, miss howard, yes. mr. oh, mrs. dunlop, sorry. thank you. um, yeah. um, thank you for the brilliant or splendid in detailed presentation. there's a lot here. and uh, just like to, uh, first off, thank the staff. i mean, we have an incredible staff that does amazing things. and for, you know, we're almost like a city of our own. and yet our staffing isn't anywhere near what the staffing is with the city. and which sort of, uh, jumps together with what? um, the director, uh, was saying about the, you know, the expenses and all. you know, we have a huge, huge rec and park department, but do they help us out very much? are we participating with them? do they want what do they give to us? because we're not a separate city. we are san francisco and we really need to work with all the other departments. and i'm not sure how much we do or don't, but certainly as far as money goes, it doesn't seem that we participate all or they participate all that much in our our work and our parks and our maintenance. and i think that's a really important aspect that, uh, t

howard university. this is my week of panels. i'm enjoying it. we know who mr. wilson is and who his relative's. we are happy about that. i want to bring in mr. lawrence to talk about this. you were in the classroom for 30 years. you've been in education for 45 years. i'm staying on this longer than i should because i think this issue of school and teacher diversity is very important. having a diversified school. would you like to weigh in? >> i absolutely would. first of all, you can't be what you can't see. so if you are not represented, in the classroom as a teacher or in the school as an administrator, how does a young person see themselves becoming successful, becoming a leader? so what i've seen is, school has to be a welcoming place. if it's not, dr. bell fans from baltimore said, by the third grade, students have decided whether the school thing is for me or not. it makes a lot of sense to me that we need to frontload our resources. we need universal pre-k. we need all-day kindergarten. we need resources at that level. at the end of the day, we need to educate -- we need education and no