mr. mcgee and is for senator kennedy. mr. mcgee: senator kennedy, yesterday you used the words "trigger-happy" in referring to vice president richard nixon's stand on defending the islands of quemoy and matsu. last week on a program like this one, you said the next president would come face to face with a serious crisis in berlin. so the question is: would you take military action to defend berlin? mr. kennedy: mr. mcgee, we have a contractual right to be in berlin coming out of the conversations at potsdam and of world war ii. that has been reinforced by direct commitments of the president of the united states; it's been reinforced by a number of other nations under nato. i've stated on many occasions that the united states must meet its commitment on berlin. it is a commitment that we have to meet if we're going to protect the security of western europe. and therefore on this question i don't think that there is any doubt in the mind of any american; i hope there is not any doubt in the mind of any member of the community of

mr. kennedy: mr. morgan, i suggested that if the united states felt that it could save the summit conference, that it would have been proper for us to have expressed regrets. in my judgment that statement has been distorted by mr. nixon and others in their debates around the country and in their discussions. mr. lodge, on meet the press a month ago, said if there was ever a case when we did not have law an our side it was in the u-2 incident. the u-2 flights were proper from the point of view of protecting our security. but they were not in accordance with international law. and i said that i felt that rather than tell the lie which we told, rather than indicate that the flights would continue -- in fact, i believe mr. nixon himself said on may fifteenth that the flights would continue even though mr. herter testified before the senate foreign relations committee that they had been canceled as of may 12, that it would have been far better that if we had expressed regrets, if that would have saved the

mr. warren's question for senator kennedy. mr. warren: senator kennedy, on another subject, communism is so often described as an ideology or a belief that exists somewhere other than in the united states. let me ask you, sir: just how serious a threat to our national security are these communist subversive activities in the united states today? mr. kennedy: well, i think they're serious. i think it's a matter that we should continue to uh -- give uh -- great care and attention to. we should support uh -- the laws which the united states has passed in order to protect us from those who would destroy us from within. the departmentin of justice in its efforts and the f.b.i., and we should be continually alert. i think if the united states is maintaining a strong society here in the united states, i think that we can meet any internal threat. the major threat is external and will continue. mr. smith: mr. nixon, comment? mr. nixon: i agree with senator kennedy's appraisal generally in this respect. the question of communism within the

mr. kennedy: mr. morgan, i suggested that if the united states felt that it could save the summit conference, that it would have been proper for us to have expressed regrets. in my judgment that statement has been distorted by mr. nixon and others in their debates around the country and in their discussions. mr. lodge, on meet the press a month ago, said if there was ever a case when we did not have law an our side it was in the u-2 incident. the u-2 flights were proper from the point of view of protecting our security. but they were not in accordance with international law. and i said that i felt that rather than tell the lie which we told, rather than indicate that the flights would continue -- in fact, i believe mr. nixon himself said on may fifteenth that the flights would continue even though mr. herter testified before the senate foreign relations committee that they had been canceled as of may 12, that it would have been far better that if we had expressed regrets, if that would have saved the

mr. howe: john edwards has his first question for senator kennedy. mr. edwards: senator kennedy, one test of a new president's leadership will be the caliber of his appointments. it's a matter of interest here and overseas as to who will be the new secretary of state. now, under our rules, i must ask this question of you, but i would hope that the vice president also would answer it. will you give us the names of three or four americans, each of whom, if appointed, would serve with distinction in your judgment as secretary of state? mr. kennedy: mr. edwards, i don't think it's a wise idea for presidential candidates to appoint the members of his cabinet prospectively, or to suggest four people indicate that one of them surely will be appointed. this is a decision that the president of the united states must make. the last candidate who indicated that he knew who his cabinet was going to be was mr. dewey in 1948. this is a race between the vice president and myself for the presidency of the united states. there are a good many able men who could be secreta

mr. kennedy was your question for mr. fleming? >> okay, thank you. john, we have been together and i've gotten to know you and i'm enjoying it. i've heard you in a number of forums talk about the problems and medicare, not medicaid to medicare and social security. i was wondering tonight if you could elaborate on the problems you see in what americans ought to do about it. >> first of all is a proven conservative i want to save and protect social security. everyone has paid into it, everyone who is on it and everyone soon to be on it should have their -- when it comes to medicare runs out of money in nine years. something must be done immediately and again obamacare took $700 billion out of medicare. i have to tell you folks we are going to have to perform spending in washington. look forward to working with my senate colleagues in achieving that. >> i have 30 seconds? >> yes, you do. >> i believe that everybody ought to get medicare and social security they paid for. you want to save money i want to read you some the things the congress has appropri

