mrs. kennedy and her family bear. i will do my best, that is all i can do. k for your help and god's. ♪ >> the nation, the world mourns john fitzgerald kennedy. the funeral moves from the white house to the capital, seat of the congress of the united states. ♪ the casson pauses at the capitol steps and from the limousine come mourners, jacqueline kennedy, their children, president johnson and his wife, and attorney general robert kennedy, the late president's brother. beneath the dome of the capitol, the casket rests on a catapult. president johnson places a wreath of red and white roses at the foot of the casket. then mrs. kennedy, holding caroline by the hand, goes up to the casket. the widow lifts the flag and touches her lips to the bronze casket. and then it is the people of america who come to pay last respects to president kennedy. over a quarter of a million stream through the rotunda and many wait as many as ten hours. they wait through the chilly night and not since the death of franklin d. roosevelt have the american people known such deep sorrow.

mr. kennedy: do they know about martin luther king? >> [indiscernible] mr. kennedy: could you lower those signs, please? i have some very sad news for all of you, and that is that martin luther king was shot and was killed tonight in memphis, tennessee. abie: when i was here and listened to his speech, the pendulum of my emotions, i could see it swinging. and it was in a matter of minutes because i think the speech lasted no more than six or seven minutes. but it went from when he first made the announcement, one of anger and revenge and the sound of that -- the collective moans and the sighs. it could not only be heard, but to me, it could be felt. i felt the wave of emotion that came through that crowd. mr. kennedy: for those of you who are black and are tempted to be filled with hatred and mistrust of the injustice of such an act against all white people, i would only say that i can also feel in my own heart the same kind of feeling. i had a member of my family killed, but he was killed by a white man. but we have to make an effort in the united states. we

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. klobuchar, mr. lankford. mr. leahy, mr. lee, mrs. loeffler, mr. manchin. mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, ms. mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, ms. mcsally, mr. menendez. mr. merkley, mr. moran, ms. murkowski, mr. murphy. ms. murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters. mr. portman, mr. reed, mr. risch, mr. roberts. mr. romney, ms. rosen, mr. rounds, mr. rubio. mr. sanders, mr. sasse, mr. schatz, mr. schumer. mr. scott of florida, mr. scott of south carolina, mrs. shaheen, mr. shelby. ms. sinema, ms. smith, ms. stabenow, mr. sullivan. mr. tester, mr. thune, mr. tillis, mr. toomey. mr. udall, mr. van hollen, mr. warner, ms. warren. mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young. >> the minorit majority leader is recognized. administered as soon as possible. >> the proclamation. >> all persons are commanded to keep silent on pain of imprisonment while the house of representatives is exhibiting to statesate of the united articles of impeachment against donald john trump, president of the united states. >> the majority leader is recognized. >> on my behalf and that of the disti

mr. kennedy, mr. kingr langford, mr. lakey, delete, mrs. loeffler, mr. mansion, mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, mystic sally, mr. menendez, mr. merkley, mr. moran, ms. makowski, mr. murphy, mrs. murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters, mr. portman, mr. reid, mr. risch, mr. roberts, mr. romney, is frozen, mr. brown's, mr. rubio, mr. sanders, mr. south, mr. shots, mr. schumer, mr. scott of florida, mr. scott of south carolina, mrs. jean, mr. shelby, ms. cinema, ms. smith, ms. carbonell, mr. sullivan, mr. tester, mr. kuhn, mr. tillis, mr. toomey, mr. udall, mr. ben homans, warner, ms. moran, mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young,. >> any senator who is not in the senate chamber at the time the oath was administered to the other senators who make up that fact known to the chair so that the oath may be administered as soon as possible. speemac the sergeant at arms will make the proclamation. >> hear ye hear ye hear ye, all persons are known to keep silent. there will be imprisonment. speemac articles of impeachment against donald john trump. president of the united states. the

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. lankford., mr. mr. leahy, mr. lee, mrs. loeffler, mr. manchin. mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, ms. mcsally, mr. menendez. mr. merkley, mr. moran, ms. murkowski, mr. murphy. mrs. murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters. mr. portman, mr. reed, mr. risch, mr. roberts. mr. romney, ms. rosen, mr. rounds, mr. rubio. mr. sanders, mr. sasse, mr. schumer.r. mr. scott of florida, mr. scott ms.the south carolina, shaheen, mr. shelby. ms. sinema, ms. smith, ms. sullivan.mr. mr. tester, mr. thune, mr. tillis, mr. toomey. mr. udall, mr. van hollen, mr. warner, ms. warren. mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young. >> a senator not in the senate chamber at the time the oath was administered, to the other senators, will make that fact known to the chair so the oath may be administered as soon as possible. >> the started in arms will make a proclamation -- the sergeant in arms will make the proclamation. here ye. all persons are committed to keep silent. while he house of exhibiting to the senate articles of impeachment against donald trump, president of the unite

