mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. 3197. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. upton of michigan, i inform the house that mr. upton will vote yea on h.r. 3197. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative jamaal bowman, i inform the house that he will vote yes on h.r. 3197. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by dr. van draw of new jersey, i inform the house that dr. van drew will vote yea on h.r. 319. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from connecticut seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by ms. delauro of connecticut and mr. golden of maine, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 3197. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the ge

mr. lawson and mrd ms. roybal-allard of california, i inform the house that all three members will vote yea on h.r. 5547. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek >> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry votes yes on h.r. 5547. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? mr. pappas: mr. speaker, as the member designated by m mr. cuellar, i inform the house that mr. cuellar will vote yes on h.r. 5547. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. carter: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. taylor of texas, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote no on 5547. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. gomez: as the member designated by mr. harder and ms. savrjz, i inform the house that these -- ms. sanchez, i

mr. lawson, form the house that mr.awson willote yea on hes. 973. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose doethe gentleman from south carolina rise? ms. mace of south carolina and mr. buchanan of florida they will vot no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: fo from virgia rise? gentlen >> madam speaker as the member degned by mr. trone o maryland, mr. keating o massachusetts, mr. doyle of pennlvania i inform theouse thathese memrs wlote a on h.res. 973. the speaker pro temporefor what purpose does the ntleman from ohio rise? >> madpeaker, as the member designated by mr. gonzalez of ohio, i inform t hse that mr. gonzalez will vote nay on the rule. the spker pro tempore: fo what purpose does the gentleman fr north carolinaise? mr. mchelpry: as the member designat mr. luetkemeyer, i form theouse that mr. etkemeyer will vote no on the rule. from utah rise?es the gentleman >> madam speer, as the member designated forr. owens fm utah andr. ctis fm utah, i inform the house that mr. owens and mr. curtisil vote nay on the rule. what purpose ds the ntleman

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson votes yes on h.r. 3113 on the motion to suspend the rules. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, and dr. kim schrier, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on h.r. 3113. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. luetkemeyer of missouri, i inform the house that mr. luetkemeyer will be voting yea on h.r. 3113. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. dean and mr. phillips, i inform the house that those members will vote aye on h.r. 3113. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, home to the

mr. lawson of florida, mr. bowman of new york, and mr. boyle of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that they will vote yes on h.r. 1621. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> texas. as the member designated by mr. tailor of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote yes on passage of 1621. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by dr. gosar of arizona, i inform the house that dr. gosar will vote yea on the measure. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member sanchez, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that congress member sanchez will vote yes on h.r. 1621. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr.

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the amendments en bloc. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bab bin from texas, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the amendments en bloc. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from new hampshire seek recognition? mr. kustoff: as the member designated by ms. delbene, i inform the house that ms. delbene will vote yes on amendments en bloc. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. the 7th district, purpose to house resolution, i inform the house that mr. tiffany will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by the following members, kahele, barra gone, gonzalez, cuellar and ag did you lar, i inform the house the members vote yes on amendments en bloc. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the

mr. lawson vote yes on h.r. 963. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote nay on h.r. 963. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by congress member cuellar and congress member garamendi, these members will vote yes on h.r. 963. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from connecticut seek recognition? mr. courtney: as the member designated by rosa delauro of connecticut and representative golden of maine, these members will vote yes on h.r. 963. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that h.r. 963. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, on roll call number 77 in the secon

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yea on h.r. 5681. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the member from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representatives sherri bustos, yvette clarke and ann kuster, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 5681. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does member from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. veasey of texas, i inform the house that mr. veasey will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does member from michigan? risch as the member designated by mrs. fischbach, i inform the house that mrs. fischbach will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does member from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. buchanan of florida, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote yes on h.r. 5681. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does member from utah? >> as the member designated by mr. carroll of pam, i inform the house that mr. carroll will vote aye on h.r. 5681. the spe

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yea on h.r. 3967. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote no on h.r. 3967. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from georgia seek recognition? mrs. greene: as the member designated by mr. paul gosar of arizona, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote no on h.r. 3967. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, chairwoman -- russ, underwood and strickland, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 3967. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. hudson from the great state of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. hudson will vote yea on h.r. 3967. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from

mr. lawson, i inform the house that m mr. lawson will vote yea on 950 h.res..he speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i inform the house that mr. nehls and mr. carter of texas will both vote no on the bill. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. raskin of maryland, home to the first railroad, the first school -- and the first umbrella factory , as the member designated by -- i inform the house that ms. raskin will vote yes on h.res. 950. i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on h.res. 950. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote nay on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. connolly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. do

