they said to me about their teacher, mr. marx teaches us how to walk and relearn how to fly. i thought, that's what we want for all of our kids in massachusetts. when we do that to my when we invest in our kids, we will be prosperous and fair. do that, when we invest in our kids, we will be prosperous and fair. >> we would like to thank our partners, the hanover theatre for the performing arts. let's give them a round of applause. and theof commerce gazette. we would also like to thank allison king and the gazette. we would like to think our candidates. we appreciate your time this evening. thank you so much. thanks to our audience. have a great night. ♪ [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] adsere is a look at the running in the massachusetts governor's race. >> charlie baker is offering the typical plan. not much for the rest of us. we needed an economy where everyone gets a fair shot with early childhood education, equal pay for women. i want a governor for you. >> democrats

they said to me about their teacher, mr. marx teaches us how to walk and relearn how to fly. i thought, that's what we want for all of our kids in massachusetts. when we do that, when we invest in our kids, we will be prosperous and fair. >> we would like to thank our partners, the hanover theatre for the performing arts. let's give them a round of applause. chamber of commerce and the gazette. we would also like to thank allison king and the gazette. we would like to think our candidates. we appreciate your time this evening. thank you so much. thanks to our audience. have a great night. ♪ [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] >> here is a look at the ads complex mr. maker is running head of ms. coakley by four points, the exact opposite of the new york times poll that was released yesterday. it shows the volatility of recent polling in a race that is too close to call. voters weighing in on the debate felt that mr. baker was strong on the economy will miss acre was stronger on

they said to me about their teacher, mr. marx teaches us how to walk and relearn how to fly. i thought, that's what we want for all of our kids in massachusetts. when we do that to my when we invest in our kids, we will be prosperous and fair. do that, when we invest in our kids, we will be prosperous and fair. >> we would like to thank our partners, the hanover theatre for the performing arts. let's give them a round of applause. and theof commerce gazette. we would also like to thank allison king and the gazette. we would like to think our candidates. we appreciate your time this evening. thank you so much. thanks to our audience. have a great night. >> at c-span.org you can see debates and ads for races around the country. look at the ads running in the massachusetts for governors race. years ago wall street gambled with our money and destroyed so many lives. that happen let again. but that's what's at stake in this election. charlie baker is offering the typical republican plan. tax cuts for corporations, not much for the rest of us. a different view. we need an economy w

mr. democrat himself, i'll smith, the great american came before the american people and charged the leadership of his party was taking his party down the road of marxn, and stalin. he walked away from his party and never returned until the day he died. because to this day, the leadership of that party has taken that on a roll party down the road in the labor socialist part

mr. democrat himself, i'll smith, the great american came before the american people and charged the leadership of his party was taking his party down the road of marx, lenin, and stalin. he walked away from his party and never returned until the day he died. because to this day, the leadership of that party has taken that on a roll party down the road in the labor socialist party. it does not require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on a people. what does it mean whether you will be deed or the title to your business or property if the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property? and such machinery already exists. the government can find them charge to bring against any can learn it chooses to prosecute. every businessman has his own tale of harassment. has takena perversion place. our natural, unalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government and freedom has never been so fragile to our grasp as it is at this moment. american history tv sits in with a lecture from one of the nation's college professors. next, vanderbilt university professor sara

mr. democrat himself, al smith, the great american, came before the market people and charged with the leadership of his party was taking his party down the road under the banner of marx, lenin, stalin. he walked away from his party and never return to the day he died, because to this day, the leadership of that party has taken that honorable party down the road in the image of the labor-socialist party of england. it does not require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on the people. what does it mean whether you hold the deed or title to your business or property if the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property? such machinery already exists. the government can find some charge to bring about -- against any concern it chooses to prosecute. every businessman has his own tale of harassment. somewhere, a perversion has taken place. our natural inalienable rights are considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment. 2014 part of c-span's campaign coverage. follow us on twitter and like us on face

mr. jefferson would appear either patently false or meaningless and superstitious to the great men who shape our political imagination, men like aristotle, hobbs, marxr nietzsche. of course, we need not go so far back. we could add the names of american presidents like wilson and roosevelt to the list of those who argued for liberation from constitutional piety in favor of a reevaluation of the constitution. natural rights and its evil twin, the rights of men, seem to move in an eerie antipony. thus, the idea of modern rights and economic freedom grew up side by side with the refusal to accept any dogmatic belief in objective value. this is a big problem for modernity, for limited government and for liberty. these self-evident truths represent the theoretical proposition on which this nation was founded, and though these principles must be continually reinterpreted to apply to changing circumstances, what future exists for a regime founded on the lex or the that? if no one quite believes in it anymore? this is where the life of a conservative judge who favors limited government becomes difficult. a legal philosophy that does not recognize absolute m