mr. manarty, i understand you're going to be taking the charge here. speaker: mr. chair, may i? speaker: yes. speaker: i move we continue this matter to our next meeting. this is item 4, isn't it? speaker: yes. speaker: i move we continue this to our next meeting. mainly because of the nature of all of the materials and there's just so much substance involved here. we've got four inches of materials, much of which deal with very important changes and adjustments to san francisco campaign finance ordinances which will go to the whole heart of the transparency and honesty of city government. we have a request for it to be continued for well regarded entities such as the friends of ethics. i've looked over the materials in the public comment meetings, which mr. manarti handled well and he did excellent job and his commons in regards to that. there's so much here. i have to say quite honestly, i have not suggested it in light of all the materials and all of the other recommendations that are there. it falls under the election. we have a mayor -- mayor's election. we got this at the

mr. manarti -- speaker: i think i've given mr. manarti a list of those. speaker: i don't know if you can reference mr. bush's letter on page 2. there's a list of six items, specifically which he just spoke on, i think he mentioned all of them. and -- speaker: can i ask in regard to these six items. speaker: have you analyzed them and made a conscious decisions as to all of them and why they should not be encompassed within these proposed changes? speaker: not with respect to all of them. speaker: part of the reason i wanted to take time here. speaker: that's good. if you don't mind, i mean, i can go through these six with you and sort of tell you about them and sort of where they were and -- speaker: mr. chair, why don't i suggest we not do that. we've talked about the fact it's going to be bifurcated and staff provides us with a memo so we can think about it for the next time and then really come back with some exhaustive thought as to why, whether we want to incorporate them or not incorporate them. speaker: i do have some concerns about holding up regul

mr. manarti said shall -- as mr. manarti said, there is -- with money from the state, but it was a member communication from the democrats in los angeles. they cherry picked where it was going. the same thing happens here in san francisco from groups that has a special interest. we don't know who the members are. does anybody know who the members are of buildings and manager's association? are they getting money to candidates and in addition to that, giving money through boma. how about sf city. it was made up of high tech businesses. they're politically active and layer lobbyist. how do we know what -- that's why we want disclosure of donors to those groups because they're politically active. speaker: i would make one other point. when the disclosures take place, we raise the issue of disclosures of expenditures that are on election day which is currently not the practice here. we did that because so much money is spent on election day for bussing people to the polling place for calls, for direct phone calls to poten