to retain his electronic calendar and that mr. kawa did not violate the sunshine ordinance by failing to produce his electronic calendar to mr. pet trellis. a proposed order for the commission's consideration. do i hear a motion as to whether or not we support the recommendation of the staff? sz >> so moved. >> second. >> any discussion? >> can we break that down into two parts because it is actually two parts in terms of whether or not under the sunshine ordinance laws one would be required to keep the record. . and whether it was actual by mr. kawa. i vote for that as we can interpret it as a motion to amend. >> you want to state your amendment for the record? >> that the retention of mr. kawa's calendar was indeed required by existing law. and i wouldn't go in farther than that. >> i second that as a motion. >> are you withdrawing your motion? >> yes. >> all right. any, i have got to say, i vote against it, but it comes up because i don't understand what it is that you are pointing to. >> mainly what i'm pointing to is the overall c