mr. jensen -- development by mr. jensen and his signature appears on the documents. i would request that you deny the appeal and allow our project to move forward. we are in construction and any delays will result in a delay in the delivery of this project to the community who deserves it. thank you. of clarification. when you're going through the list of scope for the permit, the actual permit application also includes landscaping. i did not hear that in your list. >> my understanding is landscaping is exempt from permitting for the permits are related to buildings, accessibility issues, items, and retaining walls over 4 feet in height. i will perhaps -- perhaps mr. duffy, commissioner richard and can respond to that. -- reardon can respond to that. president hwang: thank you. mr. sanchez. >> the subject property is located within a public zoning district. while it is unknown historic resource, it is not an individual landmark. it is not required to have a review from the historic preservation commission for the modifications. given that it is in -- not in a p distr

mr. jensen, who was very careful about looking at our plans, which is unnatural -- none natural design for the park. it is going to be an unusual redesign for the park. he was there a excited as were other folks in the presentation. it was interesting how his review brought up several things about accessibility that were incorporated in our plans that we were happy to do so. the park and recreation commission thought very highly of the overall scheme and the playground design in particular. the design was vetted through numerous meetings that were announced in the neighborhood and held at a neighborhood facility. i think everything was done to outreach to neighbors. good from my point of view, a project of this source i have been involved in in the past, and other public parks, buena vista park, lafayette park, and other projects i have been involved with, there is always a degree of disagreement in these parks canno, and i think we areg last vestiges of disagreement with lafayette park. i would encourage you to set aside a disagreement, what the project go ahead. there has been quite a lo

mr. jensen. >> my name is al winerobe, coordinator of the clean energy alliance and one of the advocate organizations that organize the suggest on the letter of 25 signatories calling on clean power sf to be implemented, and specifically with an interest in the economic development and jobs that will come from this. so i just -- i want to speak specifically about francesca vietor and vince courtney because i know their work better but i want to preface this by saying that the contract that was just signed is for 30 megawatts. the city's load is something like 800 megawatts. when we talk about clean power s we talk about that local build-out program, that economic development and jobs. and that's extremel extremely it for the people of san francisco, not only because it's the jobs and economic development, but local greenhouse gas reductions, certifiable, and it is actually the avenue for reducing electric bills. because when you own assets and do energy efficiency and when you build your own stuff and know its financials that's how you reduce the price of electricity for customers. what that means is

mr. nils jensen. he is a senior traffic planner working with strategies and planning in the traffic department of copenhagen. he is educated as a landscape architect starting his career in the danish cyclist federation in the late 1970's, has worked with cycling research projects at the danish technical university, has conflicted to national danish cycle planning and has been involved in european union projects on zero and low-emission vehicles as well as cycling benchmarking. he has been the coordinating of a car-free cities conference and another conference in copenhagen. nils. >> i'm very happy to be here today and i'm going to talk about planning for a wide range of users, not just for the strong cyclists. i'm not too familiar with this. it's very easy. just keep to the right. in our cycling policy, we present a starting point for the policies for cycling, what we call the transport quality and we are looking at safety, of course, which are the statistics, but we also very much looking at the sens

mr. metrick presented dr. jensen he is a friend of dr. disagreed with h her and couldn't have said it much stronger. she is trying to say that you can't fall and hit your head and lose consciousness and that is not the case. you can think of a simple slip and fall on a sidewalk there is always people who lose consciousness. >> this isn't a sidewalk. this is a bath tub. let's assume that she slips and falls. you know, if she hits the back of her head and that i assume is the injury that you say is the cause of the ultimate unconsciousness and drowning how come it is not a deep cut. it just goes through the top layer of skin. >> it goes all the way down to the wo bone basically. >> no, it doesn't. >> it is a sub gallial hemorrhage. there is no is subdural. >> and no arachnoided. >> that is a nice gash on the back of her head. let's keep it simple that is a nice gash. you don't even need a laceration to lose consciousness. the fact that you have a laceration here and you have in the bag tub. we don't have to say forget about dizziness and me

mr. kevin jensen, one of the city's 88 coordinator is to review and approve all our projects including lafayette park to make sure