mr. netanyahu was trying to ensure. is there any putting together of a plan is says to iran, not one more inch? as we move forward, you will see there will be massive retaliation if there is action and we will make sure that they have success and will be viable and strong against whatever efforts iran has in iraq? to lay out the plan of let people know, let iran know in advance i think would help create a better sense of confidence that there is a reason to stand with us. >> i think that is extremely important. that is what countries are looking for. that continued commitment of the united states to help them are tech themselves so they could sleep well at night and maintain the regional role and counter iran's malign influence and activities. the recognize what has been set up here. it would be an enormous problem. they are supportive of an agreement. at the same time, they want to make sure that we are there. that is what the countries were told. it is to solidify all of the things -- >> and just about out of time. >>

mr. netanyahu's trip to the congress was rather unprecedented. >> and unwise? >> well, you can ask him that. here's what i think. i think most important thing is we'll have a new president in january of 1917. i mean 2017. i believe the nuclear agreement with iran is on balance the right thing to do because i don't believe that an iranian nuclear capacity now would be just iran. i think there would be one to four other states that would get nuclear power in the middle east. i think you'd have race on by all these various non-state actors and it could billie a nightmare. i also think ten years is a very long time. a lot of people say ten years from now they'll do what they're doing now. in 1979, if somebody told you that the berlin wall would fall and the soviet union would come to an end in ten years, nobody would have believed that. a lot can happen in ten years. furth furthermore, even with the sanctions on the iranians kept supporting their conventional military build up and the capacity of hezbollah. it's very important to be tough in enforcing it. the snap

mr. netanyahu about the benefits of the agreement, i do not question for a moment the basis of his concern or that of any israeli. >> that conciliatory message was undercut somewhat by a tweet from the white house, which mocked the 2012 speech by netanyahu. >> where should a red line be drawn? a red line should be drawn right here. before, before iran completes the second stage of nuclear enrichment necessary to make a bomb. >> the tweet from the @therawndeal account says, this is what the progress looks now, at zero pers with the fuse snipped with a pair of scissors. now the goal is to make sure the 34 votes in the senate remain firm and maybe just maybe pick up sevennen more senators who would sign on to supporting the bill. that would give the administration and the democrats in the senate the ability to filibuster and avoiding any disappointment of having the bill go to the white house. antonio. >> what is the issue over filibuster? >> to find those seven senators, even though democrats have signed onto the bill as i've said holding their nose. they also feel it is wrong to deny the ri

mr. netanyahu's outlook on life. one can't predict that it will be the same, but one can hope that. hoping for that isn't necessarily going to make it possible. my own view is that israel will sooner or later have to learn to live with the agreement. the president's, but i would call on restraint commitments -- would call on restraint -- unrestrained commitments to defend themselves in light of a changing situation in the middle east has been the bedrock of keeping equality in the hands of israel. that should not change. i think mr. netanyahu made a serious mistake in trying to polarize support for israel between the american political parties. not a wise idea. anybody who spent time inrelationship, and i certainly have in my time in service and israel, thinks that was not a wise or helpful issue. supportingpening in the president, where we have come is interesting. it will be more interesting to see whether in fact the democrats will get enough votes to block closure. that too, would be very interesting. it will be a hard slog. the relationship between the u.s. and israel is embedd

mr. netanyahu about the benefits of the agreement, i do not question for a minute the basis of his concern or that of any israeli. >> but that conciliatory message was undercut somewhat by an e-an account run by the white house from twitter. >> why where should a red line be drawn? a red line should be drawn right here. before before iran completes the second stage of nuclear enrichment necessary to make a bomb. >> the tweet from the @the iran deal account, shows this is where it looks now, with the progress towards a bomb at zero percent, with the fuse snipped by a pair of scissors. >> that would ensure that a filibuster could prevent any republican backed measure of disapproval from even getting to the desk of the presidents, thus preventing him from having to use his veto pen. >> thank you, jamil jaffer, george mason school of law. in washington tonight. jamil, first of all a lot of people are calling this a win for the president. is it? >> thanks for having me. i don't think it is a win for president. what is also clear is the house and the senate will disprove this deal, with bipartis