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. chloe char, mr. langford worcester marquis, mr. mcconnell, ms. mcnally, mr. menendez mr. merkley, mr. moran, ms. makowski, ms. murphy missus murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters mr. portman, mr. reid, mr. risch, mr. roberts mr. romney, ms. rosen, mr. rounds, esther rubio mr. sanders, mr. sass, mr. schultz, mr. schumer mr. scott of florida, mr. scott of south carolina, missus sheena, mr. shelby missus cinema, ms. smith, missus stabenow, mr. sullivan mr. tester, mr. thune, mr. tillis, mr. toomey, mr. udall, mr. mr. van holland, ms. warren, mr. warner mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young >> any senator who is not in the senate chamber at the time the oath was administered to the other senators we will make that fact known to the chair so the oath may be administered as soon as possible. >> the sergeant at arms will make the population. >> hear ye, hear ye, hear ye, all persons are commanded to keep silent on pain of imprisonment. while the house of representatives exit exhibiting to the senate of the united states articles of impeachment against

mr. kennedy, for five minutes. mr. kennedy: thank you, mr. chairman. mr. chairman, young men and omen enlisting in our military for the first time went to throughout offices our country this year. will reflect days they will sign up to fight for started before they were born. 19 years. in 's how long we've been afghanistan. 7 years, that's how long we've been in iraq. not to mention the american dollars, he american american boots, american lives to yemen, ton sent and many, many globe.orners of our we are a generation that's spent the better part of their life at war in a country in the middle east. perpetual wars fought under the of two permission slips that this body gave the executive branch nearly 20 years ago. . in 2001, congress authorized our offensive against al qaeda and the taliban in the wake of 9/11. in what became the largest armed conflict in american history. in 2002, congress authorized the invasion of iraq in what became the gravest foreign policy mistake of a generation. and our response has been silence. silence from this collective bod

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. klobuchar, mr. lankford. mr. leahy, mr. lee, mrs. loeffler, mr. manchin. mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, miss mcsally, mr. menendez. mr. merkley, mr. moran, miss murkowski, mr. murphy. mrs. murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters. mr. portman, mr. reed, mr. risch, mr. roberts. mr. romney, miss rosen, mr. rounds, mr. rubio. mr. sanders, mr. sasse, mr. schatz, mr. schumer. mr. scott of florida, mr. scott of south carolina, mrs. shaheen, mr. shelby. ms. sinema, ms. smith, miss stabenow, mr. sullivan. mr. tester, mr. thune, mr. tillis, mr. toomey. mr. udall, mr. van hollen, mr. warner, ms. warren. mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young. >> the majority leader is recognized. >> a senator who is not in the senate chamber at the time the oath was administered to the other senators will make that fact known to the chair so that the oath may be administered as soon as possible. >> the sergeant at arms will make the proclamation. >> hear ye, hear ye, hear ye, all persons are commanded to keep silent on pain of imprisonment while the house of representatives is exh

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. klobuchar, mr. langford. >> as the senators sign this document, they're being called by alphabetical order. joan biskupic, what are they signing here exactly? >> they're signing what's officially called the oath book, and every single senator rising from his chair and her chair will come up there and sign this, and that was done in 1999 and it was done back in 1868. this is part -- this is when i said a very scripted affair, and today is mostly script and ceremony as opposed to what's going to happen next week and beyond. but this is where they all come up and, you know, they'll take their oaths as the chief administered it, and just attest to be impartial. >> you know, the interesting thing here is also as our great ted barrett up on the hill points out, that these senators unlike in 1999 where when they signed it they each kept their pen, they are all signing with one pen, and that is because mitch mcconnell really criticized nancy pelosi for handing out pens yesterday, so even on an issue as smal

