mr. kumar: absolutely. we are building a significant presence in the country, in bangalore, some of the recent innovations, patents filed from there is cutting edge. mr. haqqani: we don't want to get into the politics but let us just say some people see a difficulty in having -- i mean, everybody is upbeat at the political and strategic level but at the business level i have seen stories that say prime minister modi wants to make in india, president trump wants to do everything in the united states. let me call a -- it may cause a bit of a problem. surely it is a -- there is a win-win available here. what do you see as the win-win? let's just go around with veryone. >> there is certainly rhetoric at i think -- i pay less attention to. and there's work to be done. mr. amarnath: today we are extremely bullish on the ability to deliver in the united states. just to give you a recent example here, on august 1, we'll be inaugurated an absolutely modern, next generation, what we in north perienced -- america. you

mr. sri-kumar: that is a great question. with respect to the climate treaty and the trade treaty, europe seems to be finally coming together. , theave germans possibility of germany and france working together, and in europe, you probably have two europe's with u.k. on the one side struggling with low retail sales and continental europe .uddenly picking up economic signs are more vibrant than they have been for years. haveuestion has been, you two isolated economies, the u.s. and the u.k. and you are conscious of them. tom: this goes to the way a triangle plays out which is euro-sterling. then we get the deutsche bank, stronger euro, is the zeitgeist for weaker sterling? ms. edwards: we've talked to a lot of people who say they are still very vulnerable. for a long time, the pound moved around on a soft or hard brexit but that isn't necessarily the case, it is about certainty and uncertainty. depending on how you view the world and how you view the brexit negotiations, it is incredibly uncertain. shadesou are saying all look

mr. president we thank you for the blessing you have given us to serve your agenda. >> on that, michael schmidt is here with us. reporter for the "new york times." aneeda kumar, white house correspondent for mcclatchy newspaper, and we welcome kimberly attkins, from the boston herald, a lawyer by training we assume she is in recovery from that. welcome to all of you, michael, home field advantage. we'll start with you. back up to the top of your broadcast a little bit of a non-denial/denial from trump even considering firing robert mueller. how would it work? i know he has the ability, the power to do so, it would normally go to the attorney general but for the fact he recused himself on all thing russia. >> it would go to rod rosenstein the guy who played the central role in the firing of comey would now have to make the decision whether to get rid of mueller. some folks say rosenstein would stand up and would resign and would leave himself. but this is the guy who didn't do that for comey. he was willing to go along with firing of comey. he's already down this path. it would obviously create a huge crisis at the justice department. but we thought that firi