mr. larry bush, has provided yesterday a list of other violations of our governing law, which logically could also be a ground for prohibiting participation in public financing. and i have asked mr. paris to examine those, but that's a question for the commission to determine, should it be for other violations of law than violating some part of the public financing law. and, those are meaty questions to think about. and for that reason, i'm inclined to make a motion to continue that until our next meeting. the purpose of that motion would be to ensure staff research with respect to both questions including the issue of including other offences. before making such a motion, i want to ask, what's the advantage of both of these being merged into one, what's the disadvantage? what's the advantage of proceeding with the penalty ordinance i'll dub it, alone, and does that involve legal effectiveness in time for the 1919 -- the 2019 municipal elections. >> chair: i think from a process standpoint we have two options of enacting an ordinance. one is to put it on the ballot. there is currently no june