with that, i would like to recognize mr. neil -- >> mr. chairman, can i respond to that? that was not your time, i think that was someone else's time. >> actually, that was my time, miss moore. we'll go ahead to mr. neil. >> thank you. i think you hit some very important points. job training, health care, transportation, daycare. the other agreement that we had when -- in '96 that was really very far reaching, and maybe you can speak to it, because you invited the question, but what about the role of child support? we do a good job of trying to enforce child support here. maybe if you can give us a practical assessment of that. >> thank you for asking that, because i'm a huge fan of child support. as a matter of fact, for several years the only bipartisan amendment that's passed out of the subcommittee has been me and mr. ryan's amendment to try to do 100% pass through of child support to a custodial parent. i'm a huge fan of child support, particularly since all of the other sorts of supports are wanting. so i think child support is very important. i want to respond to s

mr. neil's account of the dinner apart from it going apparently very well, mr. murdoch indicated his newspapers were not wedded to the toris. does that chime with your recollection? >> not specifically that dinner. i think -- it was clear that there was an openness that hadn't been before because of the way i was changing the labor party. i think -- i actually put the clause at that point, i think out there. you know, it was obvious i was going to be different type of labor leader. >> and then you apparently indicated that media ownership rules would not be onerous under labor. is it possible that you said that? >> i think not onerous is not the way i would have put it. i can't specifically remember what was said. but it's perfectly possible. if that issue came up, i would have said that's not an issue we're going to be taking on. >> so whar the position, by it be end of that dinner, mr. murdoch would have had some degree of comfort from you at least in this particular domain, are we agreed about that? >> yeah. but i don't know that he would have particularly ta

the chair recognizes mr. neil from massachusetts. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, just to follow up. one of the reasons that data suggests that the welfare reform act of '96 here worked was in some measure because we added a number of mitigating issues to the overall package, including job training, child care and not to miss the point, people were able to keep their health insurance. that had a profound impact on that flexibility. i'm not going to trespass into domestic politics in the uk, but just having observed 3,000 miles away the prime minister, during his election cycle, he suggested a much more radical transformation of the health care system in the uk than he was able to deliver on. and i understand that, because that's just the reality of what happens. but i think as followthrough, i think the prime minister probably discovered that the health care system in the uk was pretty popular. is that a fair statement? >> you've got to understand from the standpoint of the ushg, in this area, it's quite different from where you are here. there's no ques

. >> mr. neil as attributed something that you said to him. page 15 of this bundle this is the introduction to the paper back edition of his book "full disclosure." he says about ten lines down, blair once said to me, quote, how we treat rupert murdoch's media interest when in power will depend how his papers treat the labor party in the run up to the election. might you have said that to him. >> i don't recall saying that, frankly pg i think the general tone of ma i might well have said to him, look, if rupert murdoch's going to wage war on us, we're going to stand up to him. you know, all the way through, for me as it were the issue of media interest other than the fact as at the very outset, i had taken a strategic decision i was not going to put this forefront of our program as a government, you know, i was as it were that was not my issue. so, you know, i don't think it's a question of media interest, but had they -- as i'm saying to chris mullen back then and i don't again recall precisely the words i used. there's no doubt at all if wha

so on behalf of mr. neil, they talk about new market tax credit quite a bit. he would like you specifically to comment on the gao's recommendation on this issue. would you please do that? >> as i have said before, we certainly have to look for every way to make the new markets tax credit more efficient and effective and the community welcomes scrutiny and evaluation and appreciates all that the gao has done to point out areas the program can be strengthened but do have concerns about shifting to a grant program but that would be around the issue of leveraging private sector investment and how critical that is to get the private sector involved in these distressed communities, investing in low-income neighborhoods. this is a highly targeted tax credit benefiting thousands of low income people and low-income neighborhoods in california as well. it is up program that also brings oversight from the private sector. this is true in the low income housing tax credit. you are getting market discipline imposed and having another set of eyes on this project in underlini

