mr. medvedev's permanent account and i -- personal account and also got peskov if i'm not mistaken.g known about who might have done that and an example of real world effects where that played into the opposition mobilization and protests against the government in thank you. >> you say, in 2011, yaw. >> recently. medvedev? >> i believe. [inaudible question] -- palaces and so on. >> ah. [inaudible question] >> yeah. medvedev accounts is hacked by -- and once a question is about how does operate with oppositions? >> well, -- [inaudible question] the real world effect of when that became public, known as a motivation towards antigovernment protests. we haven't seep that level of protest since 2011. >> there's some groups, i think some of these groups are working whose government who -- which have desks from administration, president, ap in russia, like his name is -- in russianed administration, he is the main figure by monetary internet and he in some investigations told that he was a man who did this -- make this decision to hack some positions like -- some other guys in russia. the

russian government with whom is america doing to going to talk if it doesn't want to talk with mr medvedev almost the level of i mean this this is going incredibly far and it's really not reassuring for the world yet china has already commented on john's remarks saying they reflect cold war thinking i would you agree that the president's address was quite aggressive. it was very aggressive and one you speak of deterrence you speak of potential mutual destruction so saying is it it that unmatched power of america would be the best guarantee for peace sounds a bit strange because of.

russian government with whom is america doing to going to talk if it doesn't want to talk with mr medvedev almost a lover of i mean this this is going incredibly far and it's really not reassuring for the world you know china has already commented on chance remarks saying they reflect cold war thinking i would you agree that the president's address was quite aggressive. it was very aggressive and one you speak of deterrence you speak of potential new tool destruction so saying is it matched power of america would be the best guarantee for peace sounds a bit strange because of course the other potential powers like china and russia. who are nuclear powers as well can also increase their arsenal and then we get into dangerous developments john used his address to once again promote his america first message saying the u.s. should maintain its troops overseas to find terrorists as it is quite a shift from his presidential campaign promise that america would no longer be the policemen of the world. true but of course he was surprised as others by the development of terrorism and isis and all t

mr. turovsky: [indiscernible] >> just recently. medvedev?: --the speakers were able to [indiscernible] mr. turovsky: yeah. --or event -- midget of --get of -- medvedev [indiscernible] howestion about hackers operate with oppositions -- >> [indiscernible] but then there was the real-world if it aired when that became public as a motivational tool to -- we have not seen that level of protests since -- [indiscernible] mr. turovsky: yeah. thinkare some groups, i some of these groups were working in government who -- -- fromve administration president, a.p., in russia we would say. his name is -- in the russian administration. figure -- internet. investigations who makeshe was a man these decisions to have some positions like -- or some other guys in russia. [indiscernible] -- hacked some positions his name is -- and now think he is in jail in germany. >> i will follow up on that question. if i understood it correctly, a follow-up question, the video that you were referring to, when they sent it, they sent a drone to take it. that is not hacking.