mr. kennedy. mr. king. this globa mr. langford. mr. lahey. mr. lee. mrs. leffler. mr. markey. mr. mcconnell. ms. nick salley. mr. menendez. mr. merkley. mr. moran. ms. makowski. mr. murphy. mrs. mary. mr. paul. mr. purdue. mr. peters. mr. portman. mr. reid. mr. risch. mr. roberts. mr. romney. ms. rosen. mr. brown's. mr. rubio mr. sanders. mr. schumer. mr. scott of florida. mr. scott of south carolina. mrs. shaheen. mr. shelby. ms. cinema. ms. smith. misstep now. mr. sullivan. mr. castro. mr. tillis. mr. udall. mr. van holland. mr. warner. ms. warren. mr. white house. mr. ricker. mr. wyden. mr. young. >> and there you have the votes. we did not hear any crossover votes there. this is on the motion by the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell to table or set aside the senator schumer amendment for documents. he already has an amendment, a second moment in the pipeline ready to go for witnesses and state department documents. at this photo -- we hear anything. anyone who it was expected to cross over it like it romney, collins, murkowski. this will go along party lines. >> there are

mr. kennedy had a terrible customer service experience with us there were a series of delays in the processt would have frustrated any client. a discussion between a manager and financial advisor about the suitability of a customer in subsidized housing was unacceptable dimon stating he is thoroughly disgusted by racism in any form. a memo sent to employees yesterday saying they have created a team to spur improvements and conducted focus groups with both employees and customers. >> a good friend of mine works there and told me there has been a memo shared admitting short comings. >> this is one of the most recognizable names in america. chase is one of the biggest names out there. does the bank lose customers because of this? it seems like the bank is trying to get ahead of that right now and depends on how wide spread that is. we are talking about that here that does amplify that issue they are trying to get ahead of it if that is the problem, right fully sho so >> that is up about 0.01%. still ahead, twitter ce o's meal prep plan is trending right now. and putting the spot in spotify. we

mr. kennedy. no. mr. king. aye. miss amy klobuchar. aye. mr. langford. no. mr. lahey. aye. mr. lee. no. no. mr. mansion. aye. mr. markey. aye. mr. mcconnell. no. miss mick sally. no. mr. menendez. aye. mr. merkley. no. ms. murkowski. no. mr. murphy. aye. mrs. murray. aye. mr. paul. no. mr. purdue. no. mr. peters. aye. mr. portman. no. mr. reid. aye. mr. rich. no. mr. roberts. no. mr. romney. aye. ms. rosen. aye. >> emily: what you are seeing there is the senate voting on impeachment witnesses. let's go to chad pergram right now. you speak of this is where they to cut standard roll call vote. this was the seminal vote we have been hearing about. a gateway vote about whether or not they would open the door to call witnesses or not. this is a pretty important vote. susan collins from maine and mitt romney from utah, republicans last night announcing they would vote for witnesses. lamar alexander, republican from tennessee last night saying he would oppose it and lisa murkowski saying this morning that she would oppose it. we expect this to go down. what is unclear after this, the senate is

mr. kennedy is recognized for five minutes. i want to say how much i appreciate the input he gave the chair and we will as he said earlier have a follow-up hearing with other state holders and important to start out with our three government agencies, i think that our subcommittee will benefit from the additional testimony of others. he's recognized for five minutes of questioning. >> thank you, >> madame chair. thank you for adding the weight behind this conversation. as some of you know i was hesitant to support legalization. my concerns stem from my work of the health community. many advocates told me they worried about the impact of increase control of the substance. i try to understand how to protect the public health concern is. i talk to experts, i talked to advocates and regulators and some of you. that's where i get frustrated. our federal policies are still rested on nixon's putting marijuana on the same category of heroine. when i ask regulators and agencies how we can make sure this drug like all drugs subjected to

mr. kennedy for the remainder of my time. >> thank you, madam chair. i want to thank you for the time for yielding. this is a critical debate and it is long overdue. our felt system has failed from our criminal justice system to our health care system to our state and local governments that are forced to navigate an impossible landscape. to that end, government officials and elected representatives are important witnesses in bringing an important perspective to this conversation. but there are also critical stakeholders who are missing. those whose lives have been directly touched by our broken marijuana policies. those who have been incarcerated. researchers with expertise yearning to learn more. small business owners find new footing. i'm thankful for the chairwoman who will work with us on a second hearing in this debate. thank you, madam chair. i yield back. >> the gentleman yields back. it's a privilege to recognize dr. bridges, the ranking member of our subcommittee for his opening statement. >> and i thank the chair. i appreciate -- and thanks t

