mr. nader, you mentioned over 12 years. someone needs to that you're about 2016 in your thoughts about it. especially in terms of you might billionaire. >> it looks right now if you wanted to guess it is the today he upset bush and hillary clinton. unless republicans want to implode on people like rubio workers. but the big business is going to get behind to bush. by the way, he is known to read a lot of books. [laughter] not as good of a painter. in the back. >> afternoon. jeff steele. notice skepticism given the argument could be made that the american system has been performing having to compete in the 20 century against who arguably very deformed system, not the germany and soviet communism. given that we -- given our power has had to have been built up to compete against those monstrous entities and we still have a one-party state in china and the argument is made that the month on -- the islamic caliphate risk is a monstrous threat, it easier that the status quo is because the power structure have been built and is di

mr. nader was very much involved in the drafting of legislation of the consumer product safety act, so the whole consumer movement helped from it as they come and as i say, that led to what a lot of people call the consumer decade, which lasted roughly from the days of the great society through the middle of the 1970's. host: a call from frances in new york on our line for independents. good morning for stop you're on with robert adler from the consumer product safety commission. caller: good morning. door in sliding glass my room, and the threshold is so , iterous, when i step on it slices my foot. how can i do something? out, and they gave a contract, but i complained about it to the commissioner and the contractor, and i got nowhere, but it is a dangerous door. guest: it is interesting you raise an issue with a sliding glass door because one of the first issues raised with with a product called architectural glass because if you walk into it and it breaks, it used to break and very dangerous

mr. nader, you mentioned the phrase 12 years.n't know if you were referring to two terms of hillary and one of chelsea, but i need to ask you about 2016 and your thoughts about it. >> what was the question? >> your thoughts about 2016, especially in terms of the enlightened billionaire. >> looks like right now, if you want to guess, it's the two dynasties, jeb bush and hillary clinton. unless the republicans want to implode on people like rubio or cruz. but the big business is going to get behind jeb bush. by the way, he is different than george w. bush. he is known to read a lot of books. >> not as good a painter, though. in the back. >> good afternoon, jeff seal. given the argue accommodate be made that the american system has been deformed and having to compete in the 20th century against two arguably very deformed systems, nazi germany and soviet communism. given that we -- given that our power structure has had to have been built up to compete against those monstrous entities, and we still have a one-party state in china, an

mr. nader was very much involved in the drafting of legislation of the consumer product safety act, so the whole consumer movement helped from it as they come and as i say, that led to what a lot of people call the consumer decade, which lasted roughly from the days of the great society through the middle of the 1970's. host: a call from frances in new york on our line for independents. good morning for stop you're on with robert adler from the consumer product safety commission. caller: good morning. door in sliding glass my room, and the threshold is so , iterous, when i step on it slices my foot. how can i do something? out, and they gave a contract, but i complained about it to the commissioner and the contractor, and i got nowhere, but it is a dangerous door. guest: it is interesting you raise an issue with a sliding glass door because one of the first issues raised with with a product called architectural glass because if you walk into it and it breaks, it used to break and very dangerous

nader is off the table. so i think he's dangerous but think is dangerous in a very confined way. >> well, i think i'm a little more skeptic about mr. putin then maybe all of you. i have chaired the bulgarian transition team back in 90-93, and have been an advisor when he was the first non-congress prime minister of russia. besides the beginning of this year, even though i'm economic columnist, at times i write about energy and other things, and i have done several articles about how europe was captive to soviet oil and gas. most of russia's hard currents or export our oil and gas, most of the going to western europe and particularly the southern, western european countries are almost totally hostage to a gap coming through ukraine. from my old contacts i had received a message about how certain members of a bulgarian parliament, basically the socialist party, the green party and even the turkish party, were receiving payments to vote against fracking in bulgaria. northern bulgaria is contiguous to romania, bulk area should be an oil and gas exporter that should not be totally dependent on russian gas. this reminded me very much of