mr. mckinley votes no. mr. gardener votes no. mr. mom peo votes no. mr. kin singer votes no. mr. griffith votes no. mr. waxman votes aye. mr. dingle votes aye. mr. marky votes aye. mr. towns votes aye. mr. paloan votes aye. mr. rush votes aye. mrs. aschew votes aye. mr. engle votes aye. mr. green votes aye. ms. duget votes aye. mrs. caps votes aye. mr. doyle votes aye. ms. aye. mr. votes aye. ms. baldwin. mr. ross. mr. ross votes no. mr. mathisson votes no. mr. butterfield votes aye. mr. barrow votes no. mrs. christianson votesaye. ms. castor votes chairman upton. no. >> others wishing to cast a vote? seeing none, the clerk will report the tally. >> mr. chairman, there were 19 ayes and 34 nays. >> the amendment is not. the next vote will occur on the doyle amendment and those in favor will sayos opposed will say no. the clerk will call the roll. >> mr. barton votes no. mr. sterns votno. mr. whitfield votes no. mr. shim kiss votes no. mr. pits votes no. mrs. bono mac votes no. mr. walden votes no. mr. terry votes no. mr. rogers votes no. mr. mi rick votes no. mr. sullivan votes no

mr. mckinley. mr. mckinley votes no. mr. gardener. mr. gardener votes no. mr. pock peo votes no. mr. kin singer. mr. kin singer votes no. mr. griffith. mr. griffith votes no. mr. waxman. mr. waxman votes aye. mr. dingle. mr. dingle votes no. mr. marky. mr. marky votes aye. mr. towns. mr. towns votes aye. mr. paloan? >> mr. paloan votes aye. mr. rush votes aye. mr. engle votes aye. >> mr. green votes no. mr. duget votes no. mr. caps votes aye. mr. doyle. mr. doyle votes no. mr. shekowsky votes aye. mr. congal ez votes no. mr. insly votes no. ms. baldwin. mr. ross. mr. ross

mr. mckinley, for five minutes. >> administrator, thank you very much. i'm sure it's been grueling to go through three hours of this. first question i have, if i could maybe get through a couple quick questions with yes or nos to the extent that we can, have you ruled out regulating cole ash as a hazardous substantial under subtitle c of ricra? >> we have not made a final rule. that would have to be a no. >> with this notice of intent from head waters resources in filing an action against and i get some environmental groups are also doing the reverse, they're taking an action against the epa on the hazardous ways perhaps, can you give us for the record a commitment that you'll take this into consideration when -- if you were to set that will you will consider the fact that headwaters is also put in a concern and that that will be included in the settlement? >> i'm not familiar with the letter. but this is -- >> it was filed in your office -- it was addressed to you on february the 9th. >> okay. >> it was their notice they want equal protection under this

mr. mckinley brought up and a number of people brought up is the amount of grants that are given by epa to foreign entities directly or indirectly. i would just ask that you all provide us with a list of those over the last three years. last three years. at this time i recognize the gentleman from west virginia -- i mean from virginia for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. miss jackson, secretary jackson, today the d.c. circuit is hearing oral argument? the green house gas litigation and that involves the tayloring rule. and in your brief that has been filed on behalf that indicates in that brief that there would be a need to hire 230,000 full time employees that there would need to be an additional 81,000 psd permits per year, six million title five permits and a cost to the epa of $21 billion on top of the current budget, $21 billion per year. and then the sentence right after the numbers, based on this analysis, epa found that applying the literal statutory thresholds on january 2nd, 2011 would, joy overwhelming the resources of permitting authorities and severely impair the func

mr. mckinley. the chair: the gentleman from west virginia is recognized for two minutes. mr. mckinley: thank you. mr. speaker, i rise today in favor of h.r. 1173. this bill would save hardworking taxpayer dollars and eliminate a costly and flawed obamacare provision known as the class act. this program is sold as a self-sustaining program, one that would reduce federal spending. however the program was problematic from the start. the president and the democrat leadership in congress knew this fact for over a year and a half a -- ago and still include the class program in the health care bill. during an investigation it was revealed that the obama administration officials and senate democrats were very much aware that this was not going to work. and that the department officials warned for a year before passage the class program would be a fiscal disaster. as far back as may of 2009, the c.m.s. chief actuary sent an email that warned officials that the program doesn't look workable. these 200 pages of exhibits from exhibit show that the department officials were voicing concern

