mr. irving. if we miss telegraph hill dwellers that is unfortunate. there have been community meetings, and it just seems generally like we are usually pretty quick to dial in with telegraph hill dwellers or the supervisor's office. also, our superintendent has been the one to meet with both appellants over the last few months. again, i want to be clear that there was no directive from someone related to park renovations to get out there and approve trees for removal. whenever there's a project as you know, it is important that we don't finish 90% of evaluating a site and then leave street trees unattended to. when the street gets repaved, we do not want to hear two years later that someone wants to replace the water main. those are the conditions for us doing out there. there are concerns raised about whether or not proposed tree removals and ficus, at large meet sql requirements and we do have sql clearance through the 2014 urban forest plan which accounted for anticipated the need to remove trees at the outset of our implementation event. at this.h