mr. vice president? nixon: i think so. both senator kennedy and i have ire.had mr. truman's i do want to see one thing, we all have tempers. but when a man is president of the united states or a former president, he has an obligation not to lose his temper in public. one thing i've noted as i have traveled around the country is the tremendous number of children who come out see the presidential candidates. theirmothers holding babies up so they can see a man who might be president of the united states. i know senator kennedy sees them, too. it makes you realize that whoever is president is going to be a man who all of the children of america will either look up to or down to. i can only say that i'm very proud that president eisenhower restored dignity and decency, and frankly, good language and good conduct to the presidency of the united states. i only hope it should i win this election, that i can approach president eisenhower in maintaining the dignity of the office, in seeing to it that whenever any mother or father talks to his child, he can look to the man in

mr. kennedy can what is your question for mr. fleming? >> thank you. john, we have been together in a lot of different forums and i've gotten to know you and i've enjoyed it. i want to tell you that. i heard you in a number of forums talk about the problems in medicare, not medicaid and medicare and social secure the. and i was wondering tonight if you could elaborate on the problems you see what you think americans ought to do about it? >> first of all as again a proven conservative i want to save and protect social security. everyone who stayed in it, everyone who is on it and everyone was soon to be on it should have their benefits. when it comes to medicare, it runs out of money in nine years. something must be done immediately. and begin you heard me say that obamacare to $700 billion out of medicare, accelerating its demise. so i have to tell you folks, we are going to have to reform spending in washington. i look forward to working with my senate colleagues in achieving that. thank you. >> i have 30 seconds? >> moderator: yes, you do. >> i belie

mr. kennedy. >> kennedy: mr. obama thinks he can tax, spend and regulate americans into prosperity. and apparently congress agrees with him because for eight years they talked to him but haven't done anything about it. here's three things i will try to do in the senate. i will pass a ball that says if a bureaucracy opposes a regulation that has a 15 million-dollar impact, congress gets to vote on it. number two i want to pass a law that says the bureaucracy wants to propose a rule that they have to play to three rules they will get rid of. number three, i'm going to require a national regulatory budget where we list all 67,000 of the regulation in the industry to comply with and forth, i'm going to try to pass a bill that would require every rule or regulation to have a sunset provision. . i didn't talk to you in particular but you can use your time later. >> we feed and fuel the nation and it's imperative the next senator takes this call and we have a working coach and we also have to balance clean air and water and transition to the energy of the future. we don't want to be behind

would you have liked joe kennedy? mr. ye: the journalist in me what it been fascinated by joe kennedy. given all that he's been through but more important, his candor. that's what cost in his ambassadorship to great britain when he talked about appeasing the nazis. i think i would've had a fantastic time with them and it would not have liked them. brian: when did you start your research? mr. tye: it took three years of research. i read a lot of things. three years seemed like an endless amount of time. brian: what are you doing now? mr. tye: i'm also running a training program for health reporters, that is why spend most of my time in journalism doing. brian: who do you train? mr. tye: every year we taken a dozen reporters, they come to boston for 10 days of training on issues ranging from public health to mental health. brian: are you already working on another book? mr. tye: i just submitted a proposal for another book. it is never a book until the publisher says it is a book. brian: can you give us an idea of what it is

mrs. angela kennedy. mr. henry kennedy junior. mr. mark lander. ms. angela tomb. sundar puchai. mr.harles ward. mr. michael lombardo. mr. james taylor. mrs. kim taylor. >> we performed at a dinner for chancellor angela merkel. >> familiar. ->> what are you looking forward to? >> it is exciting to be here. >> thank you. ms. cynthia friedman. mr. bill bone. mr. jim chanos. ms. cristal connors. mr. michael pulls key. olski. mrs. tonya ploski. the honorable josh earnest. mrs. natalie ernest. ms. burglary -- maria -- the honorable catherine russell. the honorable thomas donovan. the honorable samantha power. the honorable cass son unstein. >> not a transnational threat. it is nice to celebrate that partnership. thank you. >> mr. david bradley. mrs. catherine bradley. mrs. janet keller. ms. leslie ray. ambassador earth or in cousin -- ambassador cousin. sejas.ador paul mr. khan and mrs. khan. >> is the best thing in the world. thet of all, besides being first lady. -- think the best about it. she pushes the american designers. [indiscernible] >> amazing. she is classy. classic fashion. fa