mr. kennedy. >> no. >> mr. king. >> aye. >> ms. klobuchar. >> aye. >> mr. langford. >> no. >> mr.hy. >> aye. >> mr. lee. >> no. >> mrs. loeffler. >> no. >> mr. mancion. >> aye. >> mr. markey. >> aye. >> mr. mcconnell. >> no. >> ms. mcsally. >> no. >> mr. menendez. >> aye. >> mr. merkley. >> aye. >> mr. miran. >> no. >> ms. murkowski. >> no. >> mr. murphy. >> aye. >> mrs. murray. >> aye. >> mr. paul. >> no. >> mr. purdue. >> no. >> mr. peters. >> aye. >> mr. portman. >> no. >> mr. reed. >> aye. >> mr. rish. >> no. >> mr. roberts. >> no. >> mr. romney. >> aye. >> ms. rosen. >> aye. >> mr. rounds. >> no. >> mr. rubio. >> no. >> mr. sanders. >> aye. >> mr. sasse. >> no. >> mr. shots. >> aye. >> mr. schumer. >> aye. >> mr. scott of florida. >> no. >> mr. scott of south carolina. >> no. >> mrs. sheheen. >> yea. >> mr. shelby. >> no. >> ms. cinema. >> yea. >> mz smith. >> mr. stab knnow. >> mr. sullivan. >> no. >> mr. tester. >> aye. >> mr. thune. >> no. >> mr. tillis. >> no. >> mr. toomey. >> no. >> mr. udall. >> aye. >> mr. van holland. >> aye. >> mr. warner. >> aye. >> ms. warren. >>

mr. kennedy, mr. king, ms. klobuchar, mr. lankford, mr. leahy, mr. lee, missus leffler, mr. mansion, mr. markey, mr. mcconnell, ms. mick sally, mr. menendez, mr. merkley, mr. moran, ms. murkowski, mr. murphy, missus murray, mr. paul, mr. perdue, mr. peters, mr. portman, mr. reid, mr. risch, mr. roberts, mr. romney, ms. rosen, mr. rounds, mr. rubio, mr. sanders, mr. sass, mr. shots, mr. schumer, mr. scott of florida, mr. scott of south carolina, ms. shaheen, mr. shelby, ms. sinema, ms. smith, ms. stabenow, mr. sullivan, mr. tester, mr. thune, mr. tillis, mr. toomey, mr. udall, mr. van holland, mr. warner, ms. warren, mr. whitehouse, mr. wicker, mr. wyden, mr. young,. [silence] [silence] [silence] 's. >> the yeas or 53 the nazar 47 the motion is tables. >> the democratic leaders recognized. mr. chief justice i send at to the desk to have a subpoena for jon michael mick mulvaney. >> clerical report. >> the senator from new york mr. schumer poses an amendment number 1287. at the appropriate place in the resolving clause insert the following. section notwithstanding any provision

mr. kennedy of florida, mr. bryant of tennessee, mr. barr of georgia, mr. hutchinson of arkansas, mr. cannon of utah, mr. rogan of california, and mr. graham of south carolina are appointed managers to conduct the impeachment trial against william jefferson clinton, president of the united states. that a message be sent to the senate to inform the senate of these appointments, and that the managers so appointed may in preparation in the conduct of the trial exhibit the articles of impeachment to the senate and take all other actions necessary, which may include the following. one, employing legal, clerical, and other necessary assistence and expenses that may be necessary to pay under applicable expense resolutions or from the applicable accounts from the house of representatives. two, sending for persons and papers and filing with the secretaries of senate on the part of the house of representatives any pleadings in conjunction with or subsequent to the exhibition of the articles of impeachment that the managers consider necessary. with the permission of the senate, i will now read t

mr. kennedy for the remainder of my time. this is a debate that is long overdue. the criminal justice system to the healthcare system to the state and local governments that are forced to navigate an impossible landscape. to that end, government officials and representatives are important witnesses in bringing perspective to the conversation. but there are also critical stakeholders that are missing, those whose lives have been touched by a broken marijuana policy, the people under incarcerated and allowed medical cannabis and researchers with expertise yearning to learn more. they tried to find a fair voting in the industry. i'm grateful for the chairwoman who is committed to working on the second hearing in this debate. thanthank you madam chair and i won't yield back. >> it is a pleasure to recognize the ranking member of the subcommittee for his opening statement. i think the chair and appreciate thanks to the witnesses here today to help advise us in this important matter and i appreciate we are holding the hearing today to discuss the policy. it is of intere

