mr. magwood? >> yes, i think i was the first to vote. >> so you aren't ready to immediately begin a discussion on the 12 discussions -- recommendations. >> senator, i think we are already. >> i'm glad to hear that. chairman jaczko, is the process ready to go? what am i missing here? >> we are stock in developing the process, rather than moving forward to actually begin the discussion and dialogue on the recommendations. right now, what we're talking about is the process to have that discussion. unfortunately, -- with the exception of commissioner ostendorff -- most of my colleagues have waited about the process -- >> and what about that specific process? >> they are not severe. they are minor. the difference is setting an expectation on when we can get completed. i have suggested that we were to get completed. our decisions within 90 days. i think that is what i hear as the biggest point. >> and miss svinicki? >> i agree with the chairman's statement. >> do you agree we can get this done within 90

mr. magwood, you said that there were some recommendations that could be implemented right away. others that would take time. would you mentioned some of the one that fall under the implement right away category? >> i have generally tried not to point out specific recommendations because i would like to allow the process to work its way. but a clear example is what we call the walk down inspections, to confirm the plans are prepared to deal with flood and seismic events. that is one that can be done quickly. the commissioner highlighted half a dozen. i am in general agreement with what he recommended. the ultimate action on a bed, for example. we have to understand those carefully before we do anything. i think many of these can be implemented quickly. let me just share personally. i have spoken with other members of the commission. i have no sense there is any one in the commission that wants to delay this unnecessarily. everyone is looking at this seriously and wants to move forward as quickly as practical, but we want to make sure the process is done correctly. >> mr. ostendor

mr. magwood? >> as i see the votes been cast so far, i see a great deal of commonality. i think there's a census developing quickly with this, and as i said earlier, i think some of the recommendations can likely be implemented -- >> do you agree with the chairman we can get moving on this? >> i think we can launch some of them sooner than 90 days, others may take longer. >> i believe that we can october on most of these recommendations, perhaps not all. in the press there's been a perception of great -- there's more consensus, everybody is ready to move forward and there's agreement on the need to place this as the highest priority, and it cloarly is. >> okay. >> madam chairman, thank you. >> let's see, senator alexander. >> a traffic policemen's job would keep the traffic safe and all five of you staid public health and safety was your job, but if a traffic cop stopped the cars from going anywhere, his supervisor would say that's not creative of you and is there anything within the charge of the commission to make it possible for a nuclear power plant to create an envi

mr. magwood? >> as i see it so far, i see a great deal of commonality. so i think there is actually a consensus coming together quite quickly on a commission to move forward with this. as i stated earlier, i do think some of these recommendations can be implemented. >> do you agree with the chairman we can get moving? >> i think we can launch some of them sooner than 90 days. others may take longer. >> mr. osendorf? >> i believe we can act on most of these recommendations within 90 days. perhaps not all. but i think unfortunately in the press there's been a perception created there's great dissension among the commissioners on this topic which i quite frankly don't think is there. there is more consensus. everyone is ready to move forward. there is an agreement on a need to place this as the highest priority and i think there clearly is. >> madam chair, thank you. >> senator alexander? >> thank you madam chairman. a traffic policeman's job would be to keep the traffic safe and all five of you said public health and safety was your job, but if the traffic