mr. johnson. >> 6 minutes. >> thank you. i'll just start by addressing the last point and again, i just want to make claim on the record how frustrating this situations is. as the gentleman piloted at&t conducted community outreach and a box walk and identified alternative locates and came to the hearing and told the hoff we've identified multiple locations we want you to approve one what the hearing officer could have been done held the hearing open and solicited alleged contempt from the community and made a decision. instead of violation with the state law and the city's rules the hoff denied our application because we didn't apply for multiple location and the director adapted that our permanent application was denied. as we've pointed out the city has granted one hundred and 34 other applications i've read them all never once did those clients ask for multiple location. dpw they changed their policy so i understand when small business from the community says at&t met with us and will tell the hoff we'll, you know, are i

mr. johnson. now, at the time, mr. n identified himself as derek johnson and gave a false date of birth. >> did there ever come a time that he was arrested and prosecuted or was this simply an arrest record? >> he was arrested, at that time, and he was taken to the kohl county jail where we do all of our processing of every prisoner. during that arrest process, he maintained that he was still derek johnson and refused to give any other identifying information, including addresses that were correct. date of birth, social security, basic information that any peace officer needs to complete an arrest report. the officer that made the arrest, advised mr. jonchz several times that he needed him to be truthful about his i.d., mr. johnson refused to do so and still maintained that his name was derek johnson. weighs was issued a summons as derek johnson even though the officer had found a lincoln i.d. card on mr. johnson' person identifying him dorian johnson. >> did he show up in court with that summons or not? >> he did not.

mr. johnson at that time and also wanted to indicate that mr. n ran away and was not really a person that witnessed everything that was going on. of course, we know that is not correct. >> well, mr. johnson, is there any doubt you were there with michael at that moment? >> sir, i did not leave until the last shot was fired, until i confirmed that my friend was not moving, that he was dead. that's when i took off running. >> is there a possibility based on your account of how things went down, do you believe that, say, a dash camera from the police officer's video would change in terms of how things were set up spatially? >> no, the way the officer approached us, if there was a dashcam on his car, all that it would have gotten is me and my friend walking in the street, and that's it. >> because the actual shots fired and michael's death came when he was behind the police car, am i correct? >> his death came from behind the police car, but the initial shot we were on the side of the driver door of the police car. >> what was going through your head

mr. johnson at that time, and also wanted to indicate that mr. hnson ranwayen -- ran away and did not witness what was going on and we know that is incorrect. >> mr. johnson, any doubt you withthere with michael at that moment? >> sir, did not leave until the last shot was fired, until i confirmed that my friend was not moving and he was dead. that's when i took off running. >> is there the possibility, based on your account of how things went down -- do you believe that, say, dash camera from the police officer's video would show what happened in terms of how things were set up spatially? >> no. the way that the officer approached us, if there was a dash cam on his car, all that it would have gotten is me and my friend walking in the street, and that's it. because e. >> because the actual shots fired and michael's death came when he was behind the police car. aim correct? >> his death came from behind the police car, but the initial shot, we were on the side of the driver door of the police car. >> what was going through your head as you are now,

mr. johnson. if the benefits outweigh. >> let me finish. >> -- outweigh the tax money going out, and mr. brown has issued an invitation to everybody in the world to come to his state, it seems that he doesn't want anybody to be hindered, mr. johnson, or am i wrong? >> no. what it means is that i think you want to create -- your support for comprehensive immigration reform which i think is laudable is a recognition that what we need is an immigration system that is designed to maximize the value of immigration that has been happening in the united states -- >> but you have to do it in an orderly manner, and he is not. the governor is not. i know where you're coming from and i know you want a humane policy. but you don't want mr. morones, you yourself do not want a secure border. you don't want to stop the people from coming here. don't you think that's a little -- >> that's what you say, but that's not true. the border has never been more secure. we have more people actually going south than north.

mr. johnson kugd what dpw could have been done is to hold the hearing open and allow for the time to review the additional sites at&t could have submitted more than one site at the outset there was nothing in the process that prevented at&t from submitting more than one and it - the language used the plural in addition the sites that were identified as the box walk if at&t would have allowed the populations the time to review what was being proposed we might not feel ourselves obligated to deny but as argued the state law does allow us to look for a site that is at least butch on the population so we have the populations weigh in on it the hearing officer is left to deny those applications. the applications were properly denied. and again, because our new ordinance requires that any permit that is not final in the effective date of the ordinance should be subject to the new ordinance. i will once again explain we were flu on target to meet the 60 day deadline we give them a chance to talk about this and we gave them an opportunity to weigh in as we were still crafting the order and had a mo

mr. johnson. >> thank you. i'd like to begin by correcting a couple of statements that the appellant made. so the appellant suggested for instance, that at&t did no community outreach then he wanted to conceive is not the case at&t, in fact, connected conducted two walk-through's and wanted people to meet with at&t. we originally property the box on the other side the community opposed that. so then we remailed and noticed we sent and field person out and meet e met with the appellant by attempting a purchase an easement in the driveway and that driveway was two dangerous because it's an active driveway so it seems like it was not a good location. when we looked at the surrounding neighborhood the problem that came once we couldn't put it across the street this was the only location in the neighborhood that satisfied all of the objectives criteria that

