mr. murawski at supervisor kim >> mr. murawski my mr. awski my summary notes from planning the zoning wheezed for the giants stadium at mission bay north? i hear both arguments. i could see how for some folks in their reading of nighttime entertainment use this arena might seem like a significant departure, but doesn't like the definition is broad enough, as you mentioned. there's no attendance or participant limitation in nighttime use that you could conceivably put an arena in this category, but i'm curious if we did apply specific use? to the giant stadium? >> supervisor kim, at the time the site of at&t ballpark was not in a redevelopment plan area. it wasn't-it was outside the boundary. so, at least the redevelopment agency at the time in the proposal was to put it into a redevelopment area. it cannot be done without an amendment >> but it did get the zoning, right? >> when the plan-when the ballpark >> weather was planted on or read about what was the zoning assigned to the giant stadium? >> was a particulars zoning that was amended

mr. murawski at supervisor kim >> mr. murawski my mr. awski my summary notes from planning the zoning wheezed for the giants stadium at mission bay north? i hear both arguments. i could see how for some folks in their reading of nighttime entertainment use this arena might seem like a significant departure, but doesn't like the definition is broad enough, as you mentioned. there's no attendance or participant limitation in nighttime use that you could conceivably put an arena in this category, but i'm curious if we did apply specific use? to the giant stadium? >> supervisor kim, at the time the site of at&t ballpark was not in a redevelopment plan area. it wasn't-it was outside the boundary. so, at least the redevelopment agency at the time in the proposal was to put it into a redevelopment area. it cannot be done without an amendment >> but it did get the zoning, right? >> when the plan-when the ballpark >> weather was planted on or read about what was the zoning assigned to the giant stadium? >> was a particulars zoning that was amended

mr. murawski at supervisor kim >> mr. murawski my mr. awski my summary notes from planning the zoning wheezed for the giants stadium at mission bay north? i hear both arguments. i could see how for some folks in their reading of nighttime entertainment use this arena might seem like a significant departure, but doesn't like the definition is broad enough, as you mentioned. there's no attendance or participant limitation in nighttime use that you could conceivably put an arena in this category, but i'm curious if we did apply specific use? to the giant stadium? >> supervisor kim, at the time the site of at&t ballpark was not in a redevelopment plan area. it wasn't-it was outside the boundary. so, at least the redevelopment agency at the time in the proposal was to put it into a redevelopment area. it cannot be done without an amendment >> but it did get the zoning, right? >> when the plan-when the ballpark >> weather was planted on or read about what was the zoning assigned to the giant stadium? >> was a particulars zoning that was amended

mr. murawski at supervisor kim >> mr. murawski my mr. awski my summary notes from planning the zoning wheezed for the giants stadium at mission bay north? i hear both arguments. i could see how for some folks in their reading of nighttime entertainment use this arena might seem like a significant departure, but doesn't like the definition is broad enough, as you mentioned. there's no attendance or participant limitation in nighttime use that you could conceivably put an arena in this category, but i'm curious if we did apply specific use? to the giant stadium? >> supervisor kim, at the time the site of at&t ballpark was not in a redevelopment plan area. it wasn't-it was outside the boundary. so, at least the redevelopment agency at the time in the proposal was to put it into a redevelopment area. it cannot be done without an amendment >> but it did get the zoning, right? >> when the plan-when the ballpark >> weather was planted on or read about what was the zoning assigned to the giant stadium? >> was a particulars zoning that was amended

mr. murawski my up with the hospital pay any taxes or a transit impact fees? >> president breed that's a good question. as you recall, one of the concerns at the time the hospital was proposed that it would take property off the tax rolls because it's a public use, and the mission bay redevelopment plan really only works through the generation of property tax to pay for public infrastructure, and affordable housing under the plan. so, the fact that the hospital would not be generating property tax revenue because it was exempt led to negotiations between the redevelopment agency and the uc regents to provide in lieu of payments that were equal to or exceeded the amounts property tax that would be-would've otherwise been available for both the infrastructure and for the affordable housing. in fact, the payments for the for the housing were quite significant and recently we have begun construction on the affordable housing. that was associated with the uc regents agreement to provide funding that was equivalent to the property tax revenues that would've gone to