mr. mardian's lawyer, david bress, who had been the u.s. attorney in the district of columbia in the middle of the trial became very ill, and mardian moved for severance at that point because his lawyer, david bress, became very ill, and i think this is very responsive. james neil responded this way, i'm just reading from my book, this is a terribly personal problem for me. i know dave bress. i have always liked dave bress. i'm terribly saddened by the fact he's seriously ill. okay? then he says, however, that as long as i am representing the government, i will not oppose this motion to sever. this is not based on any legal grounds. this is based on my own personal respect for david bress. all right? so to me what happened there was that the prosecutor, james neil, made a decision that was based on a factor other than the law, all right? the law, he felt, was clear that severance was not appropriate, but that out of respect, his own personal respect, he would not have the government oppose the motion to sever. all right? and the judge denie