mr. johnson. >> thank you. i'd like to begin by correcting a couple of statements that the appellant made. so the appellant suggested for instance, that at&t did no community outreach then he wanted to conceive is not the case at&t, in fact, connected conducted two walk-through's and wanted people to meet with at&t. we originally property the box on the other side the community opposed that. so then we remailed and noticed we sent and field person out and meet e met with the appellant by attempting a purchase

mr. johnson on the legislation he expressed this morning he wanted me to share today is his concern about gaging and the city has been dealing with gambling and there recent companies that are notorious labeling the sweepstakes and we want to see will there be a vesting process for a third party vendor to provide machines to those businesses if a bar goes into an agreement with a vendor who will be the agency that does the vetting process to make sure they're not in a criminal process the sfpd looks forward to have this updated it's antiquated this is an opportunity to make lasting changes in try and step away from gaging and try to create some guidelines to protect young people. one the others concerns are for arcades if they're in a bar like situation to not advertise for young people to be part ever it and have people on the sidewalks soliciting people on the sidewalks. there needs to be an tenant to be checking ids fittings if as the an arcade geared toward a young to make sure they have a background check because of the original scope of the legislation this is a great opportunity to

mr. johnson. i am wondering if you can address the issue that payment isn't made into social security past $110,000 on income and what i have read is that if these people did pay into the social security system over $110,000 like everyone paid and continued to pay no matter what their income is the system would be solved. i am wondering why is that not happening. >> host: thanks for your question. >> beverly raises an important point. social security is facing financial problems. more money is being paid out of social security than is coming in in taxes and by 2033 the trust fund that has been built up is going to be depleted. when that happens, social security is only going to be able to pay 75% of the benefits it has promised. one of the solutions as beverly said would be the raise the payroll tax. we raise the cap on the payroll tax. it is now $117,000. if you make more than that your benefits are not subject to taxes but also not benefits either. so the argument has been well if we were to rai

mr. johnson was not able to meet with us. were several other key witnesses that did get a chance to meet with the fbi and tell their story. mr. johnson is going to be available later on to be able to do that. one of the things that's just so disappointing about this is we've got a situation in which this the community here -- we have a situation in which this community is insensitive to what happens to young african-american males. what occurred here with big mike is just another indication of what goes on around here. we have two other people killed. we have kerry ball who got shot 27 times by the police. officer stood over him and actually fired 7 to 10 shots in his body while he lays on the ground. another case involving antonio johnson who was tased 13 times by the police in two minutes in the city of hazelwood. he died the next day. the situation with big mike is more of the same. we are so glad, re rend sharpton, that you and the national media decided the to focus on st. louis and what goes on here. this is critically

mr. johnson at that time. and also wanted to indicate that mr. johnson ran away and was not really a person that witnessed everything that was going on and, of course, you know we know that is not correct. >> we spoke with johnson's attorney just a few minutes ago. he said today both the fbi and the local authorities have been in touch to schedule interviews with his client, johnson. last night's protests and the police response was covered and captured not only by print media, but also by citizens. st. louis alderman, antonio french. this video another instance in which police presence can appear to be overwhelming. there are reports circulating online right now that riot police are moving in on protesters at the local quick trip. an hour ago i spoke with alderman french who's been documenting the protests. he was standing in front of that quick trip. i asked him what he saw last night and how his judgment was to how the police reacted to last night's events. >> listen, i think since this thing first happened, as soon as the -- even while the bod

mr. johnson. mr. johnson put back on the counter. then he -- michael brown went to walk out.ccording to the police report and the clerk called 9-1-1 and went to the door and said you'll have to pay for those. he gave them back to the clerk, apparently, or gave some back and pushed the clerk against the rack which would institute a strong-armt ed strong-armed robbery. pushing or punching or any kind of physical interaction during the theft of the property is a strong-armed robbery. if he were to take the cigarettes and not physically touch the person, that would be a theft, you know, a minor theft. a misdemeanor theft of cigarettes. once you engage physically with the person that elevates to the felony charge of strong-armed robbery, which of course, is less aggravated that an armed robbery. then he might have walked out. >> is there anything, jim, in the report that says a pack of cigarillos was found on the person of michael brown? >> no. the report about the strong-armed robbery stops with the detective basically saying that he went to the scene of the shooting and he inter

mr. johnson gorugstore anis renew supported by the pennsylvania, like prescription drug programs, we all benefit. learn more at palottery.com. the pennsylvania lottery benefits older pennsylvanians every day. >>> an australian couple at the suogate scndal speaking out the first time.id and wendy acc abandning a baby boy whenthey discoveredhownyndre rning t jsia m had tgt.n a emotional interview they at times struggled to explain their actions and david there sce acowed that he is a convicted sex offender cm agast young girls tat he says both s.>ar of apps ask cor.an have access to people say those shedding 5% of th weight have better blood pressure and physical health factors but more likely to be depressed. experts areot sure why but may loss upteels alistic ioa o g toeceasvoluner colgentst diffel al.ection from hip-hop to heavy thhbikend aret quhr he tebbs. .softtu tnghepind weed hhiou nead la.bahu tlokamcwthed nd somikeer ze a -nde es r, r ar ,ing- sm begin with that line because they were huge fans of "the wizard tenttoefu she was. and she was buried in a white dress, and red ruby sl