>>neil: would your plans, mr. chairmans look into what jeb bush has said, a balance?es not even have to be a fair balance, it could be one dollar in revenue for every $9 or $10 in cuts to paraphrase him he would sign up for that. would you? >>guest: here is the problem with this dialogue. you never get the spending cuts. president obama's budget, the tax increases do not pay for a fifth of the proposed deficit. >>neil: you would never entertain that ratio? >>guest: i am not going to say or negotiate with myself. i don't see the point in negotiating with myself on rain shower shows when we are talking about comprehensive tax reform and getting spending under control but our fends want to pocket the higher revenue and never give up the lower spending so what is happening they want to increase revenue and pile it into month spending which drives us deeper into a hole. here is the point: we are going to bring a bill to the floor in july and it says extend the country code for a year. yes, have a fast track procedure to actually get fundamental tax reform. we are working w

the crew 205 trillion miles away from earth, not half a billion which neil points out would put them only just past jupiter. okay, mr. big shot astronomer. we get it. you have a gps. you know where all the gas stations are between here and alpha centare. but nation, i'm not just annoyed, i'm also terrified. because if neil degrasse tyson points out everything inaccurate in movies and this was the only mistake he found, that can mean only one thing, everything else in prometheus is true. the xenomorphs are coming for us. oh my god, charlize theron was here last week and i shook her hand. i'm infected! oh, oh, oh! kill me! oh, what's this. what's this coming out of me. it's just my belly. it's just my-- i had-- oh. >> (cheers and applause) had wings for lunch. still, neil, as a friend, do me a favor, and don't go see madagascar 3. i don't want to find out that zebra was lip syncing. now nation, you know me, you know the show, you know i'm a good catholic. so naturally i keep up with the latest church news. the hottest vestments for summer. how to spruce up your nar-- narthex and the latest visitation of our lord this

crash who can survive and prosper in a deflationary depression and before the break mr parker we were talking about neil's these record lows that we've seen for a ten year treasury yields as just one benchmark so you predict that ultimately we will see interest rates rise but in the interim how low do you think we could see these treasury yields go. well we think they're pretty much making bottom as we speak and this is a different change of opinion over the past thirty years that we have many indications right now that they've gone a little bit. to the point where people are now embracing the trend you know as you know all last year and in the first few months of this year people just hated the bottom or they said this is the worst everybody knows rates are going up you don't want to know about bonds well now they're embracing them the latest figure we just saw from the d.s.i. the daily sentiment index on bunsen which is a poll of futures traders shows a ninety seven percent of them are bullish now the first time we got into the ninety's we last august it's been hovering in that area with a few periods o

attention, and it just fits in very much like this, and this was a statement by james neil, who was the main prosecutor. mr. mardian's lawyer, david bress, who had been the u.s. attorney of the district of columbia in the middle of the trial became very ill, and mardian moved for sever rens at that point because his lawyer, david bress, became very ill, and i think this is very responsive. james neil responded this way. i'm just reading from my book. this is a terribly personal problem for me. i know dave bress. i have always liked dave. i'm terribly saddened by the fact he is seriously ill. okay? then he says, however, that as long as i am representing the government, i will not oppose this motion to sever. this is not based on my legal grounds. this is based on my own personal respect for david bress. all right? so to me what happened there was that the prosecutor, james neil, made a decision that was based on a factor other than the law. all right? the law he felt was clear that severance was not appropriate, but that out of respect of his own personal respect, he would not have the government oppose th

mr. dimon did pretty darn well. let's bring in neil wineberg and bob pisani. 's give him a grade on the performance from mr. dimon. what do you think, bob? you start. >> everybody came in thinking, sue, that jamie dimon would get the living daylights beaten out of him. he didn't. he answered every question in a short, assured manner. he wasn't disrespectful. look what he did. instead of concentrating on the mistake, he admitted he went forward and ended up with policy discussions. this is a win for him. >> you agree, neil? >> he got to talk about the things that he has problems with, he doesn't like the volcker rule. thinks we have this -- hash spaghetti pile of regulation and kind of turned the agenda in what the banking industry want to talk about. >> i think it was interesting. he didn't lose his temper, wasn't cocky and a couple questions where the senators were not well informed in terms of some of the facts. and he resisted the temptation to fire back at them. >> they don't know -- look. the congress doesn't know how to manage the trades, either. the bott

