mr. murdoch, about you. what do you make of that charge?w key, new york politics as usual. but i think, chris, what you're looking at is a larger trend here. you have within the republican party, you have a majority of people who have been angry at their incumbents. they've voted them out. they've voted in these amateurs and i've seen them, who really don't know how to behavior like politicians and sometimes that's refreshing. other times, it's really embarrassing. >> let's go up to maine to another center of activity. another ring in this fight game. paul lapaige. this scene also involves anger and tough talk. >> and as your governor, you're going to be seeing a lot of me on the front page, saying governor lapaige -- >> there's interesting language. let's take a look at paladino taking to kate snow. one or our reporters. >> it's okay. it's all right to show people that you're angry. it's sort of gets the discussion going. >> who are you angry at? >> angry at a government that took advantage of the people. a government that is self-sustaini

mr. murdoch -- >> murdoch has never been a limit on anything. [laughter] >> i should go stand over there on the far right. a senior fellow at the atlas economic research foundation and syndicated columnist at scripps howard news service and wind folks on the right or the far right the case may be gathered with sometimes diffident to beat ourselves as either conservatives or libertarians, and i'm wondering if the sharon conference, did you see those divisions and were they very distinct? word de miners differences or serious camps in the conservative on real veus libertarian sector? >> i don't remember that those were distinct cas at the time, the conservative and libertarian ideas. i just don't remember them being a critical issue. no. my answer would be no. >> i have to say those differences came out in the discussion of whether or not the wordgod should be in e statement, the sharon statement, and also those who were arguing against this inclusion did not identify themselves s libertarian, we knew that they were in fact libertarian. and so her

murdoch. incidentally the daughter in law of mr. rupert murdoch.> dramatic announcement. unfortunately it was the wrong announcement. >> so the winner, and australia's next top model for 2010 is -- >> it's you kelsey. >> i'm feeling a bit sick about this. no, i'm so sorry about this. oh, my god. i don't know what to say. this is not -- this was a complete accident. i'm so sorry. it's amanda. i'm so sorry. it was fed to me wrong. >> it's okay. >> it's okay. >> this is what happens when you have live tv, folks. i'm so sorry. >> remember "saturday night live." with the -- never mind. now the winner is the winner, but the loser now is going to win because the sympathy vote, as it should be, is going to go for that moment she thought she had it and then they took it away. >> bob, bob, this is just the cooler. >> no, we watch the show together friday night eating popcorn, bob and i. >> the loser, they said, was the winner. they gave her 25 grand and a trip to new york. >> we've got to run here. >> it was hard enough to watch. then to hear bob woodward an

mr. murdoch -- >> murdoch has never been a limit on anything. [laughter] >> i should go stand over there on the far right. a senior fellow at the atlas economic research foundation and syndicated columnist at scripps howard news service and wind folks on the right or the far right the case may be gathered with sometimes diffident to beat ourselves as either conservatives or libertarians, and i'm wondering if the sharon conference, did you see those divisions and were they very distinct? word de miners differences or serious cam in the conservative on real veus libertarian sector? >> i don't remember that those were distinct camps at the time, the conservative and libertarian ideas. i just don't remember them being a critical issue. no. my answer would be no. >> i have to say those differences came out in the discussion of whether or not the word god should be in the statement, the sharon statement, and also those who were arguing against this inclusion did not identify themselves as libertarian, we knew that they were in fact libertarian. and so

ways of the papers or where they come from and who owns them because rupert murdoch owns about everything right now. host: mr. colon's peahen's piec? hostcaller: right, and they are right-leaning. host: i think others would disagree with you. someone argue it tends to be more liberal. caller: maybe i am wrong on that. the thing on the taxes and everything. during world war ii the people were asked to make sacrifices to pay for the worst. whenever george bush started two different wars, no one has been asked to make the for sacrifice. host: i will leave it there. the piece you were talking about has been and other publications over the holiday weekend. it is called, "obama is shrinking preside's shrinking p" the speech clocked in at 2540 words. the present needs a staff to give him an oval office address unless he has something worthy of the oval office to say. either that or the way things are going, the american people will fire him. these other words of richard cohen. this morning we have open phones. democrats line. please go ahead. caller: mike comment today -- my comment today is about the lady that mad

mr. kristol manipulated this country into war in iraq. now he is trying to manipulate through his magazine and fox news, collaborating with rupert murdoch and dick armey. what he is trying to do, what they are not telling you, they want to destroy social security, medicare, any of the program could for the working class. host: could you identify what you mean by corporate autocracy -- corporatocracy? caller: calling a professional entity a personage. it is an effort to manipulate the money. it all comes back to money. if mr. crystal was honest, he would understand corporations in the country are sitting on trillions of dollars, not because they could not hire people, not because it would not be good for them to get the economy going, but they can continually make more profit by making the people who work for them work harder, longer, cheaper, management by intimidation. everybody is afraid of losing their job. host: thank you. bill kristol. guest: most of the corporation that i have dealt with seem perfectly hired to -- happy to hire people. i think the problem today is people are not convinced, given the objective economic situation in the