mr. kleiman in particular. i assume we're running on the assumption that what we'd want to do with a legal market is to diminish the size and the consequences of an illegal market. now, i'm wondering if the extent that some of you suggest the government would directly regulate even through monopoly the business, wouldn't that then create multiple incentives for there to be a black market running concurrently with the federal marketing for children, for people who might want to circumvent the registration and quota regime that you suggest, is i just put that question out there. >> so that, it's a good question. it requires a slightly extended answer, if i may. distinguished between the short run and the long run, right? in the short run, the regulatory system this washington has -- in washington has to compete with an illicit market and with the unregulated, untaxed medical market. and that puts an upper bound on how tight the regulations can be. also seems to me, it puts a premium on law enforcement, right? the