mr. kolchinsky? and then i'll ask mr. siegel. >> i actually never received a formal evaluation as a managing director. but it was very clear to me that my future at the firm and my compensation be based on the market share that was brought in. and that was reiorced inany ways especially with the emails that were sent out at least quarterly and occasionally monthly. i recalled one email that was sent out i believe in october of '07. this was right around the same time3,0 tranches were downgraded by the team that it was questioned our mart share dropped from 98% to 94% and please explain w. it was the mentality whether explicit or implicit that the performance and the future of a managing director in structured finance depended on keeping and maintaining market share. >> mr. siegel? >> mr. chairman, i never found that to be the case during my tenure at rmbs. first of all, the performance evaluation matrix you described sound like they e for managing directors and above the analysts were never evaluated. based on market cove