mr. moy, i'm going to follow-up on mr.nnolly's comments about actually selling or being concerned about taiwan's defense capability, i guess. you said earlier i think with chairman chris smith questioning, you don't, when you make decisions you all don't consider beijing in your decisions, and you just reaffirms that with my colleague, mr. connolly. i think chris smith raise the issue of a one china policy. does it not bother you that that exists, that there are statements that people have made, high level officials have said they agreed on a one china policy? does the minister should not view that as a problem? >> our one china policy is one that has existed for several decades now. >> okay, well i take that as a no, but let me follow up with what gerry connolly said. so you haven't sold submarines yet. you don't take beijing into account. people around the world watch us, words and actions have consequences. would you agree that you all would be okay with a one russia policy when it comes to the crimea and the ukraine? i

i look forward to answering your questions. >> iq, mr. moy. there is one -- thank you, mr. moy.there is one really disappointing thing to me. i frequently speak to assistant secretary danny russell on the phone about different issues. i believe he intended to be here to testify. i believe i talked to him twice about it. but time after time, and this is something that the subcommittee on asia-pacific has talked to me about, for whatever reason, the administration pulls the witnesses, and i know it isn't a lack of engagement on the part of danny russell, because we have talked to him repeatedly about issues. thee is something about relationship here with the state department, when eliot engel and i make these requests, or the subcommittee chairman on the asia-pacific subcommittee, for some reason the witnesses are always canceled. what we want to talk about is iia policy, and as far as know, danny russell and i are in concurrence on a lot of these issues. further up inbout the ministration. so when i asked questions, for some reason, state department -- i'm going to ask the questi

mr. moy, i'm going to follow-up on mr.nnolly's comments about actually selling, or being concerned about taiwan's defense capability. that you don'tr -- when you make decisions, you don't consider beijing in your decisions and you just reaffirmed that with my colleague, mr. connolly. think chris raise the issue of a one-china policy. does it not bother you that that exists, that there are statements that people have made, high-level officials that said they agreed to a one-china policy? does the administration not view that as a problem? are one-china policy is one that existed for several decades. >> altaic that as a no. let me follow up -- i will take that as a no. let me follow up. you have a submarine sale. you don't take beijing into account. words and actions have consequences. would you agree that you would be ok with a one-russia policy when it comes to crimea and the ukraine? is that it can do the same kind of ideology? issuesn't speak to those , but again, we are obligated to provide those defense materials and s