. >> the chairman recognize mr kennedy for five minutes. >> i apologize for bouncing back and forth. thank you for being here for your testimonies. clearly and painfully. rising temperatures and invading species and frequent droughts an extreme when which contributes to historic wildfires and exacerbate climate change and causes that cycle continues until we commit to any climate change. every single day we wait, makes it harder to finally come up with a solution and end it. we can debate the mitigation factors today, but those litigation factor will mean little if you are not going to have an honest conversation. some of our colleagues will say the science is not as clear as i claim it is. in response, a recent-report released a few months ago where warming and drying increase in risk of fire. pentagon released a report a year ago, if we did not address climate change, more than 40 u.s bases around the world will be threaten by wildfires in the next two decades. there are other colleagues that we'll acknowledge climate changes that it is too complicated for too late for too early or

mr. chief justice i sent a question to the desk on behalf of myself, senator is a rich, blunt, kennedy and johnson for the president's council. >> thank you. >> the question for senator sullivan and other senators for counsel for the president. given that the senate is now considering the very evidentiary record assembled and voted on by the house, which chairman nadler has repeatedly claimed the claimed constitutes overwhelming evidence for impeachment, how can the senate being accused of engaging in what mr. nadler described as a cover-up? if the senate makes its decision based upon the same evidentiary record the house stated. did. >> mr. chief justice, senator, thank you for that question. i think that's exactly right. i think it's preposterous to suggest that the senate would be engaging in a cover-up to rely on the same record that the house managers have said is overwhelming. they have said it dozens of times and they have said in their view they have had enough evidence presented already to establish their case beyond any doubt to come not just beyond a reasonable doubt. it's total

from talking t senators and republican staffers across the kill, alex and dra, brawn, gardner, kennedy, lee, mr and, murkowski, porltland, roberts and toomey. these stores have a few things in common. some of them are mo rate, some not, many of them sloated-- voted closely trump-clinton divide and something mo have in common, they have been taking a lot of notes. senatopat toomey of pennsylvania is someone to watch. we know from reporting and source telling me he is trying to have considerations abant witnessetry and get a deal where republicans and democrats each get a wnitness they caive with. but i nt to make sure viewers understand something about the witness discussion, there will be multiple votes on witnesses likely. it looks like there is an opening vote. let's look at a f graphr how this could work. there will be an opening vote on whether to eutn talk abo witnesses in general. no specific witness. and there seems to be growing momentum for that to pass. for that to happen. of wit bees, but judy after that, there would have to be a vote about specific witnesses. do you call jon bolton,

mr. kennedy, no. mr. king, aye. mrs. klobuchar, aye. mr. lankford, no. mr. leahy, aye. mr. lee, no.mcsally, no. mr. menendez, aye. mr. merkley, aye. mr. moran, no. ms. markowski, no. mr. murphy, aye. mrs. murray, aye. mr. paul, no. mr. perdue, no. mr. peters, aye. mr. portman, no. m mr. reade, aye. mr. rish, no. mr. roberts, no. mr. romney, aye. ms. rosen, aye. mr. rounds, no. mr. rubio, no. mr. sanders, aye. mr. sass, no. mr. schatz, no. mr. schumer, no. mr. scott of florida, no. mr. scott of south carolina, no. ms. shaheen, aye. mr. shelby, no. ms. sinema, no. smith, aye. ms. stabenow, aye. mr. sullivan, no. mr. tester, aye. mr. thune, no. mr. tillis, no. mr. toomey, no. mr. udall, aye. mr. van hollen, aye. mr. warner, aye. ms. warren, aye. mr. whitehouse, aye. mr. wicker, no. mr. wyden, aye. mr. young, no. mr. blumenthal, aye. >> are there any members in the senate chamber wishing to change their vote? if not, the ayes are 49 and the nays are 51. the motion is not agreed to. under the previous order, the senate stands in recess subject to the call of the chair. >>> all right. tha

mr. don't lou don "bulls and bears," and kennedy and charles payne will join lou, we'll will see you thursday. for that. but we'll see you tonight, anything somewher special. >> just usual good times. >> we look forward, fox business tomorrow morning we will carry trump -- president trump's davos speech live. and coming up choosing two presidential candidates, we'll tell you who they are. that coming next. at fidelity, online u.s. stocks and etfs are commission-free. and when you open a new brokerage account, your cash is automatically invested at a great rate. that's why fidelity leads the industry in value while our competition continues to talk. ♪ talk, talk while our competition continues to talk. most people think as a reliable phone company. but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. (second man) virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. (second woman) we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all of the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) wh

project at the shorn stein center on media, policy and public policy -- politics and at the kennedy school. mr. justin hurwitz, assistant professor of law and director of nu governance and technology center at the university of nebraska, college of law, and director of law and economics programs at the international center for law and economics and finally, dr. this stab harris, exec -- tristan harris executive director for the center for humane technology. he want to thank our witnesses for joining us today. we look forward to your testimony. at this time, the chair will recognize each wilt for five minutes to provide their opening statement. before we begin i would like to explain the lighting system for those who may not know it. in front of you is a seater of light -- a series of lights. the lights will be green at the start of your opening statement. the light will turn to yellow when you have one minute remaining and if you could please begin to wrap up your testimony at that point, and then the light will turn red when your time has expired. so, ms. bickert you are recognize little for