mr. mckinley. the chair: the gentleman from west virginia is recognized for two minutes. mr. mckinley: thank you. mr. speaker, i rise today in favor of h.r. 1173. this bill would save hardworking taxpayer dollars and eliminate a costly and flawed obamacare provision known as the class act. this program is sold as a self-sustaining program, one that would reduce federal spending. however the program was problematic from the start. the president and the democrat leadership in congress knew this fact for over a year and a half a -- ago and still include the class program in the health care bill. during an investigation it was revealed that the obama administration officials and senate democrats were very much aware that this was not going to work. and that the department officials warned for a year before passage the class program would be a fiscal disaster. as far back as may of 2009, the c.m.s. chief actuary sent an email that warned officials that the program doesn't look workable. these 200 pages of exhibits from exhibit show that the department officials were voicing concern

>> when you get to florida it is when mckinley romney and mr.ingrich started beating on each other. i think the overall enthusiasm is good. the numbers going to outside groups. this is a republican electorate that does want to beat the president but don't necessary little like all of the negativity and this is about to get thrown on rick santorum coming up. >> chris: we have about 30 seconds left. is it the negativity of the campaign or people aren't excited about the candidates? >> the lack of a passionate vision or cause animating the romney campaign. and the enthusiasm gap is a problem. they ultimately will be motivated to vote against barack obama. what george bush understood is it was all about the independents. the severe conservativism is much too limiting and doesn't address the challenge in the fall which is the 5% or 6% that can go either way. that is the sweet spot he needs to get to. the longer the nomination process lasts the longer it takes to get there. >> chris: we have to go. thank you, panel. see you next week. check out panel

mr. chair. first let me say thank you general mckinley for giving a shot out to play obviously consider one of thefinest had some in the history of the united states and he has been pivotal with the council of governors to our success with regard to the dual status command and with regard frankly to your presence on the joint chiefs of staff so thank you for the show built and to the leadership and to all of the tags present here for your tremendous leadership at home and your and administrator fugate is an amazing pressure that we have formed and we can close to a real disaster here recently and you were there immediately on the phone with what can we do, the emergency operations and that is an example of how we get together immediately. don't wait. again i am to thinking on behalf of the governors in the country for what you brought to your role on the leadership that he played. i don't want to put either of you in an uncomfortable position. but the letter that the chair has just acknowledged i would like to cut to please describe for all the fuss the practical impact of that level of cuts to ou

mckinley refused to pledge aid for that anti-lynching legislation. white, in frustration, came to the house floor and delivered a speech in which he said this, mr.airman, is perhaps the negro's temporary farewell to the american congress, but let me say phoenix-like he will rise up and come again someday. during the 28-year absence of african-americans from congress, civil rights legislation for african-americans in both the south and the north was all but ignored. washington was a segregated city, the federal government was segregated by custom, if not by statute. there were a few white members of congress who carried the mantle of racial justice, confronting their colleagues on issues that were important to black americans. the naacp which was founded in 1909 and its executive secretary, james wheldon johnson, worked closely with a few members in the house to secure passage of an anti-lynching bill in the early 1920s, but that bill died in the senate. and this gentleman behind me was one of the advocates for african-americans in a true character. george white, from north carolina, had introduced legislation originally that would have punished

mckinley refused to pledge aid for that anti lynching legislation. well, in frustration white came to the house floor and delivered his speech in which he said, this, mr. chairman, is, perhaps among the negroes temporary farewell to the american congress. let me say, phoenix-like he will rise up and come again some day. during that 20 a year absence of african americans from congress civil rights legislation for african americans about the south and the north was all but ignored. washington was a segregated city. the federal government was segregated by custom, if not statute. there were a few members of congress who carry the mantle of racial justice confronting their colleagues and issues that were important to black americans. the naacp, which was founded in 1909 and its executive secretary worked closely with a few members in the house to secure passage of an anti lynching bill in the early 1920's, but that bill died in senate. this gentleman behind me was one of the advocates and one of -- for african-americans. george white from north carolina had introduced legislation a result that would have punished southern states for disenfranchising black