mr. kennedy, we're going to work with you to get that done. >> thank you mr. ranking member. can i asked one thing? >> sure. >> in consultation with the four prior secretaries of the state, neither secretary al bright or rice used e-mail. they have certified that to us. >> and that's my understanding. i would also note that we rely on the inspector general and there's a report on this and it's very frustrating that the inspector general and in partial and in there to do their job and the only person that refuses to interact is hillary clinton. that's not the fact. she will not cooperate with the inspector general. there's one investigation that we're conducting relating to what's happening here we have other things that booer doing in a bipartisan way. there's one investigation. >> and that's of hillary clinton. >> we were quiet until the fb skpirks when they testified and did not ask the questions, it makes it that there's a job to do. >> i look forward to working with you to get the records. >> yeah, i agree. >> i don't want it to be a one sided investigation. >> i hear you

mrs. angela kennedy. mr. henry kennedy junior. mr. mark lander. ms. angela tomb. sundar puchai. mr. charles ward. mr. michael lombardo. mr. james taylor. mrs. kim taylor. >> we performed at a dinner for chancellor angela merkel. >> familiar. ->> what are you looking forward to? >> it is exciting to be here. >> thank you. ms. cynthia friedman. mr. bill bone. mr. jim chanos. ms. cristal connors. mr. michael pulls key. olski. mrs. tonya ploski. the honorable josh earnest. mrs. natalie ernest. ms. burglary -- maria -- the honorable catherine russell. the honorable thomas donovan. the honorable samantha power. the honorable cass son unstein. >> not a transnational threat. it is nice to celebrate that partnership. thank you. >> mr. david bradley. mrs. catherine bradley. mrs. janet keller. ms. leslie ray. ambassador earth or in cousin -- ambassador cousin. sejas.ador paul mr. khan and mrs. khan. >> is the best thing in the world. thet of all, besides being first lady. -- think the best about it. she pushes the american designers. [indiscernible] >> amazing. she is classy. classic fashion.

mr. kennedy. >> mr. palmer, to the best of my recollection, the laptop in question was not a state department laptop. it was not state department property. and therefore we don't know -- we don't know whether it was personal information on it or not. but also in response -- >> here is the reason we're here, is because she was using non-state-department software, non-state-department servers, non-state-department communications devices, many of which was destroyed. some of the electronic documents were bleached so that they're not recoverable. and you've got a laptop, an external device that's missing, they claim it's lost in the mail, and i want to know if they effort was made to recover it, because it fits a pattern. i can't help but be a little skeptical about what's coming from the state department and from former secretary clinton about their willingness to provide the information that's been requested. >> if i might, sir, the fbi has been turning over additional information that they have recovered

mr. kennedy but is your question? kennedy: john, we have been together in a lot of forums i have very few in a number of forums talk about the problems of medicare and social security and i was wondering if you could elaborate on the problems that uc m1 americans ought to do about it. >> as a proven conservative i want to protect social security. everybody who stays in it and is on it should have their benefits when they care bonds out of money. obamacare took $7 billion so they have to reform spending in washington. >> everybody to pay for social security and if you want to save money i've made the federal budget like the state budget they spencer is massage john beni rabbits and spend with their mother's love dogs as much as kids. >> moderator: that ends this particular round in the next question comes from kelly. with the opportunity with the oil and gas industry the breezy and workers are concerned about friday what which you do to help create the next generation of jobs in the b.c. hana? sinecure is what you need

mr. kennedy, do you have other things? >> i would have document i would like to introduce for the record. a number of advocacy organizations from patrick ken and other advocacies to submit to the record. >> without objection. >> i yield my time to representative kennedy. >> representative kennedy is recognized. >> mr. schrader, you're a good man. let's focus a little bit on a couple more minutes on the reimbursement issues. my understanding, again, mr. selig, we can start there. actually, dr. trangle, we can start with you. particularly issues around medicaid. talk about how low reimbursement rates access the care people are able to provide for the poor. >> i read an this past week i think it was in jama, it did document some variability and how many psychiatrists were participating in what plans. so i know there's data out there nationally of how that plays out. in our area, i don't think -- what we have are psychiatrists that opt out totally and will will take cash only and will take nobody with insurance. it is the bigg