neil: mr. ghulam nabi azad, minister for health and family welfare; mr.ntek ahluwalia, deputy chairman, planning commission; mrs. krishna tirath, minister of state for women and child development; mr. ashwani kumar, minister of state for planning, science and technology and earth sciences; and mr. sam pitroda, public information, infrastructure and innovation advisor to prime mr. ghulam nabi azad, minister for health and family welfare; mr. montek ahluwalia, deputy chairman, planning commission; mrs. krishna tirath, minister of state for women and child development; mr. ashwani kumar, minister of state for planning, science and technology and earth sciences; and mr. sam pitroda, public information, infrastructure and innovation advisor to prime minister. >> i am also pleased to be joined by the most senior officers in the government of india. even by the high standards of the india and u.s. relationship, we have had an unprecedented intensity of engagement over the past years. if a strategic dialogue is a unique opportunity to bring together all the threa

we have neil who is with you a on thea and the human rights commission advisory board and mr. al norman with the baby emergence. if you could both line up right here and we'll have neil go first. >> good morning. i have two minutes. so this is my "american idol." are you guys ready? yeah. first of all, i would like to thank the mayor and our supervisors for coming out and everybody for showing up. the last time i was here was in the seventh grade in the production of hare. -- "hair." i'm 54. so this is really a trip. redevelopment. it's gone. our street is a ghost town. if you've seen leyland avenue, it's beautiful. we have a green way. it's beautiful. but we have a lot of empty storefronts. and with the redevelopment gone, it's probably going to get worse. how many here in district 11 has ever come down and spent a dollar on leyland avenue? great. i spend a lot of money in the mission. because there are places to go. and we need places to go in mid valley. we have a lot of services for minorities. i'm a minority. sfaft -- as a matter of fact, i'm a single dad. i'm disabled. i'

neil munro. and this sparked a firestorm of liberals and conservatives alike. >> mr. munro was absolutely wrong in interfering with the president's statement, talking points all say you must respect the office of the presidency even if you don't like the person in it. the idea that you would interrupt the president in the middle of prepared remarks and shout a question, i think it's outrage us. >> how dare you. >> how dare you. how dare you, neil munro,. neil munro did knowingly interrupt the president. as he explained to completely independent news organization the one he worked for. >> from your perspective, the speech was coming to a close when you were beginning to ask your question. >> yes. it's hard to know when he's about to end. i thought he was going to end today. i asked my question too early. >> stephen: hey, you got to admit it's hard to know when obama is going to end something. folks, the president, the president's pauses are so long it always seems like he's wrapping up his speech. remember the state of the union. >> they know our way of life will only

mr. blaine and -- the southern -- >> okay. >> we'll take it in this room, neil. residence in washington, d.c. >> yes. in 1881, when blaine became secretary of state, he decided to build a large gilded mansion on dupont circle, and that house is still standing today. and it was a house that he only kept for a few years, and then, of course, in the post-1884 election, he and his wife traveled a lot. and it was at that same time after giving up the washington residence that they i built another big guilded age victorian summer cottage on bar harbor, maine. then when he became secretary of state, for the last time, he actually acquired secretary of state william sewell's house near the white house, near lafayette square. that's the house he died in 1893. >> he had sold the dupont circle house. >> yes. >> i mean, he -- he was there for a very short time. he had one of his daughters was married there. his wife hated the place. it is absolutely mammoth. it is still standing on massachusetts avenue. >> 2000 massachusetts a in washington, d.c. interested in james g. blain

