mr. lowenthal: thank you, mr. chairman. i welcome those comments. let's be clear what i am talking about. i am talking about eliminating an almost a giveaway of almost all hard rock mining to define what is strategic and critical as defined by the robust methodology in the national resources council's report. now, what do i mean by a robust methodology? it says, if we look at all the mining we have, if we look at what we have to define what's strategic, we have to look along two dimensions in a scientific way. we have to know what is the impact of this mineral or this mining if it was supplied restriction. what would be the impact if there was a supply restriction? would it impact defense? would it impact national security? if it does have an impact, then it has a high, high rating on that. also, what about the supply risk? we need to measure. if we do not develop this mine at this place, are there other places that we can? if in fact a mineral has high supply risk, high impact, that not only are those minerals defined now but the secretary of inter