would you have liked joe kennedy? mr. tye: the journalist in me what it been fascinated by joe kennedy. given all that he's been through but more important, his candor. that's what cost in his ambassadorship to great britain when he talked about appeasing the nazis. i think i would've had a fantastic time with them and it would not have liked them. brian: when did you start your research? mr. tye: it took three years of research. read a lot of things. three years seemed like an endless amount of time. brian: what are you doing now? mr. tye: i'm also running a training program for health reporters, that is why spend most of my time in journalism most of my time in journalism doing. brian: who do you train? mr. tye: every year we taken a dozen reporters, they come to boston for 10 days of training on issues ranging from public health to mental health. brian: are you already working on another book? mr. tye: i just submitted a proposal for another book. it is never a book until the publisher says it is a book. brian: can you

mr. kennedy. >> i-year-old my time to congressman kennedy. >> you're a good man. so, let's focus a little bit since i have a couple more minutes on the reimbursement issues. my understanding, again, mr. selig, we'll start there. dr. trangle we'll start with you particularly issues around medicaid. how about low reimbursements rates affect the access of care for the poor? >> you know, i read an article that came out just this past week in "jama" they talked about it, it document some variability there. i know there's that out there nationally about how that plays out. in our area, i don't think we -- what we have our psychiatrists that opt out of the system totally. take no one with insurance. >> generally speaking -- >> general population -- >> generally speaking looking at insurance rates, private reimburses higher than medicaid, true? >> true. >> we have been searching about medicaid's reimbursement rates. cms doesn't compile a national database of what those reimbursement rates are. given the companies you represent and the number of states you practice in, that

when john kennedy was elected president, how old was bobby kennedy? mr. e: bobby kennedy when he became attorney general -- he yearst age 42 and eight earlier when he became attorney general -- he was 36. he was the third youngest attorney general in american history and he may have been the least qualified for that position ever appointed. his qualifications were that his father told his brother to hire him as attorney general. and jack would have defied anyone on anything except for his dad. --by had never tried it case bobby had never tried a case in a court of law. three years later, when his tenure ended with the death of his brother, he may have been the best attorney generals in the modern era if not forever in terms of everything from the war he waged against organized crime and corruption in unions to what he did for the civil rights movement. he may have been the least appreciated. he put meaning into the department of justice. with everything from bail reform to caring about court defendants. he understood that it was more then just chasing croo

mr. kennedy engaged in those activities is wrong. and there are multiple parts in the 302s where mr. kennedy was repeatedly, not just in this one case, repeatedly pleasuring people to change the classification of documents that were under subpoena. nobody should be able to do that, nobody! >> undersecretary kennedy is a career diplomat, he's obviously not part of the clinton campaign right now. do you have any evidence that hillary clinton herself knew anything at all about this so-called quid pro quo? >> no, i don't. to say that hillary clinton directed this, i have no evidence of this. but you have a person who directly reports to hillary clinton. you also have, in these 302s, hillary clinton's own attorneys left their employment at williams and conley, went to work at the state department. you have a state department career employee said that upstairs on the 7th floor, they were operating and i quote "a shadow government." so instead of hillary clinton just opening up, saying i made a mistake, let's get these documents out there, that is not true. her actions were to bring in her o

mr. kennedy. >> in medicaid expansion has been a good decision for louisiana. in addition to the over 300,000 working people that have health care coverage about $184 million is going to continue to save us money. the state matches around 40% when we refuse to take the expansion dollars. for political reasons. it's now falling down to 2.5% and will gradually raise over time. it's estimated the expansion number will provide million dollars annually in economic rivers to our economy and we are making sure working people in the waistband of her attacks dollars home in a future they get coverage. october is cancer awareness month and statistics are 20 for women as a result of the expanded health care coverage have been diagnosed with breast cancer now getting life-saving treatment so we are literally sit in my bringing tax dollars home. >> mr. campbell. >> i have a son named peter to move back to shreveport. he went to lsu. i'm very proud of him. i asked peter what do you think about the affordable care act? if so then they tell you something. it does more good tha

