mr. keating was saying, wasn't he simply saying this. unless mr. murdoch, too, think you're a big, bad bastard, there is no point in thinking you can do a deal with him because he will think you are weak. but the way he operates is by implied deals, by nods and winks. isn't that the message mr. keating was trying to get across to you? >> i don't think so. i think he was saying what he says in that broader context that i've set out in the statement. but i certainly think that the rupert murdoch would have been -- might have been thinking that historically he had had failed businesses with the labor party, it looked like it was going to be labor government, historically they would not have gone after whatever it might have been, so my point was i was never witness to and don't believe there was ever a discussion that said, now, tony, if you do this and you do this and you do this, my papers will back you. it just never happened. and i also think, as i went through some of the issues, tony went through and the government went through these issues on t

mr. keating was saying, wasn't he simply saying this, that unless mr. murdoch thinks that you, too, are a big, bad bastard, there's no point even thinking you can do a deal with him because he'll think that you're weak. the way he operates are through implied deals. isn't that the message mr. keating was trying to get across to you? >> i don't think so. i think he was saying -- what he says in that broader context that i've set out in the statement. but i certainly think that the rupert murdoch would have been -- might have been thinking that historically, he'd have, for obvious reasons, this very, very difficult relationship with the labor party. it looked like there was going to be a labor government. historically our policy positions would in a sense have gone after the murdoch empire, cl weather it was cross media ownership or whatever it might have been. so my point is that i never was witness to and don't believe that anything that was ever a discussion that said now tony if you do this and you do this and you do this, my papers will back you. it

mr. keating's last question and ask that both mr. edwards and mr. moynihan respond to this. from physical year 2010 to the present, i.c.e. opr has received a total of 26,983 allegations of employee misconduct. some involved corruption. while others did not. in any event, this number is extremely high. in addition to investigating these matters, i want to know does i.c.e. opr work with i.c.e. at large and cbp to encorporate lessons learned from these investigations into new standards and procedures and given what you just stated, mr. edwards, having to deal with the budgetary constraints, you know, how does this actually work out when i.c.e. seems to have a whole host of their own investigations to conduct? i mean, i think if you add up all of the allegations together, i don't even know how personnel is able to manage. but that's for you to answer. >> yes, ma'am. thank you for your question. even for oig, the complaints we received in fi 12 so far has been 10,438. nonetheless, i think even before this investigation, this is -- there needs to be an all the components are doing

mr. moynihan for his testimony. >> morning. chairman mccaul, ranking member keating, on behalf of secretary napolitano and director morton, thank you for the opportunity to discuss the ways in which i.c.e. uphads dhs standards for integrity and professionalism. the overwhelming majority of i.c.e. employees demonstrate the highest levels of integrity, perform their duties with honor every day. . however, as in any large organization, isolated acts of employee misconduct do occur from time to time. my testimony today focuses on the mechanisms that are in place to ensure robust process for investigating allegations of employee misconduct and insuring the integrity of the i.c.e. mission. since the creation of dhs, the i.c.e. office of professional responsibility has been delegated the authority to investigate allegations of criminal and administrative misconduct committed by i.c.e. and cbp employees. although we refer allegations to the dhs office of the inspector general for review and potential acceptance, many are referred back for appropriate investigative action. i.

mr. keating was saying, wasn't he simply saying this, that unless mr. murdoch thinks that you, too, are a big, bad bastard, there's no point even thinking you can do a deal with him because he'll think that you're weak. the way he operates are through implied deals. isn't that the message mr. keating was trying to get across to you? >> i don't think so. i think he was saying -- what he says in that broader context that i've set out in the statement. but i certainly think that the rupert murdoch would have been -- might have been thinking that historically, he'd have, for obvious reasons, this very, very difficult relationship with the labor party. it looked like there was going to be a labor government. historically our policy positions would in a sense have gone after the murdoch empire, cl weather it was cross media ownership or whatever it might have been. so my point is that i never was witness to and don't believe that anything that was ever a discussion that said now tony if you do this and you do this and you do this, my papers will back you. it

mr. keating said about the national security positions. >> the acting deputy commission testifying on capitol hill before a house subcommittee chard by michael mccaul, republican of texas, looking specifically at ethics inside the department of homeland security and specifically in the customs and border protection office and some of the issues involving polygraphs, both during the hiring process and during employment. a report last month on the future of social security and the trust fund with this headline from the "new york times," it will run out of money sooner than expected by 2033, three years sooner than projected by the obama administration and medicare and its hospital insurance trust fund will be depleted by the year 2024 and the social security disability insurance program will run out of money sooner than that in 2016. that is two years sooner than originally projected. the social security commissioner michael was on capitol hill talking about this issue and whether or not there is an increase in claims abuse for social security disability payments and the ranking republican on t

mr. keating was saying, wasn't he simply saying this, that unless mr. murdoch thinks that you, too, are a big, bad bastard, there's no point even thinking you can do a deal with him because he'll think that you're weak. the way he operates are through implied deals. isn't that the message mr. keating was trying to get across to you? >> i don't think so. i think he was saying -- what he says in that broader context that i've set out in the statement. but i certainly think that the rupert murdoch would have been -- might have been thinking that historically, he'd have, for obvious reasons, this very, very difficult relationship with the labor party. it looked like there was going to be a labor government. historically our policy positions would in a sense have gone after the murdoch empire, cl weather it was cross media ownership or whatever it might have been. so my point is that i never was witness to and don't believe that anything that was ever a discussion that said now tony if you do this and you do this and you do this, my papers will back you. it

