mr. mitchell you have 3 minutes. >> hi again. >> yeah. we got the box it was directly across the street on burrow street and would that be with the hawaii with an. >> on the wine drive and on the side yes i don't know if it matters when you go fore a permit shouldn't you have the right address where you're putting it. usually i know upper talking about numbers i addresses. there's no one 10 burrows on that street they've made a mistake with the numbers and that counts somewhat i'm not sure but law by obviously they didn't do their homework because one hundred 6 is where they're putting it in front of the door and jumps to one 12 or 15 they've got the address wrong. i hope you take into consideration and right around the corner is a good place i told the at&t people at martin luther king at the corner of gerard they can cover it with interests i don't understand why they didn't look into those options >> mr. mitchel i'm not sure where i'm going with that but if this box was moved in a westerly direction so it's across from where your plant

mr. mitchel what's the width felt sidewalk saw i don't have it in front of me. >> i'm sure the information is here. >> the steering committee donated pots and flowers so this takes up room we're trying to make our street for the community we're not that's all we want space for our people to walk by. >> thank you. thank you >> okay mr. johnson. >> thank you. i'd like to begin by correcting a couple of statements that the appellant made. so the appellant suggested for instance, that at&t did no community outreach then he wanted to conceive is not the case at&t, in fact, connected conducted two walk-through's and wanted people to meet with at&t. we originally property the box on the other side the community opposed that. so then we remailed and noticed we sent and field person out and meet e met with the appellant by attempting a purchase an easement in the driveway and that driveway was two dangerous because it's an active driveway so it seems like it was not a good location. when we looked at the surrounding neighborhood the problem that came once we couldn't put it across the street this w

mr. mitchell for his opening statement. >> thank you mr. chairman for having this important hearing and i would like to thank the panel is for coming today as well. today's hearing provides the opportunity to examine the va inspector general's final report on the patient wait times and scheduling practices within the phoenix va health care system. this report did not stated directly as show relationship between the long patient wait times and veterans deaths. for some that is a major concern and acquisition of undue influence by the va on the inspector general's report will be discussed at length today. with the ig did find is that the cases included in this report clearly shows that there are serious lapse in va's follow-up, coordination, quality and continuance of care for our veterans. they also concluded that the inappropriate scheduling practices demonstrated in phoenix are a nationwide systematic problem. i do not need anymore evidence or analysis that there is no doubt in my mind that veterans were harmed by the scheduling practices

mr. jones. >> bill mitchell, a 30-year news veteran has covered many rock slides during his career, but none this big. >> and then she came back over and she said, why don't you guys move back a little ways. she said, i'm hearing things up on that mountain that really unnerve me. i said, what are you hearing? she said, i'm hearing pops and snaps and things that make me believe some more debris may come down. so we moved back about 20 yards at that time. >> i heard a sound that sounded like a car door slam. a really sharp rapport. i talked to steve, the county maintenance supervisor and said, have you heard this sound before? he said, yeah, we did indeed hear this before. i said, we have to get all this construction equipment stopped. we have to hear what's going on. >> they stopped the jackhammer and moved the construction and news crews even further back. >> vanessa goes on and she takes a look at the mountain and then she walks back and she's talking to some of the tdot personnel. and all of a sudden they start walking back, she jumps in her car and drives to the other end of the road, and they

. >> andrea mitchell? >> mr. ambassador, it's andrea mitchell here in new york. down, and do you think that putin's last-minute plan that he apparently wrote on a slip of paper -- is that plan specifically to sort of get nato to bow to russia until after the nato summit? is that the timing of what putin is up to? >> i think the timing is obvious. putin is trying, as you said, to undermine the unity of the alliance. it's a sheer maneuvering. but at the same time, it's for president poroshenko of ukraine to decide whether the russian proposals are acceptable or not acceptable. it has to be a negotiation between ukraine and the separatists. we don't have to dictate the terms of the agreement. >> mike. >> mr. ambassador, your president has been fairly critical of the lack of action in the middle east with regard to syria by the united states, indicating -- here's a quote, "if two years ago we had acted to ensure a transition, we wouldn't have had an islamic state." and i would like to underline the word "we." we had acted. it almost always falls to the united states

mr. taylor says he was at the new hotel trying to get jobs for people who live in that skbrabd. the new york daily news reports that the hotel owner says mitchellhis company for a percentage of the salaries paid to the neighborhood residents. the new york post and new york daily news reports that the nypd is conducting an extortion investigation. mr. taylor said, that is unequivocally not true and absurd. that's not how we do business. mr. taylor explained what sparked the fight this way to the "daily news." at that split moment, the queensbridge came out of me. it was like, don't get in my face like that. in mitchell taylor's position on the civilian complaint review board, he is supposed to sit in judgment of police officers like officer daniel pantellio whose chokehold technique killed eric garner. >> don't touch me [ bleep ] don't touch me. >> i can't breathe, i can't breathe, i can't breathe. >> that's a video about how important the civilian complaint review board's is. the work on the civilian complaint review board is way too important to be left to people who lose their tempers and start fights because someone gets in their face. their

mr. hans von spakovsky earlier compared this outgoing attorney general to an attorney who was, who departed under a cloud, mitchell. i noticed today one of the first calls he made notifying his stepping down was to ethel kennedy is. that who he identifies with? >> he's certainly earned the comparison. when you look at the major issues, and if you just take the cause of lgbt rights in this country, eric holder was on the right side of history. he was on the right side of history in a way that not only allowed the department to comport with its traditional role, but in a way that allowed us to move forward in a way that has transformed this country ever since. so i think when we look back and again in the fullness of time we consider his tenure, we consider what he's done in criminal justice reform, we consider what he's done in voting right, we consider what he's done for civil rights, i think there's no question that eric holder will be one of the greatest attorneys general that the country has seen. >> ifill: will he outlast his critics, mr. von spakovsky? >> i don't think so. i think going down the road, the leg

mr. chairman. and thank you for having this very important hearing. dr. mitchell briefly, on page 15 of your written testimony, you pulled out case number 35 from the ig report as a special circumstance, and please explain why you did so in this particular case? >> i want to make it clear that i did not have access to the records that the oig went through. however, anecdotally i was told that this was the same patient which i was familiar with, and the details are the same with one glaring omission. in the oig report, the history starts with the patient presented with the e.r. -- to the e.r. with his family, seeking mental health care. he was evaluated, he declined admission, he was discharged home, he committed suicide the next day. what wasn't in the report and i believe this is the same case and if it's not it should be reported anyway, he was having problems with depression and called his parents and they brought him to the walk-in mental health care clinic. however because he had not been enrolled in phoenix v.a. he was diverted from there to the eligibility