mr. mckinley, for five. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you again for coming before us. in the last week during the break, i returned to west virginia and was on overload of negative information coming at us in west virginia. the first newspaper i got when i got back there was "dark day for miners." they had just announced that 2,268 coal mine pentagon jobs were lost. 2,268 families now are looking for jobs as a result of this. then soon thereafter we got another power plant closed down. the camera power plant. even though ferc has said -- and they've testified before us that the concern they have is that we're going to have rolling blackouts in the midwest if we don't start replacing these power plants but we're continuing to shut these power plants down. then there was another one that went on to say just in one community, one small community, that they're going to lose $61 million in wages as a result of this. i'm dealing with all of this crisis. when you add the additional losses, these 2,268, now we're up to -- and i believe the chairman mentioned it earlier today,

mr. mckinley for five. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you again for coming for us. last week during the break i returned to west virginia and was on overload of negative information coming at us in west virginia. the first newspaper i got when i got back was dark day for miners. they just announced that 2268 coal mining jobs were lost. 2268 families now are looking for jobs as a result of this. soon thereafter, another power plant closed down, cameron power plant, even though ferk testified that the concern we have is they're going to have rolling blackouts in the midwest if we don't start replacing the power plants but we're continuing to shut the power plants down. another one went on to say just in one community, one small community that they're going to lose $61 million in wages as a result of this. so i'm dealing with all of this crisis. when you add the additional losses, 2268, now we are up to -- i believe the chairman mentioned it earlier today that we have now lost in west virginia 45% of our coal miners are unemployed since 2012. just in three years. three

mr. mckinley for five. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you again for coming forth. the last week during the break i returned to west virginia and was on overload of the negative information coming at us in west virginia. the first newspaper i got when i got back there was dark days for minors. they just announced 2268 jobs were lost. 2268 families are now looking for jobs as a result of this. then soon thereafter we got another power plant closed down even no ferc has testified before the concern i have is we will have ruling blackout in the midwest if we don't start replacing power plants but we continue to shut the power plants down. another one went on to say it one small community they are going to lose $61 million in wages as a result of this. so i am stealing with all of this crisis. when you add the additional losses the 2268 the chairman mentioned earlier today that we have now lost to west virginia 45% of coal miners are unemployed since 2012. just three years we have 45% of coal miners looking for work. last friday i met with the coal association. they sai

mr. mckinley, who left, was just saying that in west virginia they've lost 45% of their coal jobs. this economic impact affects all of us and that's why we're trying to move this energy bill and that's why this quadrennial bill is so important, to look at all aspects of everything. because everyone knows that we're fortunate we have an abundant energy supply and natural gas and oil as well but we have infrastructure needs and it takes years and so as we're shutting down coal plants through regulatory orders we don't always have the capability to get the energy product to where it needs to go. and so that's what this is all about. so one of the things i need to ask you the first installment was a colossal undertaking with 22 agencies involved and more than a year of work. and if this is the first installment of the qer, will there be a new installment each year for the next three years and then the process will begin all over again? is that what your understanding is? >> no. i apologize. so this first installment it frankly took a few more months than we had hoped. we're now in the

mr. mckinley of west virginia. page 9, line 6 after the dollar amount insert reduced by $5 million, increase by $5 million. the chair: pursuant to house -- for what purpose does the gentleman from -- mr. visclosky: i'd like a copy of the gentleman's amendment and i'd appreciate the courtesy of having one. the chair: pursuant to house resolution 303 -- copies will be distributed. pursuant to house resolution 303, the gentleman from west virginia and a member opposed each will control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from west virginia. mr. mckinley: thank you, mr. chairman. formed in 1993, the you challenge is a 17-month program run by state individuals national guards. the mission is to give troubled youth a second chance and addresses our nation's dropout rate by providing them the opportunity to obtain a high school diploma. youth challenge has transformed the lives of over 120,000 young people since 1993 and has expanded to 35 sites and 27 states including the district of columbia and puerto rico.

