mr. kallstrom and his team? they were deeply troubled by what they were doing.nd they did try and speak out at that time reid he is wrong on both of those counts. >> what he might be right about, they waited until they got their pensions before they spoke out. maybe that is true when you see what happens to people today, that they were afraid for their livelihoods. >> i think that was only one piece of it. if you're trying to blow the whistle and you get smacked while doing it, you're not inclined to keep doing it until you retire. >> let's go to a clip of the naval air warfare center responding to the claim and missile could have cost explosion. this is also from the film, "twa flight 800." >> it is possible to several types of missiles could be in the vicinity of twa flight 800 buthe time of the mishap, the possibility that occurred is hard to imagine. >> what about that, tom stalcup? >> there was a report for the ntsb where he says, there is no evidence except there is a hole and left side of the plan that seems if anything it was a missile coming down from a

mr. kallstrom, you say that you believe that trust has been promised for the american people.ou regain that trust? how do we set the system straight? >> by having people that pontificate on television tell the truth. if they can't tell the truth for reasons of classification, then they say so. but, you know, i'm not saying that the ends justify the means in any case, even if the trust of the government was 90%, which it never will be, but it clearly doesn't help to have all these things going on about benghazi and the irs and all these other things. you know, it costs a crooked eye to the whole government. it's going to be difficult to maintain these types of systems -- >> so what -- forgive me. i don't mean to interrupt. you have a problem probably with the line here. what is the truth that you believe is not being said in public that needs to be said? >> you know, i think anybody on the street could tell you that, you know, it isn't helpful to the trust of the government by having, you know, people just not come forward and deal with things truthfully. you know, the irs inve

mr. kallstrom, you did order that cia animation to replace the actual witness testimony. ntsb three weeks before the public hearing on the crash and before it was released specifically requesting the ntsb chairman not allow any eyewitness to come an testify. to date, not a single eyewitness out of 670 your investigators located ever testified publicly on this. why did you hire the cia to create this falsified animation which showed an aircraft climbing which is physically impossible. it's actually impossible based on the radar evidence. if you're going to climb that sharply, that plane has to slow down just like when you ride a bicycle up the hill. the radar data shows no reduction in airspeed. how does it climb? it didn't turn and climb and went down as our animation shows. if you want to tell the world what the eyewitnesses saw, let them testify. that's what you should have done back in 1997. i think you should request that's done right now. >> i'll let you weigh in on that. i'd also like you to quickly weigh in on why would there be a conspiracy to cover this up? >> i