mr. kennedy: airline pilots and physicians have recovery levels over a five-year. that is because they have accountability and a lot to lose. ms. satel: when i was doing it, that was the cocaine era, and there were no medications then. but now, with all of these those junk courts in the criminal justice systems in general. every week, you go over the patient's and you say they are all in jail -- that happens a lot. in the d.c. jail, they detox people. in virginia, they don't. some jails even keep people on methadone, which is very constructive, because you lower your tolerance while you're in again, that you use is a prescription for overdosing. i should be letting you speak. what is the potential for all of these medications that we mentioned earlier in the crystal justice and -- in the criminal justice system? mr. jones: one of the big myths about change is people learning new things, but earnestly -- honestly most change happens when you unlearn the old things first. what the problem is is an old way of looking at addiction. the good old 12-step model, the if yo

mrs. kennedy's eyes, it opens up in theaters, december 2nd. >>> i don't want -- i do want to see that. >> there is some fascination with that family. >> i was just going to say something about kennedy's, absolutely. >> as we turn our focus here talking about the weather, lot of people are still thinking, focusing on what is going on with matthew. thankfully we can report no threat here? thank goodness. >> perhaps some indirect impact which we will get to but lets start off by going outside and show you current path this storm is taking as we track what is still a very strong category three storm, it did actually gain some strength over the last couple of hours and since very last national hurricane center report 125 miles an hour sustained wind speeds still being reported with that potent system. it is speeding up ever so slightly. this will be a very significant concern for not just bohamas ape florida as day progresses. i want to take you out to future weather and show you how things progress with the rainfall. what you will find is notice time stamp starting with this morning, lingering

mr. kennedy. you've been around it long enough. and hopefully you and the others here can shed some light as to how we as a government oversight committee after all, we oversee state and intelligence and others trying to figure out how we can make sure that we avoid those clashes in the future. with that, mr. chairman, i thank you and i yield back. >> thank the gentleman. hold the record open for five legislative days for any members who would like to submit a written statement, will now witness our witnesses. we're pleased to welcome the honorable patrick f. kennedy under secretary for management of the united states department of state. it is proper to address him i believe as ambassador. and my apologies that your name plate doesn't say that. but it should. the honorable janice jacobs is the transparency coordinator at the united states department of state. ambassador, we thank you for being here as well. mr. karin lang is the director of the executive secretariat at the united states department of state. and mr. clarence finney

mr. kennedy has denied this emphatically. or not he actually said this a 302, an fbi memorandum written by an fbi agent said he offered it, we rejected it. some emails now say he never even offered it. look, something like this, i have never seen this in my career, bill -- bill: really? >> an effort is made to change a document after it is evidence in a criminal prosecution. that's obstruction of justice. that's tampering with evidence. that's offering a bribe. why wasn't somebody charged with these crimes by the fbi? instead we learn about this -- bill: so, judge, yeah, judge, so we're clear on this, the fbi says no one was given anything in return. is it a crime to merely suggest the possibility? >> of course it is. it is the offer of a bribe. it is the, it is an attempted bribe. it is an attempt to alter evidence. look, there are often intraagency discussions about whether a document should be marked secret or top secret. these happen every day because the lines between secret and top secret can be vague and you may want t

mr. kennedy or an fbi official who purportedly offered the quid pro quo.lp clarify it for our viewers. >> our viewers, and we looked at this and so did the fbi, that there was no quid pro quo even suggested. i saw the "new york times" piece, but honestly, we looked at this. there was no suggestion of one. there were two conversations. one about the fact that we disagreed with the e-mail classified as secret. the fbi saw it a different way. they won that argument. we did have a conversation with the fbi over some slots they wanted in iraq. those conversations were happening at the same time, but they were not linked. there was no bargain suggested here. >> so what i'm going to do here, this will be a softball because we're usually pushing you against a wall. obviously, there are some that would believe, and i have at times believed, that the state department pressed a little harder because they were trying to protect hillary clinton. that's obviously something the state department is going to push back hard on. >> absolutely. >> i put that out there for peo

