mr. jensen -- development by mr. jensen and his signature appears on the documents. i would request that you deny the appeal and allow our project to move forward. we are in construction and any delays will result in a delay in the delivery of this project to the community who deserves it. thank you. of clarification. when you're going through the list of scope for the permit, the actual permit application also includes landscaping. i did not hear that in your list. >> my understanding is landscaping is exempt from permitting for the permits are related to buildings, accessibility issues, items, and retaining walls over 4 feet in height. i will perhaps -- perhaps mr. duffy, commissioner richard and can respond to that. -- reardon can respond to that. president hwang: thank you. mr. sanchez. >> the subject property is located within a public zoning district. while it is unknown historic resource, it is not an individual landmark. it is not required to have a review from the historic preservation commission for the modifications. given that it is in -- not in a p distr

mr. jensen, who was very careful about looking at our plans, which is unnatural -- none natural design for the park. it is going to be an unusual redesign for the park. he was there a excited as were other folks in the presentation. it was interesting how his review brought up several things about accessibility that were incorporated in our plans that we were happy to do so. the park and recreation commission thought very highly of the overall scheme and the playground design in particular. the design was vetted through numerous meetings that were announced in the neighborhood and held at a neighborhood facility. i think everything was done to outreach to neighbors. good from my point of view, a project of this source i have been involved in in the past, and other public parks, buena vista park, lafayette park, and other projects i have been involved with, there is always a degree of disagreement in these parks canno, and i think we areg last vestiges of disagreement with lafayette park. i would encourage you to set aside a disagreement, what the project go ahead. there has been quite a lo

jensen? >> south dakota. >> speaking from south dakota, speaking to the amended amendment. >> would mr. kobach agree to changing or just removing the word "proposed"? does it have to be proposed legislation? >> or we could add the word "the." is. >> mr. kobach s there specific proposed legislation on that now? >> these are all great ideas. we can take out proposed if you don't like the rhyming. i really don't -- i just want to get the idea in here. [laughter] >> the move that "proposed" be struck. all in favor of that amendment say aye. >> aye. >> all opposed say no. the okay. that clarifying amendment is adopted so we don't rhyme. [laughter] now, we've got to act on this, folks. i think you know what this is about, and we have to act. last comment, mr. stearns from virginia. >> sorry, i don't mean to be, you know, too into the detail here. the capacity of clips, i'd like to offer a friendly amendment changing clips to magazinings. >> that's already concern. >> oh, it's done? my apologies. >> it's been moved and seconded that the question be called to end debate on con amendment number

jensen? celtic woman speaking to the amended amendment. >> what he agreed to change a gorgeous removing the word proposed does it have to be proposed legislation >> or we could add the word the proposed. >> mr. kovack is there a specific proposed legislation? >> it has been proposed in congress. we could take out proposed if you don't like the rhyming. [laughter] yes, i would agree. >> the move that proposed. all of those in favor of that amendment, aye. all opposed, say no. that clarifying amendment is adopted so we don't rhyme. [laughter] we've got to act on this vote because i feel you know what this is out. last comment, mr. stearns from virginia. >> sorry. i don't mean to be too into the detail. the capacity of clips live like to offer a friendly amendment changing clips to magazine. it's done? i'm sorry. i just got in the room. my apologies. >> the question be called to end the the date on the constitutional amendment number 11? all in favor of the motion, say aye. all opposed, no. now the question is on whether or not constitutional amendment 11 should be agreed to. all in favor of adopting the amendment, see aye. all opposed, no. the amendment is agreed to. and i believe that this t