mr. president, you have to go to berlin. "you have to go for kennedy. you have to go for truman. you have to go for reagan," and he looked at us, and he said, "what would i do, dance on the wall?" he said, "this is a german moment, not an american moment," and i'll never forget that because it was just so much george h.w. bush-- self-effacing, modest, a great sense of humility, and it washe right thing. was absolutely right. rubenstein: you saw him recently. you were at the barbara bush funeral... rubenstein: and did you have a chance to talk to him at that time? rice: i did. i did. a chance to talk to him and tell him how much i love him and loved mrs. bush. they--that's a generation that's going to be missed. thd were people who underst ky and gentility. they made their mistakes, most certainly, att when you think about amily and what george h.w. bush did as a public servan it makes you think of a wonderful time for our country. and in the 1992 election, he defeated your boss. rice: right. rubenstein: were you shocked by the outcome? rice: i was. i'd already go back to stanford

mr. edmonds: it reminds me of the ted sorensen story about when john kennedy was at the wall in berlin, and said ich ben ein berliner, which translated to, i am a jelly doughnut. [laughter] mr. mccall and -- mr. mcconnell, terry and i used to go to these meetings and sorensen would be at the dinners and you could tell that still irked him. there is ahe said magazine called new yorker, and i said to you right now, i am a new yorker, you would understand that i am not saying i am a weekly magazine. [laughter] you could tell it annoyed him. ms. sams: we have a lot of competing voices in the white house. not just the president's. so how did you navigate, particularly in things like the state of the union, special interests and different agendas , that may be might try to creep into a speech. what are the back room dynamics? mr. edmonds: it is different in every administration. president clinton was especially, you know, he liked to gather thoughts and ideas from everybody from his college roommate to first lady, to everybody. and they also had outside advisors, pollsters, cabinet secretaries, e

trade union organizer who is primarily responsible for calling the march tells kennedy they are already in the streets, mr. president, and i doubt if you called them, that they would come back. that's the mood of the moment. that the patience has worn-out. the forbearance, the ability to withstand the clubs and the hoses, the hoses that are so strong they can knock the bark off the tree at 30 feet being fired at children and dogs has become too much, and so african-americans who are always fighting back, start to resist. in birmingham there is eventually they respond to the bombings of the klan with violence, and there's a fear, both among the civil rights leadership and among the kennedy administration that black people would resist and would meet like with like. that's the mood that creates the necessity for a march, which is called in the beginning of the year, but very few people want. the polls show most americans don't want it, particularly most white americans don't want it. kennedy doesn't want it. it is insufficiently radical for many of the youth and too radical for many of the more conservative

mr. philbin. >> a question from senator kennedy and ernst for both parties. thousand managers will be first. if a president asked for investigations of possible corruption, by political rival and under circumstances that objectively are in the national interest, should the president be impeached if a majority of the house believes that the president did it for the wrong reasons. >> the president of course, is entitled to conduct of foreign policy, entitled to look into corruption in the united states, and elsewhere. he's entitled to use the department of state or any other department for that purpose. he is not entitled to target an american citizen. specifically nor did he do so here. mr. biden, an announced candidate for president that he suddenly decided ukraine to look into the bidens. and he made it very clear, that he wasn't interested in an investigation. he was interested in announcement of an investigation. just of the bidens could be spared. so it was probably never, suitable for the president to order an investigation for the american citizens. anything thinks of the general corru

mr. mcconnell's like nope, were moving on. >> why did they need more evidence? they said he is impeached. kennedyotes it pass,. >> so now they are looking for an indictment which is different than a trial. >> and if it was a trial the democrats would've lost a long time ago because it would have been thrown out. kennedy: if tyson days not running the anchor he can't similar run another hundred guys. i'm just feeling it i'm not to hand off the baton. he can't do that he be disqualified. you can't just make of rules. rules rules we have rules. >> they made a miscalculation, well they maybe they didn't and we don't know. maybe john bolton will publish a book in the aftereffect will see all of this. [inaudible] kennedy: a right panel stick around there so much motor discuss. is the u.s. attack on the soleimani justified? and would i war with iran be constitutional? liberal leading centers say hell no. i've got some facts in my memo, that's next. ♪ ♪ so when her car got hit, she didn't worry. she simply filed a claim on her usaa app and said... i got this. usaa insurance is made the way kate needs it

