mr. james chavy submitted 150 word summaries also and his remains as an addendum through december of last year. and their statements that they put it in the addendum and then noted in the thing that has changed, that has been so many variations, if you go back through and look through the notes, sometimes it was a blue numeral i, as he mentioned you had to click on that and once you clicked on that you could see my comment but you could not get back to the rest of the minutes. >> my question is if they adopt this, going forward n spite of all of your complaints about the past, i want it know whether this cures the problem that you believe existed? >> no. >> and the reason is that if you look at the two cases i'm talking about, mr. chafy's comments are listed as a summary of his comments provided, mine is listed as a statement read by. which is not accurate. i did read the statement, but that is not all that i said. and up until this set of minutes, they would add additional comments. they would put additional comments before me 150-word summary or after the 150-word summary or sometimes b