mr. hurley is a line prosecutor. we never make line prosecutors available. that is every attorney general i know has followed that policy. mr. cunningham no longer works in the justice department, so i don't have the ability to compel him to testify. he left the justice department this past monday or friday. >> you asked him to leave, i guess, didn't you? >> no. >> you didn't? >> no. >> he left on his own after he took the fifth amendment? >> he had planned to leave well before he invoked his fifth amendment privilege to take a job in private practice or at a private company. >> i understand the ig has 80,000 documents and you've given us 6,000. whether we're talking about 93 or 80,000, this committee has asked for those and has not gotten them. it appears as though we're being stonewalled and there's something that's being hidden. let me ask you another question, have you apologized personally to the whistleblowers who were, in effect, called liars by those within your own agency when we now know they were telling the truth? we wouldn't know any of this toda

mr. hurley is a line prosecutor, and we never make line prosecutors, um, available. that is every attorney general that i know has followed that policy. mr. cunningham no longer works in the justice department, so i don't have the ability to compel him, um, to testify. he left the justice department, i think, this past monday or -- >> you asked him to leave, i guess, didn't you? >> no. >> oh, you didn't? >> no. >> he left on his own after he took the fifth amendment? >> he had planned to leave well before he invoked his fifth amendment privilege to take a job this privacy practice, or a company. >> as i understand it, the ig has 80,000 documents, and you've given us 6,000, so whether we're talking about 93 or 80,000, this committee has asked for those and has not gotten them, and it appears as though we're being stonewalled, and there's something that's being hidden. let me ask you another question. have you apologized personally to the whistleblowers who were, in effect, called liars by those within your own agency when we now know they were telling the truth and th

mr. hurley is a line prosecutor and we never make them available. every attorney general i know has called that policy. mr. cunningham no longer works in the justice department and i don't have the ability to compel him to testify. he left the justice department this past monday. >> you ask him to leave, i guess. >> know. he had planned to leave well before he invoked the fifth amendment privilege to take a job in private practice, or at a company. >> as i understand it, the ig has a 80,000 documents and you have given us 6000. whether we are talking about 93,000 documents or 80,000, this committee has asked for them and has not gotten them. it appears as though we are being stonewalled and there is something being hidden. have you apologized partially to the whistle-blowers who were in effect called liars by those within your own agency, when we now know they were telling the truth, and that we would not know any of this that they had not come forward? i am talking about people like john dodson who is here today. >> i have not apologize to them. i h

mr. hurley is a line prosecutor and we never make them available. ery attorney general i know has called that policy. mr. cunningham no longer works in the justice department and i don't have the ability to compel him to testify. he left the justice department this past monday. >> you ask him to leave, i guess. >> know. he had planned to leave well before he invoked the fifth amendment privilege to take a job in private practice, or at a company. >> as i understand it, the ig has a 80,000 documents and you have given us 6000. whether we are talking about 93,000 documents or 80,000, this committee has asked for them and has not gotten them. it appears as though we are being stonewalled and there is something being hidden. have you apologized partially to the whistle-blowers who were in effect called liars by those within your own agency, when we now know they were telling the truth, and that we would not know any of this that they had not come forward? i am talking about people like john dobson who is here today. >> i have not apologize to them. i hav

hurley who rules on the case. and what you are about to see is the most unusual ruling of what mr. be out of jail by 3:00 today and he will stop by somewhere. he will get some flowers. now hold on. hold on. he will get a card. he will get flowers. and then he is going to go home, pick up his wife. get dressed. take her to red lobster. after, that they'll go bowling. >> bob: can i suggest his wife pick up a 12-gauge shotgun on the way back home? i guess this is serious, but have you heard a ruling like this before? >> kimberly: in the olden days judges used to do this type of thing. that's how you settle it. now people are aware of the seriousness of domestic violence and abuse that occurs to women. this is inappropriate. the guy is out of line. first, he hit her. that is not good. second, i don't like red lobster. did it on a date and didn't work. >> andrea: you wore flats. didn't work out. >> kimberly: it was a one-timer. i tried to go in our shoes. bowling -- they told me you can't bowl in that. it's a liability issue and you have to wear used elf shoes. >> bob: you have taken th