. >> while trying to explain his position on immigration, neil monroe shouted questions to the president. he asked why mr. obama would want foreigners in the country instead of giving jobs to americans. >> and the answer to your question, sir, and the next time i prefer you let me finish my statements before you ask that question, if this is the right thing to do for the american people. i didn't ask for an argument, i'm answering your question. it is the right thing to do for the american people and here's why. >> the president visibly agitated there, monroe has since released a statement of his own saying he thought the president was closing hiss remarks, and he had no intention of interrupting him, he just wanted to get in his question. >>> nbc bay area's joe rizzata junior has -- >> for almost all of her 24 years, laura lopez has lived in napa. she went to high school surrounded by rolling -- though she thinks -- i have a degree from a university of california that i've been waiting to use. >> without residency, lopez can't work out her dream job, so she works at her parents restaurant worried she ma

mr. donaldson's statement that neil monroe was interrupting the president of the united states because hemment. >> let's face it, many on the political right believe this president ought not to be there. they oppose him not just for his policies and political view but for who he is, an african-american. finally, the elephant in the rose garden. thank you, sam donaldson, enough said there. >> really? sam donaldson goes on to say, he says some people and news organizations encourage disrespect for the president and he called out rush limbaugh for doing that. >> here is bernie goldberg with bill o'reilly last night weighing in on this. >> do you really think that those people you call right wing bigots, racists, do you really think they'd be racist toward a black man, a conservative black man who was president of the united states? i think they'd love him. i think they'd love him. and i think if you think about it for a second, sam, you might agree with that. >> in "the examiner" today, they write "calling someone a racist is far easier than formulating a defense for the policies put forth b

neil monroe, i think he is a jerk. there's actually been some genuine bipartisan agreement on mr. ns there. >> i would hope so. i mean, no one questions the right of any american, but particularly a journalist asking the president of the united states questions. where neil monroe crossed the line by a mile is by questioning the president before he even finished -- before he even finished speaking, one, and also, yelling out a question where he knew questions wouldn't be -- wouldn't be entertained. >> shut up, jonathan. i'm asking you a question. no, i'm interrupting you. shut up. crystal. on fox they were questioning a parallel where reagan had a similar kind of conflict. as i understand it, it actually finished. >> yeah. similar except for one important thing, which is that he had actually finished his statement before the question was lobbed. you know, credit where credit is due. it's good to see some criticism from fox news to monroe. i guess being a jerk is sort of like pornography. it's hard to define, but when you see it, you know it. you know it when you see it. i think that

mr. curry's comments came during a senate banking hearing on the implementation of the dodd-frank regulatory law. others testifying include deputy treasury secretary neil woland and federal reserve board member daniel turulo. >> this is part of the committee's continued oversight of the implementation of the wall street reform act and is also an opportunity to discuss the implications of the laws recently announced by jpmorgan chase. they announced it has lost millions of dollars in a large trade designed to reduce the firm's risk. it reminds us that no financial institution is immune from bad judgment. while the jp morgan trading loss does not appear to have caused systemic problems, it's a clear reminder that wall street continues to need better risk management, oversight, and if the rules are broken, unyielding enforcement. to repeal or weaken wall street reform and to fund, would take us back to the days before the financial crisis of 2008. wall street reform was a response to the crisis caused by a lack of consumer protection, reckless behavior in the financial sector, and the regulators who failed to take action in time. we now have an agency sol

. >> bill: neil monroe from the web site daily caller is the man the president scolded. mr. monroe was absolutely wrong with interfering with the president's statement. as talking points always says you must respect the office of the presidency even if you don't like the person in it mr. obama was correct in calling munroe out. that's the memo. top story tonight. with us anchor lou dobbs. you and i have been covering in immigration thing for years. we both have the mind set the federal government has the responsibility to uphold immigration law. secure the borders, make sure there is not chaos down there. make sure people who come here are documented so we know who they're and where they are. that's the law of the land. if you want to change the law of the land? get congress to change it so you and i agree on that. >> absolutely. >> bill: having said that president obama now says look, this crew isn't really responsible for what happened to them. there are children here and you can't just throw them out and you say? i see what happened in the last six months. this is the pre

>>neil: look forward to seeing how it stands out. thank you very much, mr. chairman.hing, both sides getting that advise. . our cloud is not soft and fluffy. our cloud is made of bedrock. concrete. and steel. our cloud is the smartest brains combating the latest security threats. it spans oceans, stretches continents. and is scalable as far as the mind can see. our cloud is the cloud other clouds look up to. welcome to the uppernet. a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually ease arthritis sympto. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. celebrex can be taken with or without food. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benets with theisks. all prescription n