i want to bring in senator john kennedy, republican from the great state of louisiana. mr.his is a very important day. i want to ask you this question. congressman adam schiff, who chairs the house intelligence committee, has complained that president trump did not bring him in to the circle of people who knew about this strike that was going to take place. he was uninformed. he was left in the dark. do you think the president should have informed adam schiff about what he was about to do? >> i think -- i think chairman schiff should fill out a hurt feelings report and let's move on. we've got more important things to deal with here. we don't have a lot of facts so it's important that we concentrate on the facts that we do have. number one, suleimani was a butcher. i'm glad to be able to refer to him in the past tense. number two, i take the president and the secretary of state at their word that this was a preemptive defensive strike. number three, we will be briefed, we meaning the senate, will be briefed next week. it will take probably a nanosecond for the information w

mr. philbin. >> a question from senator kennedy and ernst for both parties. thousand managers will be first. if a president asked for investigations of possible corruption, by political rival and under circumstances that objectively are in the national interest, should the president be impeached if a majority of the house believes that the president did it for the wrong reasons. >> the president of course, is entitled to conduct of foreign policy, entitled to look into corruption in the united states, and elsewhere. he's entitled to use the department of state or any other department for that purpose. he is not entitled to target an american citizen. specifically nor did he do so here. mr. biden, an announced candidate for president that he suddenly decided ukraine to look into the bidens. and he made it very clear, that he wasn't interested in an investigation. he was interested in announcement of an investigation. just of the bidens could be spared. so it was probably never, suitable for the president to order an investigation for the american citizens. anything thinks of the general corru

mr. chief justice, i send a question to the desk on behalf of myself, senators irish, kennedy, and john don> thank you. >> the question for senator sullivan and the other senators for counsel for the president. given that the senate is now considering the very evident area record assembled and voted on by the house, which chairman nadler has repeatedly claimed constitutes overwhelming evidence for impeachment, how can the senate be accused of b engaging in what mr. nadler described as a cover up. if the senate makes its decision based on the exact same evidentiary record the house did. >> mr. chief justice, thank you for that question. think that's right. it's preposterous to suggest that this senate would be engaging in a coverup to rely on the same record that the house managers have said is is overwhelming. they have said it dozens of times. they said they have had enough evidence presented already to establish their case beyond any doubt. not just beyond a reasonable doubt. it's totally incoherent to claim it would be improper for the senate to rely on that record. your judgment may be

kennedy would have had to leave offices first day. it is a hoax, and you understand it better than anybody. it is a hoax. that's the way it is. yeah. go ahead. reporter: mr. president. a question on iran. initially you said repeatedly to americans that after iran retaliated for the soleimani strike, no meshes were injured -- americans were injured. we now know at least 11 u.s. servicemen were airlifted from iraq. can you explain the discrepancy? president trump: no. i heard they had headaches and a couple other things. i can report it is not very serious. reporter: you don't consider a potential traumatic brain injury serious? president trump: they told me about it numerous days later. you'd have to ask the department of defense. no, he don't consider them very serious injuries compared to other injuries i've seen. i've seen what iran has done with roadside bombs to our troops, i've seen people with no legs and with no arms. i've seen people horribly, horribly injured in that area, that war. in fact, many cases, those bombs put there by solemani, who is no longer with us. i consider them to be that -- bad injuries. no, i do not consider that to be bad in

kennedy is for counsel for the president. has the house of representatives in its impeachment investigations or otherwise verified the statement by viktor shokin, that mr. shokin, quote, believes his ouster was because of his interest in burisma holdings and his claim that had he remained in his host, shokin said he would have questioned hunter biden, end quote, as reported on july 22nd, 2019 in an article in "the washington post" entitled "as vice president, biden said ukraine should increase gas production, then his son got a job with the ukrainian gas company," by michael crannish and david stern. >> mr. chief justice, senator, thank you for that question. and the answer to the best of my knowledge is no, the house of representatives did not investigate the veracity, the truth of that reporting about the prosecutor general shokin. in fact, that was part of the point. as manager schiff was saying here again, the house democrats' position is that everything related to the entire incident of the bidens and burisma and what was going on with the prosecutor, it's all debunked. there is nothing to see there. move along. don't ask about it. but they didn't

mr. nichols in your testimony you stated that honey county is almost like a poster child for collaborative approaches. i was wondering if you could briefly explain how high ernie kennedy residents work with federal land managers to collectively solve problems rather than arguing, getting frustrated taking it out on federal land managers. do you have any suggestions of ways this committee can encourage the use of approaches like this more widely? >> yes, i do. we have proved over and over in several different, cases sitting down, talking things through with everyone that has invested interest in an issue has been official to the cause, beneficial to the result, the community and especially the federal land agencies involved. i don't -- over the course of years, things have changed dramatically. we never were an anti government, quote, unquote but there have been and still are things that need to be discussed and looked at. and that goes everywhere, like i, said well across america. during the occupation i got calls, literally, from california and no matter how small the federal land mass was in the state, there were still issues with it. that is not to say it's all bad

