mr. mosley. it is an article published in "news of the world". i'm going to getted heading. we'll not look at either of text. i will paraphrase one matter. certainly not going. to look foirt than that. the heading is -- >> no question of this article appearing anywhere? >> no. >> good. >> formula one boss has sex nazi orgy with five hookers. the article itself links you with your father, doesn't it? >> it does. of. the article appeared on the front page and pages 4 and 5 of the newspaper. photographs appear which were the result of, i think a covert camera in the lapel of women e as she was called, is that correct? >> that is correct. >> can you tell us please about the timing? the article is not in the first edition of "the news of the world". it was in presumably the second edition. why do you think that was the case? >> i think that was to avoid any danger of me finding out about the article and asking for an injunction to stop it. from being published. >> that is implicit in what you said. th

mr. mosley.an i looked out the wider picture for your evidence and this is the witness statements. first of all, you deal with the ptt. >> what you said -- that's not unfamiliar because it challenges the collar evidence and other opinions with the inquiry's feet. there are various points. the pcc wouldn't post or didn't present in a scandalous story first union name them. he mentioned positive aspects out of 105, 106 reasons of balance. could you tell us a little bit about those matters and perhaps their power on you. >> absolutely. and in my case it's helpful when it came to trying to stop their harassment when -- after the test of my son. they did cooperate then. and i believe i have personal experience, but they have some success in preventing publication that shouldn't be published. people know the stories coming out and i think -- i believe a lot in that way quite successfully at the same fundamental point that if you don't know the stories coming up, you can't bring the pcc to help. that's