mr. moulton, these members will vote yes on s.3294. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by drr gosar of arizona, mr. gosar will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. christian ms. roybal-allard, both will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition snr mr. carter: as the member designated by mr. taylor of texas, i inform the house that mr. taylor will vote yes on s.3294. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from delaware seek recognition? ms. blunt rochester: as the member designated by ms. degette, will vote yes on s.3294. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. tiffany, i inform the house that mr. tiffany will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does t

mr. moulton for five minutes. i recognize you, mr. moulton. >> thank you, madam chairwoman, thank you to the witnesses for sticking this out. i know this is a long time but we're grateful for your wisdom on this incredibly important issue. professor larco, if i may start with you, emotional, which is an av company headquartered in boston, testing their technology looks different in massachusetts than it does in nevada or at least that's how i understand it so states essentially are being burdened with the absence of clear federal guidance. beyond the burden individual states and communities like nevada and massachusetts, what does this cost with regard to our national priorities to not have these federal standards? >> dutch for the question. i think you're absolutely right that a lot of the deployment of avs are actually -- it's a local issue, right, and a lot of things that i talked about before, some of these ramifications, cascading impacts, are really growing affecting different communities differently and there needs to be some co

mr. moulton of massachusetts, these members will vote yes on h.r. 5616. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, i inform the house that mr. long will vote yes on h.r. 5616. and madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. desjarlais of tennessee, i inform the house that mr. desjarlais will vote yes on h.r. 5616. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by chairwoman lofgren and johnson and kelly and bobbie rush, these members will vote yes on h.r. 5616. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north dakota seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. timmons of south carolina, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote yes on h.r. 5616. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will

mr. moulton for five minutes. >> thank you madame chairman for sticking this out it's a long time but were grateful for this incredibly important issue. professor, if i may start with you has partnered with one day without if regular regulatory framework testing and technology looks different in massachusetts, that's how i understand it. essentially they are burdened with the absence of clear federal guidance. beyond that burden communities like nevada and massachusetts, what is the cost to a national priority not to have these federal standards quick. >> thank you for the question. you are right the deployment it is a local issue with the verifications that will be affecting different communities differently and it needs to be some control at the local level and is fantastic to hear the issues around safety and labor but one of the main points that is not the only questions we really need to be working at the local level such answer your question the role of federal government what's really important it does many things we been talking about here to support them and to support cities to

mr. moulton, secretary moultrie, thank you all for being here. thank you for what you do for america every day. this is one the most important posturings i think we have to i won't have lots in the open session i think what we need to say dash i look forward to the closed session where you guys can tell us what you need to do the things that america needs you to do. thank you and all the men and women who serve under you for the service. >> thank you, ranking memberr kelly. will now hear from witnesses and will move to question answer session in belief onst a one run of question and reconvene and upon such session which will take place in rayburn 20 to 12. i've now will mr. moultrie. >> thank you, chairman gallego, ranking member kelly and assumes many of the subcommittee it's a privilege to test on the current posture of the fence intelligence occurred in a prize and addressing the threats facing the united states of america, its allies and partners. the department of defense intelligence and securityy professionals work everyday to address the

mr. moulton for five minutes. >> thank you, mr.chairman. 202-748-8001 agree with the marine corps strategy to maintain pressure on china in the pacific? >> yes, congressman i do. as a part of deterrence, against that competitor, it will take the entire joint force. i credit both the commandant as well as the chief of staff of the army to adjust the forms so the marine letourneau regiment concept to be able to be expeditionary, forward and provide support -- >> do you think the need radically resource it? >> the department of the navy? i don't the commandant is moving quickly. there some capability we would like to master. >> the marine corps disagrees, feels that you don't have enough and he was shipping devoted to this and the reason is because when the navy does a plan for this they have used our readiness factor of 80% availability. the marine corps looks at historic operational availability, which is more like 63% 63% i guess it's been about 43% literally half the planning number that you used in the past year. so not sure how

