s high representative for foreign affairs has asked mr. kerre here to help narrow differences. so some hinting that there may still be gaps between the two sides decisions but the mood is being interpreted for his till. hvery positively. he was on tv suggesting a draft could be finalized today. so that there is a feeling of anticipation, he's not here yet, i believe he's in israel. that might be an interesting meeting, he's dead set against this kind of deal. but i think we are assuming it's a good sign. >> that said, of course, everything i would imagine pretty finally balanced as these talks get underway a second day of talks or shortly anyway with mutual -- years of mutual suspicion behind these parties, the plus one and iran. and, of course, still fundamental differences between them as well. >> reporter: yes, and i think those fundamental differences won't actually be resolved in this first deal if they pull it off. the fundamental differences remain over what iran's nuclear program will look like in the final phase of this process. this i

obama and mr. kerr, have been moving slowly but surely, not rushing the exit of assad from his position right now. >> rose: and do you think that was part of the reason they pulled back from the attack, that perhaps they can moderate and not rush him out of employer because they fear what will happen if he is eliminated? >> exactly. putin has seen this opening and he immediately, between the united states and syria, and sure enough, president obama immediately grabbed that opportunity and instead of going and attacking syria militarily, he accepted to take the-- havi having-- to take out the chemical weapons of bashar peacefully. >> rose: it is said your government was very much opposed to that because they fear, most of all, iran, and the com compitition with iran for supremacy in the middle east, and it caused them-- because the president took that choice-- to have some reservations about him. >> yeah. if i can summarize to you, the position of saudi arabia and the united states in a very short senten

mr. james kerr and yourself had edited there. you wrote do to issues, the security control assessment was only partially completed. during that conversation, you listed things like unauthorized access. first to identify information. at that point. am i tracking this correctly? >> yeah, those are examples i was asked to provide. >> the problem is that you're trying to mitigate on things you don't know. i understand about mitigating on risk. on day one, marilyn tavier is signing a document saying there are risks out there. >> what you do is under risk base approach look at the probability of a particular risk occurring and you prioritize and for example, one of the mitigation steps was to conduct weekly security testing and to report back to the administrator on the results of that security testing. >> during that testing process, did you find some data was misrouted? once it was launched? are insurance companies getting information that's incorrect? >> there were cases in which insurance company was getting data that were not inco

mr. james kerr and yourself edited there. sissy --emo, due to a two to a system of readiness issue, this constitutes a risk that must be mitigated to support the marketplace day one operations. you were asked by staff what are those risks that are out there that are becoming the unknowns that have to be mitigated. you had listed things like unauthorized access, data, personalize identifier information. am i tracking this correctly? >> yes. those are examples i was asked to provide. >> the problem is, you're trying to mitigate on things you do not know. i understand on risk. you mitigate on things that you know. is that correct? one, signingon day a document that says there are risks that are out there. some that were listed, it's mitigate on those. were we mitigating for every possibility? >> what you do, look at the probability of a particular risk occurring. he prioritize, and one of the mitigation steps was to conduct weekly security testing, and report back to the ministry here on the results of that security testing. >>

mr. kevin kerr, thanks so much for joining us this morning. >> thank you. >> thailand prime minister provides a vote of confidence, but protestors are defiant, demanding a government shutdown. the prime minister is begging the protestors to stop. we are joined live from bangkok. what's next for the protestors now that the prime minister survived the no confidence vote? >> they're not entirely disheartened. protestors say they will continue occupying government buildings that they are occupying until they achieve they are objective of toppingle this government. it's already affecting the day to day running of government. we're standing in one of the offices of the government complex now. inside those buildings, there are several offices including the election commission. we've been told that 70% of the staff are on leave. the protestors are clearly attempting to force some o sortf reaction to the government. they cut power to the main police headquarters earlier on thursday, but the government has not reacted. the police have in fact sought an arrest warrant for the top protest leader. they ob

mr. dempsey? >> thank you for coming to work these issues through with us. professor kerr, do you have any thoughts on this question of review or call its appeal, you've written extensively on appeals in the criminal context of the court orders for surveillance. in the fisa context but there's some interest in creating some process for getting from the judge to the fisa court of review at least making issues available to the supreme court should they take them or not. what are your thoughts in terms of what would be the best way to structure that or could be structured that is at least as constitutional as the rest of fisa? >> it is a good question and a difficult one in part because the constitutional question in large part is on an understanding of the search warrant application process and the ex parte application process which is almost entirely unexplored in the case law. how should we think about application for the ex parte court ordered? is that like a case in which case the exercise of the judicial power in the article three case and controversy way or is that jus

mrs. bush, and ambassador. you have no idea how much your work has impacted afghanistan women. it's a special honor for me to be on this stage. with my afghan role models, afghan leaders today. secretary kerr withry told you about the women of afghanistan who shows him the change that's possible in my country. like many afghan children, i saw the world through eyes of a refugee. i had dreams of my homeland. but my dreams only became a reality in 2002 when my family could finally return to afghanistan. returning home was not easy. we had to make many adjustments. like no car. but we were finally home. my family took advantage of our opportunities and sent me and my four sisters and brothers to school. i did well enough i became an exchange student in california. the move was not easy. i was with a cultural difference. but i learn new things. i had always believed that the young people could make a difference. but i didn't know how. back home, people either believed that you had to do something really big or nothing. i learned from my fellow american students that you could do very small things in the community, like getting to know your neighborhood. it doesn't look big, but in the small co