the truth is, he is not nigel lawson, mr speaker, he is not nigel lawson, mr speaker, he is ted _ is we buy, make and sell more in _ ensuring that we buy, make and sell more in britain, scrapping business rates _ more in britain, scrapping business rates and _ more in britain, scrapping business rates and replacing them with a fairer— rates and replacing them with a fairer system fit for the 21st century. _ fairer system fit for the 21st century, something that small businesses and high street businesses and high street businesses are crying out for and the chancellor mentioned it not at all in _ the chancellor mentioned it not at all in his— the chancellor mentioned it not at all in his statement today. a ciimate _ all in his statement today. a climate investment pledge to decarbonise the economy, create good 'obs decarbonise the economy, create good jobs in _ decarbonise the economy, create good jobs in every— decarbonise the economy, create good jobs in every part of britain, and strengthen our energy security as wett~ _ strengthen our energy security as well. businesses are seeing

mr. lawson of florida and ms. roybal-allard of california, i inform the house that all three members will vote yea on s. 2629. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 377, the nays are 48. 2/3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and, without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the vote on the motion of the gentlewoman from texas, ms. jackson lee, to suspend the rules and pass h.r. 3359, as amended, on which the yeas and nays are ordered. the clerk will report the title. the clerk: h.r. 3359. a bill to provide for a system for reviewing the case files of cold case murders at the instance of certain persons and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. members will record their votes by electronic device. this is a five-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioni

mr. lawson is now recognized for five minutes >> welcome, chairman, to the committee. as my question or statement, they say one of the benefits of inflation is that you can live in the more expensive neighborhood without moving. >> that's a good one >> i thought that was very interesting, and i thought i would bring it to your attention. according to the recent analysis with the national community, reinvestment coalition between 2017 and 2021, as many as 7,000 branches across this country one-third was in low income and moderate income communities of color. to what extent is it considering these banks as they contemplated reform to implement the strength in the community reinvestment act and the importance that banks play for our nearby communities? >> that's a focus that we want to strengthen in our proposal that's out for comment actually, it's now -- we've had the comments and we're getting a notice of proposed rule making out. i do understand the importance of presence in the community and in service to the community and those things do go two our cra assessments.

mr. lawson has his microphone and we're getting crosstalk. if we can add a few seconds here >> okay. is the gentleman muted now >> i think he is not >> i think you can resume. i'd just like to -- i would like to have a light gavel at the end here, and i think we have cross talk. >> i may have misunderstood. i thought the 40% was money supply, but you made it sound more like monetary policy, so i would -- look -- look, we can discuss those numbers and that makes more sense to me >> point being, has spending contributed to inflation >> yes i think a number of factors have including policy. >> and i would agree with that frankly, many of us have sort of warned or talked about this situation. we have record debt right now, previously without conflict. now war and rumors of war that we hope aren't going to happen may increase that debt and i'm afraid that our spending habits are putting you and all policy decision makers in an even tighter box. look, we all know that inflation is real and it's hitting, whether it's gas at $3.79 versus $2.74 a year ago groceries, you name it housing and wh

mr. lawson has his microphone on yet and if you could add a few seconds back. >> okay. is the gentleman muted now? >> no, clearly he is not. >> i think you can resume. >> okay. i'd just like to would ask that you have a light gavel at the end of my time here. >> yes, yes. >> so, i may have misunderstood. i thought that the 40% was money supply. but you made it sound more like monetary policy. and so i would -- look, we can discuss those numbers, but that makes more sense to me. >> point being, has spending contributed to inflation? >> yes, i think a number of factors have, including fiscal policy. >> and i would agree with that. and, frankly, many of us have sort of warned or talked about this situation. we have record debt right now previously without conflict. now, war and rumors of war that we hope aren't going to happen may even increase that debt. and i'm afraid that our spending habits are putting you and all policy decisionmakers in an even tighter box. look, we all know that inflation is real. it's hitting whether it's gas, 3.79 versus $2.74 a year ago. grocerie

mr. lawson, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on senate bill 658. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representatives kahele, thompson, and chairwoman maxine waters, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on s. 658. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. cawthorn of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. cawthorn will vote yes on s. 658. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. sires, mr. kim, and mrs. kirkpatrick, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on s. 658. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by the following members, chuy garcia, lucille roybal-allard and juan vargas, i inform the house that these members w

mr. lawson, i inform the house that m mr. lawson will vote yea on h.res. 956. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? miss rice: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch, i inform the house that mr. deutch will vote yes on h.res. 956. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by m mrs. kirkpatrick patrick and mr. alibi other -- mrs. kirkpatrick and mr. albio sires, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 956. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey rise? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. donald payne, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on h.res. 956. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. takano: mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative lucille roybal-allard, i inform the house that ms. roybal-allard will vote yes on h.res. 95

mr. crist and lawson of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist and lawson will vote yea on the motion to instruct. as the member designated by ms. roybal-allard of kale, i inform the house that ms. roybal-allard will vote nay on the motion to instruct. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi of illinois, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote yes on the motion to instruct. moti t inst.wil votes oe e speakeproemre: the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. joyce of ohio, form frm mr. joyce -- i inform the house that mr. joyce will vote yea on the motion to instruct. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. thompson of mississippi, want to make a correction in my vote. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, i