i was just given by one of thur republicanof colleagues, senato john kennedy, no relation, said i don't know if mrxpecting today? >> we've heard various responses. i think if they want to figure out if they're telling the truth. there's one way to do it. that's to haul them in. in john bolton's case and actually, both their cases, i think they come in and testify. certainly, i've been saying for all last s week, that we should have the people that were in the room where it happened. i never knew that would be the title of john bolton's book. i have said it numerous times and there it is. i know senator romney made it clear from the very beginning, he thinks bolton should testify and susan collins says this makes a stronger case for witnesses. i do not know, how i will be literally in 45 zblooirngtsd away from them, how they can deny americans a fair trial here., ho they can vote how they want when the evidence comes out. that is up to them. all we're asking is witnesses and you know from listening to the ropresident's lawyers from opening statements they made this clear case, listen to their argum

mr. guliani. >> the senators sought to re-assure president -- >> bret: respect crow continuing the case on the floor. senator john kennedyshort time ago, not a criticism directed at both sides but "view few souls are saved after the first 20 minutes after the sermon." as senator kennedy can only say. we're going to continue many minutes of coverage. you can see it on foxnews.com. we'll take a quick break and be right back. is that net carbs or total?... eh, not enough fiber- chocolate would be good- snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress >> martha: not listening to senator kennedy, it continues to go on. brevity is not just the focus. they still have six some house. this is jason crowe of colorado continuing to speak. let's watch. >> second, remember the supposed interagency process performed by omb? it was fake. and third, after the hold went public and the white house became aware of the whistle-blower, they started scrambling to develop another excuse. public reports confirm this. a no

mr. chief justice. >> senator from arkansas. >> i send a question to the desk for the president's counsel on behalf of myself and senators boozman, sally, blackburn, kennedynd touhy. >> the senators asked the president's counsel, did the house father to seek testimony or litigate executive privilege issues during the months during which it held the impeachment articles before sending them to the senate? >> mr. chief justice, senators. no, they house did not seek to litigate any of the privilege issues during that time. in fact, they filed no lawsuits arising from this impeachment inquiry to seek to contest the bases that the trump administration gave for resisting the subpoenas on the basis for why those subpoenas were invalid. when litigation was filed by one of the subpoena recipients, that was doctor charles government, deputy national security advisor, he went to the court and sought a declaratory judgment saying president told me i should not go and i have a subpoena from the house saying i should go so please, courts, tell me what are my obligations and that was filed, i believe, around october 25, toward the end of october within a few days the cou

kennedy as for the counsel for the president. has the house of representatives in its impeachment proceeding or otherwise investigated the veracity of the statement by former ukrainian prosecutor general that mr. show can believes it was because burisma holdings in his claims that had he remained in his post and he said he would have question hunter biden hurried as reported on july 22, 2019 in an article in the washington post titled as vice president biden said ukraine should increase mass production. then his son got a job with ukrainian gas company by michael cranach and david stern. >> mr. chief justice, senator, thank you for the question and the answer to the best of my knowledge is no, the house of representatives did not investigate the reporting of. and as manager schiff was saying, the houston press position is that everything related to the entire incident of the bidens and burisma it's all debunked. there's nothing to see, move along, do not ask about it. but they did not investigate it. and they cannot point to anyone who is investigated. they cannot point to anyone who has really looked at it. as i said a minute ago, every witness who was asked said that they thought there is a

mr. biden: the context of we saved social security during the reagan administration. everyone from ted kennedyn straightforward from the beginning. we have to increase taxes on people making over $400,000 so they pay the exact percentage of their income as if you are $50,000 or000 or -- $128,000. that will allow it to be solvent for the people in the audience can have anact increase in their social security payment, as well as if they lose a spouse and social security is reduced. that is how we make sure we are able to put everyone is any position where there will be social security for the next generation. >> a bloomberg reporter said the other day, mcconnell told me he hopes to work with the next critic president to -- democratic president to trim medicare, medicaid. mr. biden: there is no bipartisan deal. this administration went after cutting obamacare. asked by theiwas house to stand on the capitol steps as we were leaving office. i said this is about trying to do away with the safety net. this is about trying to get rid of the safety net. i said they will significantly increase the defic