mr. kennedy. >> i want my country back that's why i'm running for the senate. i believe america's best days lie ahead but not if we keep going the same direction washington, d.c. is taking us. they've tried to destroy. washington, d.c. will try to raise our flood insurance rates. china, russia, iran now make the rules. i want to be in the senate to try to change that. now when i say washington, d.c., i'm referring to president obama and secretary clinton but i am also referring to the democrats and big government republicans in the united states congress who talk tough but what the president and the secretary do anything they want to do. all of them ought to be ashamed of themselves. i am not a part of the club in baton rouge and i won't be a part of it in washington, d.c.. >> i'm born and raised in denham springs louisiana they've prepared me to be the next united states senator for louisiana the first is my experience as a recent college graduate i worked on wall street and witnessed the second plane hit the tower. the second experience with be working for th

mrs. clinton. kennedy true. >> the problem for republican, and you hear this from senate republicans and even republican election officials in the state, kennedy, is that what you're doing is undermining our entire structure. we can't have voters, and especially hard-line republicans who are skeptical about the system and about voter fraud believe that, in fact, that we, as republicans are participating in this frauchltd and remember, you have republicans already imposing the controversial voter i.d. on a lot of states. so there's been a higher level where people have to show some degree, not always photos but identification before they can vote. well, a lot of republican officials consider that a victory. and now to go backwards, it seems as if what you're doing is saying the entire structure, including republicans are now to be called in question. kennedy: so this is one thing they don't entirely trust, that's electronic voting. i talked to hackers about this. anything that's got a computer can be hacked

mr. kennedy and others for making this hearing. i think that concludes all of our questions. >> i'll take them if we got time. the 9/11 memorial is coming as of now. >> ten business days to submit the questions. the subcommittee stands adjourned. thank you for being here. >> will . >> how do you see that going? >> hopefully well. >> i think one of the important pieces of this hearing, i think from -- was a recognition from witnesses, again, bipartisan, that this is an important part of the reform of the system. and you heard from our republican colleagues that has touched them very personally. i think there's a recognition that more needs to be done. i hope that as companies get familiar with the importance of parity and then, again, what this legislation actually does in terms of not adding additional regulation and to make sure that folks will come around. >> are there -- in the senate looking to when it comes to their -- >> you know, senator warren has filed companion legislation in the senate. senator powell, you know, i think

mr. kennedy: thank you.ciate this opportunity with good friends i greatly admire, and it is so impactful to hear speaker gingrich talk about how this needs to be treated like any other illness. it is so powerful wind van jones talks about how you can think one thing one year and then have a totally different perspective after this is personally affected you. is we just want addiction treated like the disease that it is. that is the endgame. there are lots of things we can do today to help make that a reality so there aren't as many people dying of overdose every year who are dying simply because of our neglect. it is taking time today to put in regulations. people are dying every day. literally today, fda is sitting on the release of medication that can also augment what is available out there for people with opiate addiction people are dying every 90 minutes. this is about a sense of urgency. it is about the fact that as van said, if this were any other illness, they would be marching on washington right no

kennedy. mr. oxman: great ad. eisenhower, whose favorable/unfavorable was astronomically high. he was very popular. obviously it wasn't doctored, it was real. it was not some phony baloney produced advertising that you see now, it was a genuine thing. in terms of defining yourself and defining your opponent, i think the kennedy campaign did that wonderfully and used television, besides the debate -- used television much better than nixon did. in 1960, one of the reasons he lost, famously -- people who heard the first debate on radio thought nixon won, people who watched it on tv thought kennedy won in postdebate surveys. >> 1, 2, 3, 4, five, seven, six, eight, nine. >> 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. >> these are the stakes. to make a world in which all of god's children can live, or to go into the darkness. we must either love each other or we must die. >> vote for president johnson on november 3. the stakes are too high for you to stay home. mr. oxman: talk about defining your opponent. the most famous political ad in t

- cast your vote for kennedy it is up to you, it is simply up to you kennedy, kennedy, kennedy kennedy ♪ mr it's a great ad, really terrific ad. instead of an announcer speaking the copy and saying the message, they put it in a song, and the message was the perfect message. kennedy actually had a pollster, and i don't know whether the pollster actually sat in the room with the people doing the ad and translated that, but i really thought that was a very clever way, making him upbeat, excited, exciting, making him generational, especially against nixon. i thought it was a really well done at. d. the standard unit of television advertising or 30 seconds, these because the tv stations did not figure out they should charge twice as much for 60's as 30's. and so everything in a campaign is about a budget. define yourself, define your opponent, defined the stakes of the election. i think the kennedy campaign did that wonderfully, positively, on him, and also did this -- every republican politician wants you to believe that richard nixon is "experienced." the even want you to believe that he has b