mr. lawson is to recognize for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i welcome all of the people to the committee today, and i probably won't, mr. bishop to comment on this. there have been many cases regarding discrimination, discriminatory appraisers from people of color. i remember hearing about a family in jacksonville, florida, was in my district who wanted to refinance their home and pay down the mortgage. when the appraiser came back with a shocking low estimate they decided to get a second appraisal with a new appraisal that made the home appear as if the husband was doing the appraisal. he just happened to be married to a black female, and what they did, they took out all the pictures never everything in the house that would signify that it might be, that it was only a white person included. and all of a sudden the second appraisal went up 40% which is very significant, to go up 40%. mr. bishop, first, what happened in a situation like this if a complaint is filed with an appraisal company for discriminatory, discrimination bias? how is it rep

mr. costa: thank you, dr. stackhouse-lawson, for your comments and points. i think they're well taken. the ability to provide measurements that are understandable and solutions that can achieve those goals are critical toward our ability to manage this and your point about sufficient funding to do a lot of the research that is necessary is something that we should take into account as it relates to the next farm bill and some of the other efforts that are ongoing with legislation. i think your perspective really points out something i like to talk about regularly that i think makes the united states in some ways so different and other parts of the world and that's our land grant university, our agriculture schools like yours, that have played an important role historically in terms of research that has allowed american agriculture over 100 years to really achieve levels of equality and production and best management practices that without that academic involvement i don't think would have been possible. so keep up the good work and our next witness today is a person in her family, rose

mr. costa: well, we appreciate that. finally, dr. stackhouse-lawson, you talked in your testimony about trying to develop ways to more accurately measure issues of emissions and develop strategies that in fact can achieve goals of reducing those emissions. how do you think we best fund that effort in quantifying our data in ways that are meaningful as we try to improve our impacts as it relates to emissions? and what is your university and other universities doing -- and i think we need to be combining resources, frankly, as we try to achieve these goals. dr. stackhouse-lawson: absolutely. i think when we really think about measuring greenhouse gases from these systems and actually trying to quantify the gas, it's really complicated, right? so we know, of course, methane is produced from unit systems, they belch that methane. it's of course a natural process of the animal's digestive capacity. we know that based on different diets, those animals have the different amounts of the gas they will emit, right, if we're measuring [indiscernible]. but the ch

mr. crist, lawson and soto of florida, and ms.l-allard of california, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for wh purpose does the gentleman from california seek recog recognition? >>r. saker, as the member designated by representative strickland, i inform the house at ms. sickland will vote ye on the previous question. the spker pro tempore: for what purpose doeshe gentleman from -- >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cuellar, i inform the house that mr. cuellar will vote yes on the previous question. e speaker pro tpore: for what purpose does the gentleman >> as the member designatedy mr. taylor of texas, i info these that the member will vote yea -- sorry, no on the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpo does the gentleman from texas see recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the memr designated by mr. pete sessionsf texas, i inform the house that this member will vote nay on the previousuestion. what purpose does the gentleman

mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated for the following members, lawson of florida, rush of illinois, and doyle of pennsylvania they all vote yes on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative lloyd smucker of pennsylvania, i inform the house that mr. smucker will vote no on h.r. 2116. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentleman from colorado rise? mr. perlmutter: to say hello to the speaker. and as the as the member designated joe neguse of colorado and mr. tim ryan of ohio, i inform the house that mr. neguse and mr. ryan will vote yes on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida rise? ms. wasserman schultz: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. crist of florida and mrs. maloney of new york, i inform the house that both members will vote yea on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designate

stackhouse lawson related to the reap program and what additional access might look like particularly for livestock producers and our dairy industry. so thank you so much, mr. chairman, for this fantastic hearing and thank you to all of our witness for your work and knowledge you brought to us today. >> thank you very much representative spamberger and your focus with your own subcommittee on how we can clap gate together with evers on conservation. i think next year's farm bill is i think critical for all of us in terms of working with america's livestock industry to achieve even better results. our next witness is ranking member of the subcommittee. i introduced him once before i don't think i need to introduce him won't. my friend representative thompson from pennsylvania. need to unmic, gt. >> jim, thank you so much. thank you to you, and our ranking member for assembling such a outstanding panel. i could listen to these people all day long. these are the vice voices we need to have as we prepare for the farm bill. in this space of sustainability, climate, wheel many climates made major climate commitments they oftentimes are struggling to find ways to

mr. lawson, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote no on the motion to adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition -- >> as the member designated by representatives clarke, ms. kuster, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the motion to adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recog recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative kehele, i inform the house that mr. kehele will vote no on the motion to adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recog recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by the following members, juan vargas, lucille roybal-allard, mr. david scott of georgia 13 i inform the house that these members will vote no on the motion to adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. porter and mr. mceachin, i inform the house t