mr. maguire's framing that we need to move from a culture of speeding to a culture of safety and legislative ly and i learned a lot more insights into how critical the engineering pieces from mr. aleja and the mta staff but as always the community representatives that spoke are urging us to look at this as a crisis and especially demonstrate i epidemic as we move towards making vision zero even stronger so san francisco doesn't doesn't fall behind the other cities identified in the report and tharng thank so much fred and kathy and i'll make sure that supervisors avalos kim and yee make sure that they have the reports and the findings and outcomes from this committee i wanted also to acknowledge that we'll continue to follow up with the mta staff and others to move forward the state level ideas but also the local ideas that came forward today and thank you to commander ma mannox and we look forward to working with the police department as well with that colleagues can we -- is it tabled this hearing or -- i think that's the motion? can we table this hearing? >> motion to file without objecti

mr maguire, let me start with you. numbers are a little shocking, only because they so overstate the number of americans living in poverty, and the number of children living in poverty, why is the number of public schoolchildren so much higher than the other figures? >> ray i think the answers has do with the changing demographics in the country. the other kid that are in and will be in the public schools for the foreseeable future. >> does public education concentrate poor kids. is that number risen, in fact by the possibility of more middle class and upper class kids not using the system around the country? >> i think that we've had a complicated story about public schools leading scam to try to leave, but what is concentrated in the schools is where they live >>> have you seen this in your years of public schooling that the population in a school building is going up, and the rising. >> absolutely. in the school where i am currently we increased from 74 years. >> is that the trend in the economy or is it likely to b

mr. tom maguire and ricardo, aleja as well. >> thank you. i'm tom maguire i oversee the sustainable streets division at the mt a. perhaps the most important part of our mission is the achievement of vision zero. i'm really excited to see the board of supervisors following on its historic commitment to vision zero we of course share and i thought your comment supervisor mar that the culture of speeding on the streets is appreciated and we'd like to use initiatives like vision zero to replace that culture of speeding with a culture of safety and also i want to thank you for your research and i took a few take aways from that and speed really matters it matters for reducing the the severity of crashes and the importance of combining enforcement education and engineering together which is the vision zero approach but combining those 3 together to achieve a safety outcome and of course the importance of automated safety enforcement and that's a tool that maybe as we embark on a conversation about what the right speed limit is here in in san franc

mr. tom maguire from the department of transportation in new york where he worked for years improving safer streets in new york and our sustainable streets division and from the department of public health we have our co-chair of our san francisco vision zero task force and commander ann mannox working hard on the vision zero processes in our city and the audience nicole snider and tyler frisbee and many others. with that colleagues i'd like to ask if you have any opening comments supervisor christensen . >> supervisor campos. >> i just want to thank you and thank supervisor yee and kim i look forward to the presentations and suggestions and thank you to the budget analysts for their work as well. >> thank you with that i'd like to invite you to present your findings. >> good afternoon. supervisor mar supervisor campos and supervisor christensen i'm fred r from from the budget and analyst's office. i'm just getting this prepared. today i'm going to summarize the report that we completed at the request of supervisor mar on reduction options in san francisco. i'll start with a quick profile o

mr. tom maguire from the department of transportation in new york where he worked for years improving

. -- maguire. mr.lory duncan, senior vice president and general counsel of the retail federation. the chief information officer at brown university. dr. gil kleiman, president of policy. mr. doug johnson, senior vice president of risk management policy of the a ma american bankers association. >>>> thank you very much chairman moran. thank you for the opportunity to testify on this very important issue. as the largest security software company in the world our global intelligence network is made up of millions of sensors to give us the unique view of the entire internet landscape. as we all have seen, even as of this morning, the recent headlines about cyber attacks have focused mostly on data reaches. a cross spectrum of industries. 's network intrusions that result in stolen data have deep and profound impacts. for the individuals who must worry about and clean up their identities, for the organizations and systems that have been treated, and for the government trying to establish the right notificat

mr. chairman. thank you for holding this hearing today. ms. maguire, as you know numerous reports have linked nationstate actors to cyberattacks. some of the same countries implicated in these reports may require u.s. i.t. companies to turn over intellectual property including operating software, source code, in exchange for market access. are you concerned that such information, in the hands of what we could call and irresponsible after, could pose additional security risks? >> thank you for the question. we are concerned about having to turn over any of our intellectual property to any country. we believe that is an infringement on our ownership of intellectual property that we have clearly spent extensive resources to develop. and that we should be allowed to protect it accordingly. certainly, if it is passed to a third-party or second party, then it does expose us to potential vulnerabilities. in short, we believe that we should not have to share intellectual property. >> that there are instances, i believe, where companies are being pressured by