mr. mckinley for five minutes. >> thank you mr. chairman. don't think we'll be able to get fewer questions. is there a timeframe to submit written questions? >> within 10 days. >> okay thank you. welcome back. my question is should a rule like this that helps public health be withheld? because a very regulatory burden that we are referring to hear? >> i'm not sure i understand your question congressman. >> if there's a regulatory burden imposed with this to the epa withhold the bill? >> the clean air act direct epa step -- sets the standards and the supreme court has said that is our job and the issues related to implementation our a matter of separate consideration not to be considered in determining -- >> i'm curious because it goes back and you have heard it mentioned several times at that the president did step them and say this was going to cause regulatory burden therefore he asked that the rule be held back for period of time. >> that was a recitation of that. >> thousand 2011. so i guess part of the question is what has changed if yo

hanna is seen as a plutocrat trampling on labor and mckinley is seen as a child dominated by mr. hanna and others of his ilk. you can see the dollar signs on the lapel, on the caller of the cartoon, hanna's hand holding mckinley. these cartoons, there were lots of them, dominated the campaign against him. you could not come up with two candidates who were more different in their personalities, their speaking styles. mckinley sound money protective tariffs. bryan, cheaper money, silver traveling around the country. mckinley staying at home. mckinley looking for work support from business, big cities. bryan running around to rural voters. mckinley won the entire northeast and midwest. he winds up winning seven point one million -- 7.1 million in the popular vote. mckinley gets 271 votes, because he gets the populace states and bryan gets 176. as a result, william jennings bryan is defeated. william mckinley becomes president of the united states and sets the basis for republican political strategy from 1896 until roosevelt in 1932. other than woodrow wilson, no republican gets elect

mr. mckinley the left was just telling me that in west virginia they have lost 45% of their old jobs. so the economic impact -- cold jobs. -- affects all of us. that's why we're trying to move this energy bill. that's why the quadrennial energy review is so important to look at all aspects of everything because it said windows, we are fortunate that we have an abundant energy supply, natural gas particularly, and oil as well, but we have infrastructure needs and it's very difficult to get permits. they take years. and so as we are shutting down coal plants the regulatory orders we don't always have the capability to get the energy product to where it needs to go. so that's what this is all about. so one of the things i just wanted to ask you, you were talking to the development of this first installment was a colossal undertaking with at least 22 agencies involved in more than a year of work. and if this is the first installment of the qer, will there be a new installment each year for the next three years? it in the process will begin all over again? is that what you're understanding

mr. mckinley, who left, was just saying that in west virginia, they've lost 45% of their coal jobs.ct affects all of us and that's why we're trying to move this energy bill and that's why this quadrennial bill is so important, to look at all aspects of everything. because everyone knows that we're fortunate, we have an abundant energy supply and natural gas and oil as well but we have infrastructure needs and it takes years and so as we're shutting down coal plants

mr. mckinley, who left, was just saying that in west virginia, they've lost 45% of their coal jobs.is economic impact affects all of us and that's why we're trying to move this energy bill and that's why this quadrennial bill is so important, to look at all aspects of everything. because everyone knows that we're fortunate, we have an abundant energy supply and natural gas and oil as well but we have infrastructure needs and it takes years and so as we're shutting down coal plants through regulatory orders, we don't always have the capability to get the energy product to where it needs to go. and so that's what this is all about. so one of the things i need to ask you, the first installment was a colossal undertaking with 22 agencies involved and more than a year of work. and if this is the first installment of the qer, will there be a new installment each year for the next three years and then the process will begin all over again? is that what your understanding is? >> no. i apologize. so this first installment, it frankly took a few more months than we had hoped. we're now in the

mr. seale: the secretary to the president was a nephew, van buren's son. mostly, if they existed, either a close relative had become more professional by the time of theodore roosevelt. mckinleywho is forgotten, was a master organizer. in the earlier 19th century, family was always there. i think it was a matter of trust. you wouldn't have wanted to be james polk's secretary. they wouldn't let him go to picnics or anything. there would be plenty of chances for chelsea clinton to be part of the white house office. ms. swain: this is definitely a mold breaker in this election. we have a question here in the front row. >> can you tell us about when barry lincoln went back right after the assassination and lived in the white house? mr. seale: 30 days. ms. swain: did you see the flag that was staged during the mourning? mr. seale: things were stolen during this time. they would cut the trim off of curtains and things like that. mrs. lincoln was upstairs wailing for 30 days. her seamstress, a former slave was the only one who seemed to get along with her so the government hired her. grandstands were being built and her carriage had to go right through it. people went to see her. sh