mr. lopez sanchez. where the press gets is wrong is there are two different warrants. a bench warrant in my letter to the mayor it said, if you really want to get ahead of this, when this doesn't happen again, at least install an administrative law judge. >> would you support the kind of changes that los angeles has enacted completely. i think it goes too far. if i remember correctly -- i read it once -- they are supporting pep. i don't necessarily support pep. that's the priority enforcement program. i think it goes too far in the area of misdemeanors. i would like to see it kept to serious fell aonies and violent felonies. >> the translation means you would not call or notify on lopez sanchez. there's no splitting hairs on this. it is a fact. >> no. >> you just heard you are not supporting pep. you would call not on notification lopez sanchez and it's a contradiction. >> that's not what i said. >> we're going to have to move on. we spent quite a bit of time on that issue. >> an important issue. >> there's so many other issues that i want to make sure we cover. let's

mr. lopez sanchez as it was inferred. there are two types of warrants that exist. there is a district attorney warrant and there is a bench warrant. as the example given by supervisor farrell in the commentary that we could have interrupted the purpose of why mr. lopez sanchez was returned to san francisco would have been accurate if it was a district attorney warrant because we do this all the time. but if it's a bench warrant as an extension of the courts, we were then obligated to fulfill the order of the court to facilitate transportation. when we received the call from the bureau of federal prisons in contact with the immigration contacts and enforcement that we were following law. as is expected of san francisco. and yes, you could have predicted that having mr. lopez sanchez here for 20-year-old marijuana unresolved bench warrant for possession would have been dismissing which in fact it was. however, we could not interrupt that process which is why i said which was not mentioned earlier in supervisor farrell's comments that i made a recommendation to mayor

mr. lopez sanchez as it was inferred. there are two types of warrants that exist. there is a district attorney warrant and there is a bench warrant. as the example given by supervisor farrell in the commentary that we could have interrupted the purpose of why mr. lopez sanchez was returned to san francisco would have been accurate if it was a district attorney warrant because we do this all the time. but if it's a bench warrant as an extension of the courts, we were then obligated to fulfill the order of the court to facilitate transportation. when we received the call from the bureau of federal prisons in contact with the immigration contacts and enforcement that we were following law. as is expected of san francisco. and yes, you could have predicted that having mr. lopez sanchez here for 20-year-old marijuana unresolved bench warrant for possession would have been dismissing which in fact it was. however, we could not interrupt that process which is why i said which was not mentioned earlier in supervisor farrell's comments that i made a recommendation to mayor

mr. lopez sanchez as it was inferred. there are two types of warrants that exist. there is a district attorney warrant and there is a bench warrant. as the example given by supervisor farrell in the commentary that we could have interrupted the purpose of why mr. lopez sanchez was returned to san francisco would have been accurate if it was a district attorney warrant because we do this all the time. but if it's a bench warrant as an extension of the courts, we were then obligated to fulfill the order of the court to facilitate transportation. when we received the call from the bureau of federal prisons in contact with the immigration contacts and enforcement that we were following law. as is expected of san francisco. and yes, you could have predicted that having mr. lopez sanchez here for 20-year-old marijuana unresolved bench warrant for possession would have been dismissing which in fact it was. however, we could not interrupt that process which is why i said which was not mentioned earlier in supervisor farrell's comments that i made a recommendation to mayor

mr. lopez sanchez was a homeless man with drug convictions. but no record of violent crime. bullet he fired was found to have ricocheted off the pier, suggesting that he had not targeted anyone. the suggestion that it was a horrific accident could well be true, unquote. well, here's' the truth. juan lopez sanchez was convicted of seven felonies in the u.s.a., including selling hard drugs. he was deported five times. he came back six times. he broke into a car in san francisco. he stole a gun. he recklessly fired that gun in a public place. and kate steinle died. yet, he is portrayed as a homeless man who just might have committed an accident. it's unbelievable -- unbelievable is too gentle a word. finally, i'm not going to give up. senator charles grassley, a hero on kate's law, is trying to get a stand alone vote. >> thanks to many people, including t v's bill o'reilly, for keeping this issue constantly before the people of this country. this part of the bill then thamed by bill o'reilly commonly referred to as kate's law has become so important to many americans. >> well,