mr. johnson. good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the commission i'm tim johnson if the environmental impact report from the san francisco planning department the item is the certification of a financial environmental impact report or eir for the proposed recreational ground water recovery project that is supported by itself puck given the other things a representative of the puc is here and available to provide a brief overview of the plan in this case if you wish >> let's hold off if there's questions from the commissioners. >> with that, a copy of the draft eir certification motion it was published on april 10th of 2014 and the project vicinity were held in san mateo county on may 24th, 2013, and here before the planning department the public comment closed and responses to comments documents was published and described on july 9, 2014. the evaluations of the issues contained in the eir found that the implementation of the project would result in environmental effects that can

mr. johnson. >> so just a couple of points i'll start with the address issue i think everybody on the board a aware at&t applies for the permits it's required to apply for a permittee finish tissues address if a person owns a property there are fictitious addresses that don't technically exist until the permit is granted. the appellant referred to a different location in a grove of trees i understand that is actually more than 3 hundred feet from the cabinet that will make if technicallyly infeasible for the cabinet we appreciate that the appellant has worked this it's rare to have a private project sponsor to offer to work with an easement if we could have placed our cabinet in the easement we certainly would have taken up the offer in this situation. i'd like to briefly address the departments argument again, i want to point out this is a different situation if there's evidence that the location actually impede the public right-of-way. that's not away why the department asked that the appeal be grant and the permit denied the departments position is that there's a series the procedural re

mr. johnson so far working on this and departments that participated we've seen over time situations where something happens or something is perceived in a certain way to recollections are put in place and years good by and it turnout it has unintended consequences we know when it comes to small businesses whether it's entertainment or night life there's a lot of innovations happening and something that maybe back in the past that was causing a problem is now being used in a positive way. we've seen supervisor kim and i and supervisor campos have teamed up to gradually refine the muscone and the awesome restrictions in the mission there was a good reason then but fast forward now you it is a reform item so the same day is warranted so i'm happy to support this. supervisor kim >> thank you i'm going to express my thanks to confederacy and her office for working on this clean up language i mean, i'll ditto what supervisor wiener said i'll add my name it's important we continue to clean up many is of the arcade regulations 40 in our planning code i don't know free go watch but i'll be checkin

mr. johnson and get these grievances addressed in a way that can be effective.t's one thing just to do something. it's something else to be effective in what you do. i want to see the protest effective. >> congressman, the role of the president and the attorney general, obviously attorney generic holder has limited power. he can't tell the governor what to do or come in and change the prosecution. he can't set the grand jury. so from a federal level, from what we have seen so far, what are your expectations? how is this all going to end as you see it? >> well, we have two tracks going here. was the officer criminal in what he did? if so, that's a state issue. did that officer violate civil rights of michael brown? that is a separate and i think a federal issue. i don't see why these things have to be mutually exclusive. these things can go on separate tracks at the same time. and maybe you want to stay the civil proceedings until after the criminal proceedings over but in order to conduct the kind of investigation that needs to be conducted, you don't have to wa

mr. johnson. >> good evening, commissioners. i just have a few points i'll make briefly. the first thing i want want to point out the new ordinance required the department it issue a new regulations within 60 days of the effective date of the ordinance the ordinance became effective on june 27th that 60s dazed expired yesterday without the department issuing the regulations. i'll be the first person to concede it the department has put considerable effort into drafting the regulations with multiple draft and down their utmost to get comments and met with at&t and others. but it's frustrating that the ordinance has been in effective only skwi days and the department is in violation of that. the position that the department has taken is that at&t's permit even though their not evidence whatsoever that the right-of-way should be denied on purely grounds. and i'd like to make a few comments for the record to remind the board how long that permit has been an issue at&t has been seeking this permit for more than 3 and a half years we applied in march of 2011 on march 13 of 2014

mr. johnson, dorian john, with michael brown at the time admitted he and mr. brown had stolen cigarillos. >> allegedly stealing is not an executable offense. >> okay. i agree. but you're now making a different point. you're trying to tell me that's not been disputed. >> why would that officer get out the car and continue to fire shots in him? there was some type of struggle people say happened, but after that michael brown ran away, he was getting shots fired at him, you can't outrun bullets, he turns around and stops. maybe that officer was mad because he wanted to stop in the street and the kid said something that upset him. has that occurred to anyone that people do crazy things when upset. >> both of these men are experiencing this fight or flight instinct and make you do things out of character on both sides. good to see you tonight. >> thank you, megyn. >> michael t. brady also quoted in the trace report you just heard and the "new york times" report also added that the police officer started firing on michael brown as he fled. so that adds something to