mr. moulton for five minutes. >> thank you for being here with us. a lot of my questions are about modernization. how we face the future and meet the challenges and the opportunities that it presents. can you talk to me for a second about how we're modernizing our military, our national security. here we are watching russian tanks get destroyed by drones on tv. one of the biggest threats that americans face from this ongoing war in ukraine is a threat of cyber attacks here at home. and our biggest adversary in the world is china. china has not only invested in future capabilities like advance missile systems, space systems and artificial intelligence but they've made important cuts to make those investments possible. we used to quite frankly be thrilled that china had a million man army because it wasn't that good. they cut that army to invest in future capabilities. how is the administration meeting that challenge? >> thank you for that. we are increasing the department of defense budget by 4%. it is in line with the national defense strategy. last

mr. moulton for five minutes. i recognize you, mister moulton. >> think you to all the witnesses for seeking the south. i know this is a long time, but we are grateful for your witness on this incredibly important issue. professor larco, if i may start with you. -- partnered with hyundai to develop a v fleet. but without a legal framework for av's testing their technology, which is different massachusetts than nevada, at least a understand it. so states are being burdened with the absence of clear federal guidance. beyond the bird and individual states and communities like nevada and massachusetts, what does this cost with regard to our national priorities, do not have these federal standards? >> thank you very much for the question. i think you're absolutely right. a lot of the deployment of a these are actually -- it's a local fishery right. a lot of things i talked about -- cascading impacts are going to be affecting different communities differently, and there needs to be some control at the local level to be

mr. moulton for five minutes. >> thank you for being here with us. a lot of my questions are about modernization. how we face the future and meet the challenges and the opportunities that it presents. can you talk to me for a second about how we're modernizing our military, our national security. here we are watching russian tanks get destroyed by drones on tv. one of the biggest threats that americans face from this ongoing war in ukraine is a threat of cyber attacks here at home. and our biggest adversary in the world is china. china has not only invested in future capabilities like advance missile systems, space systems and artificial intelligence but they've made important cuts to make those investments possible. we used to quite frankly be thrilled that china had a million man army because it wasn't that good. they cut that army to invest in future capabilities. how is the administration meeting that challenge? >> thank you for that. we are increasing the department of defense budget by 4%. it is in line with the national defense strategy. last

mr. moulton of massachusetts, mr. swasy of new york, mr. trone of maryland, mr. harder of california, mr. desaulnier of california, mr. kind of wisconsin i inform the house that these six members will vote yes on h.r. 2160. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida rise? >> thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, i inform the house that ms. salazar will vote nay on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from illinois rise? >> good morning, madam speaker, as the member designated by congressman troy carter, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yes on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote no on h.r. 2116. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that he will vo

mr. moulton of massachusetts and mr. suozzi of new york, i inform the house that those members will vote yes on h.r. 6865. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from delaware seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. trahan of massachusetts and ms. degette of colorado, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.r. 6865. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by eddie bernice johnson, congressman rush, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on h.r. 6865. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? mr. fleischmann: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. bilirakis of florida, i inform the house that mr. bilirakis will vote yea on h.r. 6865. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. carter: as the member designated by mr. taylor of texas, pursuant to h

mr. moulton, go ahead. guest: sorry, it dropped out on its own.ll the talk about "peanuts," i guess. in the land of 10,000 lakes, minnesota, go ahead. caller: i wanted to get some perspective on the ppp program. a small business, family owned business that is in the construction field -- restaurants and some of those places were hurt. they received like 300,000 loans . they came back, did not want to talk about it, and no protection for the workers. it was mentally very strange. i left my job. they talk about people leaving work, and they are not working. i think there is a lot of disappointment that people get money who did not need it, and we, the taxpayer, are paying for it. host: thanks for sharing your story. guest: there was, as i said at the start of our segment -- there was probably not nearly enough evaluation of need. we talked about verifying that the recipient was really who they said they were, but there is also this need that we overlooked in terms of money going out the door, but also in terms of forgiveness. we did not factor it in