mr. mcleod and allow late for mr. lee. please uphold mr. mcleod complaint and resolve this issue. i've been in touch with our architectural historian who helped write the statement for liberty hill historic district. he agrees this house was built in 1876 like all the rest of the houses on the street and didn't have any of these windows. i'm submitted for sunshine 150 words. >> i got a question. i want to clarify. it's been stated in the brief and repeated, there's no ground floor windows. you're referring to property line windows. the rear home of the appellant has side windows. >> yes, the ground floor windows were in the back which were the kitchen and they were facing the rear. >> i have a question too. being long-term neighbor of the block, i been into most of the homes. we've all been in their houses and they've been in mine. have you ever been in window and observed that there was no window there? have you been in that property prior or neighboring property and seen that window? >> i only been in the neighboring property. i've never seen -- >> are you aware -- some people l

mr. mcleod until the last tenant. when mr. mcleod block the window from opening. after the tenants protested, mre blockage. we cannot tolerate this. we filed an elder abuse claim to get the window block to remove. the court hearing was on april 10, 2019. the judge ordered him to remove the blockage. i told the judge that i filed an application to change the existing window into a sliding window and it was approved by the san francisco building department. he said that the permit application was flawed. mr. mcleod read it and ask to take a photo of it. the judge denied the request. on april 17, 2019, mr. mcleod filed appeal for window permit. saying window is not an original window. occupants cannot use the window in case of exits in case of fire. mostly in his brief, he did not provide any written supporting documentation for his claims of privacy, noise, safety or fire escape. the historical building materials claims presented for window not been original window it's not firsthand information. also, historical claims are not specific with regards to specific buil