this was recommended in 2009, and basically mr. luntzte today. for example, one of the things he says, the arguments against the democratic health care plan must center around politicians and bureaucrats in washington, or not markets and free competition. we will hear a lot of that. it also goes on to underscore you simply must be vocal and passionate on the side of the reform, and the status quo is no longer acceptable if the dynamic becomes president obama is on the side of reform and republicans are against it then the battle is lost and every word of this 30-page document is useless. he goes on to say this and this is the whole paint. it's not enough just to say what you are against, you have to tell them what you are for. it's okay and even necessary for your campaign to center around why this health care plan is bad for america, but if you offer no vision for what is better for america, then you will be delegated an object shaw northwest. what americans are looking for in health care is what your solution is, what it will provide,

. >> i have a net deal of respect for mr. luntze and stan greenberg, another pollster and one so spends time on the science of language in looking at in detail what people should say in subject matter areas. this is particularly of interest to me because this was recommended in 2009 and basically mr. luntz describe thursday ten rules for stopping the washington takeover of health care. and it's informative even to this debate today. for example he says the caringments again this democratic healthcare plan must center around politicians bureaucrats and washington. not free markets tax incentives or competition. so we'll hear a lot of that. it also goes on to underscore you simply must be vocal and passion not on the side of three form the status quo is no longer acceptable. of the dynamic becomes president obama is on the side of reform and republicans are against it, then the battle is lost and every word of this 30-page document is useless. he goes on to say this, and this is the whole point. it's not enough just to say what you'r

i agree with mr. luntz there, and that's what this subject should be about, for us providing more access. madam secretary, may i ask you, are you aware of any republican legislative proposals that reduce the number of uninsured in this country by more than 16 million and make sure that we continue to provide all the benefits of addressing pre-existing conditions, keeping your children on the plan and making sure we focus on prevention? >> i've not seen a proposal that does that. >> i thank you, madam secretary. with that, submitting this full report for the record, i think it's worth everybody's reading, and we ought to get back to what this committee should be doing and that's to put americans first and put americans on the road to having the best access, more access, more accessibility and more availability to health care. thank you. >> thank you, and time for the gentleman has expired. we are going on to enter into the two to one phase, two on our side and one on the "d" side to keep it equal. mr. buchan