mr. le garre -- >> i do not know why you agree with that, but i will ask your opponents. >> mr. le garre, you said about trusting advisers hat people should be suspicious. here you had an adviser to was experienced, who knew the subject, who said it was a slam dunk. [laughter] in those circumstances, what is henry to do? >> first of all, they invaded based on the english interpretation of the french rules of succession. we think henry should have known that was an illegitimate basis for going to war -- what the english think about the french rules of succession. henry had a duty to look beyond the advice he was getting to see if there was any foundation for this. a ruler cannot always turn to his advisers. >> who should he ask? henry is not a lawyer. >> henry was blessed with good counsel for many quarters. >> he got rid of falstaff. who should be asked? >> surely, he came across other lawyers in the taverns that he frequented. [laughter] >> you are also suing the archbishop, right? >> we are suing the archbishop. >> you want to hold him accountable for the advice he >> absolutel