mr. kennedy was looking out for hillary clinton. don't you as an american believe that's a question that needs be answered? >> look, martha, one thing i know from my time in government is that the classification of documents can change depending on where things are. what you heard from this morning from tim kaine was that in his experience in the armed services committee that happens to him all the time. i think one of the things -- >> not usually changed potentially for opening up new fbi slots overseas. that's not -- we all understand that sometimes one department cavalie classifies and another doesn't. that's hillary clinton's basis for that. and the american people can think if that's a legitimate reason. but in terms of opening up slots for fbi overseas as part of some sort of agreement potentially, we don't know if that's exactly, if it was a quid pro quo looks like it might have been. >> we don't know because these are all, all of these documents are coming out because of the russians hacked into the democratic party and they

mr. kennedy was and still is the deputy secretary of state.his happens two years after hillary leaves office under john kerry's watch as secretary of state. asked the fbi to change classified markings on documents. the changes happen all t the difference between top secret and secret is grave damage to national security if released or serious damage. what's the difference between the two. it's subjective. so often the markings are changed so that more people can read the document, but markings are never ever, ever changed after the document has been subpoenaed, after it's in fbi custody, and once it's been accumulated for a criminal investigation because to change a marking then would constitute obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence, and if there is a kid pro quo, i'll give you this tie if you give me that tie, that would never happen here, but if they were doing that then there's an offer of a bribe. now, the state department says the opposite happened. the fbi said, can you get us some more assignments around the world. we are more

mr. kennedy to resign. on what is alleged to be a quid pro quo.ratch the state departments. a recent article in the "washington post" quoted fbi agent on the case who admitted kennedy asked for favors. here's what the gauges that. he said ryan, pat kennedy, i need a favor. i said good. i need a favor. i need are people back in bag that. that was the deal. change the classification on e-mails and slots will open up overseas. the fbi agent turned it down. i said absolutely not. i can't help you and he took that it was fine. that's the exchange. joining us now, mark turner state department deputy spokesperson. good to have you with us. appreciate it. let me start with this. i believe it is illegal to try to change a document when it's already been subpoenaed by a court of law and not so patrick kennedy of the state department wanted to do. i believe that's illegal, sir. >> let's take a step back here. end quote you are reading before going to me. there is no quid pro quo. i can't say emphatically enough. pat kennedy called the fbi and in fact he did

mr. kennedy over at the department of state has been messing with the classifications to keep things outthe public eye, right? >> this enabled her to make the argument that these documents were not marked confidential, secret or top secret at the time she sent or received them. the markings are irrelevant. as the secretary of state she was obliged to know whether the contents were confidential, secret or top secret. >> sounds a little fishy. >> all the best, stevie. >>> meanwhile, you're looking at hurricane matthew hammering the coast of florida. straight-line winds, we're live on the ground coming up next. >>> when the power goes out, what can you do to stay aware of the danger? curt the cyber guy has the best apps for your smartphone. they'd be smart for your phone. >>> hurricane matthew now down graded to a category three, but with 120-mile-an-hour winds the threat is far from over. >> kurt the cyber guy is here with the best apps that you can download right now so that you can stay safe. >> even if you are in this bad weather or you are not, these apps are phenomenal. i will tell yo

evening -- if you don't try to compare george bush to harry truman, i will compare you to jack kennedy. mr. quayle: a dear member of the last time someone tried to compared someone to jack kennedy . mr. gore: harry truman assumed the presidency when franklin roosevelt died here in georgia. only one of many occasions when presidentht a vice into office during a time of crisis. it's time -- and something to think about during the debates this evening. the real discussion is going to be about change for stop bill clinton i stand for change because we don't believe our nation can stand for more years of what we've had under george bush and dan quayle. when the recession came they were like a deer caught in the headlights -- paralyzed into inaction, blinded to the suffering and pain of bankruptcies and people who were unemployed. we have an environmental crisis, a health insurance crisis, substandard education. it is time for a change. bill clinton and i want to get our country moving forward again, put our people back to work, and create a bright for the united states of america. bruno: okay,

