mr. lebrun? >> good morning, chair peskin, supervisors. first of all, congratulations, a big thank you for your unanimous approval of the pennsylvania avenue extension, or p.a.x. the reason i'm addressing you today is that i do believe that you're aware of this pendi pending .5 billion trade on second street. the reason i'm addressing you today is i want to bring your attention to the additional impact of this crater on the existing capacity of the train box itself. specifically we're going to lose half of the storage capacity because of the way that we are approaching the train box. so i want to thank you for including my letters in the final version of the packet, and in particular, i'd like to turn your attention to page 17 of the packet, which highlights the potential condemnation of $2 billion of san francisco prime real estate between main street and embarcadero. so in closing, i'd like to make two recommendations. first of all, is that you accelerate the hiring of the person building -- the engineer. it's really critical as we move

mr. lebrun includes other items? okay.des members of the public that wish to address you. >> vice chair gee: next item, please. >> next item is a report on the update of the salesforce transit center. >> good morning, board members. dennis tershon, senior construction manager. i will give an update to the temporary supports. this will be a continuation of last week's presentation, but i will also -- i'm also including original slides from last week for knowing that there are different members here today than were last week, so i've included all that as a short recap. i will be covering fremont street status first, then, i will layer in first street. >> vice chair gee: could you hold on for a second? our screens -- oh, there we go. us rookies don't know which button to push on the screen. okay. thank you. thank you. all right. thank you. my apologies to the interruption. we were looking at the san francisco seal. >> i have the sales force and first street and updates, and following up with what mark had mentioned, the next

mr. lebrun. >> thank you very much. >>clerk: bruce? >> thank you for listening. i was here last week, and i made a statement. mr. peskin, i think that's your name, if i could hear it correctly. >> director reiskin: reiskin. peskin is a totally different person. >> i apologize. so of course, you made some very interesting points that i'd like to get back into depth. you said you weren't here last week. i can't remember if you were or not, and that is that these major girders are the principle members that held up everything below and above, and the notion is one cracked all the way through, and another one cracked partially through. so you can moment that the 2k3w girder had no movement capacity. therefore, others bore a secondary load, so there's been no specific announcement beyond the girder that anyone is going to look into the secondary load path, the possible yielding, the possibly loading problems, so i just wanted to say because of your investigateative minds, it's not going to be the girder, it should be the secondary load that should be published. the id