mr. keating's last question. and ask that mr. edwards and mr. moynihan responsiveness. from fiscal year 2010 to the present, i.c.e. opr has received 26,983 allegations of employee misconduct. some involve corruption. others did not. in any event, this number is extremely high. in addition to the investigation of the matter is, i want to know, does i.c.e. opr work with i.c.e. at large and cbp to incorporate lessons learned learned from these investigations were new standards and procedures? given what you just stated, mr. edwards, having to deal with the budgetary constraints, you know, how does this actually work out? when i.c.e. seems to have a host of their own investigations to conduct. if you add up all the allegations together, i don't even know how personnel is able to manage. but that is for you to answer. >> yes, ma'am. that's a great question. even for opr, the complaints we received so far, 12,648. nonetheless, i think that even before these investigations -- this is -- there needs to be -- and all the components are doing the proactive efforts in terms of the

mr. keating's last question. and ask that mr. edwards and mr. moynihan responsiveness. from fiscal year 2010 to the present, i.c.e. opr has received 26,983 allegations of employee misconduct. some involve corruption. others did not. in any event, this number is extremely high. in addition to the investigation of the matter is, i want to know does i.c.e. opr work with i.c.e. at large and cbp to incorporate lessons learned learned from these investigations were new standards and procedures? given what you just stated mr. edwards, having to deal with the budgetary constraints you know, how does this actually work out? when i.c.e. seems to have a host of their own investigations to conduct. if you add up all the allegations together, i don't even know how personnel is able to manage. but that is for you to answer. >> yes, ma'am. that's a great question. even for opr, the complaints we received so far 12648. nonetheless, i think that even before these investigations -- this is -- there needs to be -- and all the components are doing the proactive efforts in terms of the pres

mr. keating said or words to that effect? >> it sounds absolutely what lord keating probably would have said. again, i don't recall the precise language. recording contemporaneously. >> you can do deals with him without ever saying a deal is done. the only thing he cares about is his business, and the only language to restrict -- respect is strength. was that advice given by mr. keating? >> that was his views. you know, as he does, he expressed himself and robust terms. i mean, i came to have a different view myself which was not as simple as that. but, as i say, recorded that at the time, i'm happy to accept it. >> did mr. keating's statement chime with the implied deal which are be cleared to you accept or reject? >> as far as we are concerned. i can't answer for him obviously. as far as we are concerned, absolutely idea rejected. he's used to do with the media. deep than anybody else, either express or implied. and you never saw such slang. so was i aware of the fact that he had certain interests? was i aware that the medi

mr. keating: thank you, mr. chairman. i rise to engage in a col key with the chairman. i -- colloquy with the chairman. i thank the gentleman from virginia for his leadership and his willingness to preserve resources for marine, mammal stranding response in the fiscal 2013 commerce, justice and science appropriations bill. i understand that house report 112-463 will -- the competitive prescott marine mammal assistant grant program is a cost-effective, community-oriented program that works with stranded mammals, enables the collection of data to prevent future strandings and deals with the practical dilemma communities face with beached dolphins weighing 200 to 500 pounds as well as with whales. based on conversations with the chairman and the ranking member, i will not be offering my amendment specifying this grant at this time. i look forward, rather, to working with the gentleman from virginia towards inserting this language in conference and with that i yield back my time. mr. wolf: i want to thank the gentleman from massachusetts for raising the issue and i promise

mr. duncan. >> thank you, ranking member keating if it were servers of the subcommittee.t's a privilege and honor to appear before you today. every day nearly 57,000 full-time tsa employees work to ensure the security of our nation's vast transportation networks. tsa employees risk-based intelligence driven operation to prevent terrorist attacks and reduce the vulnerability of our transportation network to terrorism. our goal is to maximize security while protecting privacy and facilitating the flow of legitimate travel and commerce are a multilayered system of transportation security. tsa's workforce at how bush's security mission by screening passengers and baggage of more than 450 airports in the united states. every week we have 14 million passenger reservation and 13 million transportation workers against the terrorist watch lists. our efforts facilitate the secure air travel for 1.8 million persons each day. the success of our mission depends on the dedication and integrity of our workforce. therefore, everything we do at tsa, from hiring, promotion and training to

mr. goodman, seen here to potentially three decades in jail. phil keatingve outside of the courthouse in west palm beach, florida. phil, what a circus. >> yeah. this is a sensational court case here in palm beach county as you can man, a very wealthy man, founder of the international polo club which is internationally regarded in wellington. he reportedly paid $40 million to the family of the victim already. so that civil case is already done with. but now the juror, dennis demartin, the one who has written this 36-page book called, believing in the truth, is about to walk into this courtroom and be peppered by the judge and roy black has offered several questions for the judge to ask this juror, dennis demartin, basically, demartin is accused of violating blatantly the judge's directive to all of the jurors that they don't conduct any experiments outside of the courtroom, or outside of the deliberations room. that they can only take into that deliberations room witnesses, testimony, and evidence that was gathered during the courtroom. what demartin describ

mr. keating was saying, wasn't he simply saying this, that unless mr. murdoch thinks that you, too, are a big, bad bastard, there's no point even thinking you can do a deal with him because he'll think that you're weak. the way he operates are through implied deals. isn't that the message mr. keating was trying to get across to you? >> i don't think so. i think he was saying -- what he says in that broader context that i've set out in the statement. but i certainly think that the rupert murdoch would have been -- might have been thinking that historically, he'd have, for obvious reasons, this very, very difficult relationship with the labor party. it looked like there was going to be a labor government. historically our policy positions would in a sense have gone after the murdoch empire, cl weather it was cross media ownership or whatever it might have been. so my point is that i never was witness to and don't believe that anything that was ever a discussion that said now tony if you do this and you do this and you do this, my papers will back you. it