fbi agent in charge of handling documents in the clinton investigation was approached by patrick kennedy. mrs. clinton is not the secretary of state at the moment. he's working for secretary kerry. and he makes the offer that catherine just described for us. can you change the marking on this document. >> he was working for us when he's doing that. >> correct. >> he doesn't answer to hillary clinton anymore. >> correct. >> he's supposed to be looking out for us. >> markings on documents are changed all of the time. they're changed so that people at a lower level of security clearance can read documents that they wouldn't otherwise need to be able to read because they need so see what's in there. but they are never ever lawfully changed after they've been subpoenaed and when they've been accumulated as evidence in a criminal investigation. open and it was under that circumstance that patrick kennedy asked this fbi agent to make those changes which of course he refused to make. >> let's say patrick kennedy, again he is neck deep in benghazi. the blame, there was plenty to go around, the absence

kennedy: they want to run for president in 2020, mr. governor fence emerge the victor? the indiana governor schooled him on proper debate decorum. pence was for the most part unflappable. while kaine didn't flop, he was flat and set up a glaring contrast between trump and his robin. trump needs to stay focused, take deep breast, don't react when hillary sets emotional traps. and make fun of and belittle your opponents instead responding to them. >> i appreciate the you are hired, you are fired thing. i think you are running a lot of pre-done lines. kennedy: pence was practiced and prepared thanks to 90-minute blistering sauna sessions with governor scott walker. trump is going prep free before st. louis that's a good idea, right? for trump it's all about the word grounds in the next debate. if he don't decisively win the next debate and make up lost and squandered grounds his campaign is in serious and possibly mortal trouble. let's meet the party panel together. i'm kennedy. so who won the sidekick rumble? mike pence or tim kaine? let's wheel out my fully equipped part

mrs. john f. kennedy.this historic building, each legislative battle reaches its climax and where bills are debated and where senator kennedy and his colleagues both on their merits. where senator kaine 80 -- senator kaine 80 -- senator kennedy -- a marble structure across the constitution from the capital, most committees come all senators, and the vice president maintain their working headquarters. it is here that scores of massachusetts visitors and hundreds of massachusetts letters and telephone calls are received each day in senator kennedy's bustling office. could i ask you a few questions? tell us about some of the interesting objects surrounding you. >> i would be glad to, this is a picture of my wife jackie and my daughter caroline. a picture of former president truman. here we have a picture of former president hoover, i was chairman on the subcommittee of reorganization which consider the hoover recommendations of which we pass 30 in the senate and he expressed his appreciation and it has done a

mr. trump. now congressman joe kennedy explains his endorsement of clinton. >> reporter: it is hard to escape the thought he looks like his grandfather bobby kennedy or even president kennedy. >> joe kennedy is a congressman from massachusetts clearly in the camp. he listened and we asked what he heard. >> concerns about the economy and rhetoric of the campaign and >> reporter: the stop was aimed at getting the minority vote out. kennedy believes they will see more stops and has not given up on ohio. >> and critical time before the election and you see it reflected in the secretary's visit yesterday and amount of tension the campaign is pouring into ohio. >> and flaws he sees in donald trump. >> not everyone is relying on one guy. the fact that donald trump can make things great he won't do it is firefighters, it is school teachers, men and women in uniform and family here giving up their time. >> he is 36-years-old today. spending his entire life steeped in politics. >> it is more divisive and you have seen the rhetoric coming out of donald trump campaign trying to really feed off that divisiven

mr. tye: i had grown up with bobby kennedy as an iconic

mr. buck's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is -- is, you know, to be mildly meritorious, you know, you have a group of factors which i think can -- this court should provide guidance around -- justice kennedy: the state did change its mind with respect to mr. buck's case, and i assume they'll tell us that there's a reason for that. it's not just because his defense counsel introduced it, because that -- that was true in some other cases as well. but if -- if we rely on that too much, won't this discourage prosecutors from offering discretionary concessions? ms. swarns: you know, this is a unique circumstance. i think that -- i don't believe it would discourage prosecutors, because texas doesn't actually disagree with -- and cannot disagree with -- the fundamental problem in this case, which is that it is compromised by racial bias that undermines the integrity of the courts. texas has certainly taken a different position about what it should do about it, but it cannot get away from those -- those core facts that establish that, like no state has an interest in a death sentence that is undermined by racial bias. chief justice roberts: to the -- to the extent it is a unique case, it really d