mr. jocelyn and mr. fry and gone though how to communicate this; right? so in this was we're going to be voting on. >> hey just to add to that what was helpful it is helpful for the staff in particular the environmental review staff to understand the commissions concerns then we can communicate those concerns ahead of time to the project sponsor we're not just reacting to the eir but drafting it ahead of 7, 8, 9. >> 2 will think formally drafted as the historic preservation commission. >> commissioner antonini. >> on the same subject we have situations with the project sponsor or the commission has agreed to the preservation alternative oftentimes the new project isn't not conceptual you're wanting to delineate but sometimes, it's night and day so it's noting other things to throw out to you guys where the projects we're combining the historic elements. >> absolutely understand that's at&t's an issue as a policy on facadeism because they may not agree with the direction the commission is taking so we may want facadeism to save some of the buildings not to

mr. jocelyn do you have project manager or so working on twenty-four hour 7. >> we have technical staff and specifically staff supporting the new efforts that john ram described the special projects team is that what you're referring to. >> there is so much input through our organization what i found and kind of become standard practices you've got people that look after processes full-time versatile doing the work probably the people that accident the work got promoted we all do that some of the things i saw around the small promotions but this is really their job to maximize. >> it's an ongoing process we're, of course fixing things and keith referred specifically to the opportunity that the firm provides us to deeply understand the efficiency and we went live this fall we're starting to aggregate that data and talking internally how to best slice and dies and provided additional opportunity. >> i think my feedback would be in the have a very large organization of '75 people you might want to think about one person to manage the improvements versus having it part of other people's jobs. >