mr. netanyahu because realistically, the relationship between the united states and israel has been rockye obama administration. it is probably at its low point right now. i think the people of israel need and deserve much more reassurance than they've gotten from this administration about the role of the united states in protecting israel at this time when iran is still, you know, having protests in the street, chanting death to america, and death to israel, and yet the president is going to give them all of this additional money in iran, which i know they're going to be using, i expect they'd be using for terrorism, not to build hospitals or roads or schools. that is one of the biggest problems with this. and additionally, the president has come out yesterday against the exporting of crude oil, but yet going to lift the sanctions so iran can export crude oil. it's hypocritical. lou: senator, always good to talk with you, thanks for being with us tonight. senator john barrasso. >> thanks for having me. lou: this just in, breaking news, in santiago, chile. the entire coast of chile is now

mr. netanyahu and mr. putin? >> well, russia has dramatically upped its coverage and involvement in the syrian crise over the last 6 six weeks. there is a growing concerns to israelis. the amount of weapons now, the tap has been turned on and amount of weapons substantially increased. these are very highly sophisticated weapons, and the fear in germ is of course that these weapons may somehow get into the hands of what the israeli's call terror groups. they are very concerned about the s.a.22. it is operated by russian troops, but israel is very concerned that it could end up in the hands of assad ally hezbollah. putin will continue to support president assad. >> of course they both claim to have a common enemy, don't they, isil, and that is the justification that russia has used for the extension of its military presence in syria. >> it's really at the heart of a diplomatic plan that is being pushed be very hard by putin and his foreign minister sergey lavrov. putin wants the west to see assad's army against the

mr. netanyahu is trying to ensure. as you look at it, is there any putting together a plan that says to iran, not one more inch? as we move forward you will see from year to year that in yemen, not one more inch? that we will stand with the sunni tribal leaders to make sure they have success and will be viable and strong against whatever efforts iran has in iraq. to lay out the plan, let people know, let iran know in advance would help create a better sense of confidence that there is a reason, that there is a reason to stay with us. mr. carter: i think that is extremely important. that is what the gcc countries are looking for, namely the continued commitment of the united states to help them protect themselves so they can sleep well at night, maintain our regional role, counter iran's malign influence, and activities. at the same time they recognize perfectly well what has been set up here, iran with nuclear weapons would be an indoor miss -- would be an enormous problem. at the same time, they want to make sure we a

mr. netanyahu's visit to the united is the impression of the between enduring bonds the united states and and the uncooperative cooperation -- and the cooperation. scarlet: given a fierce critic nuclear deal. earlier this year he addressed congress to try to derail it. the census bureau, 33 million people were uninsured in 2013. that is down from almost 32 million -- 42 million 2013. secretary resizing china for the land reclamation projects in the china agency. he calls them out of step. china's actions have put it at odds with the economic and the philippines. carter calls for an immediate and reformation by all nations. the u.s. weighing an offer from russia to have military to military talks on the situation in syria. that is according to john kerry. the white house, state department and the pentagon are all considering it. those are your top stories. in the business world, a possible make a deal brewing in beer industry. if the deal goes through, it would create a company that would control half of the industry's profits. earlier today mark crumpton campbell inatthew london and the s

mr. netanyahu qowld like to have you adopt the nightmarish view that the agreement facilitates it. but there's nothing in the agreement. i won't get into details on this but there's nothing in the agreement that facilitates that. so it is extremely important the record of nonproliferation so far is -- that what happens in nearby counties with respect to civil nuclear power, does not drive the nearby countries to a weapon's posture. the second point that's very important here michael reys kelsey raised it. ariel in his own way raised. what happens after 15, 25 years, important piece addition to what kelsey said, that iran has some interest in nuclear power. they have, in fact, bought a reactor twice. once from germany, and secondly from russia. the russian policy is -- no reactor without a strong commitment to provide fuel and take back spent fuel that ought to become the gold standard. and anybody who is selling reactors to iran should insist on that gold standard. that takes away this wonderful idea in iran that we have to put in all kinds of low enrismed uranium and many centrifu

mr. netanyahu was trying to ensure. is there any putting together of a plan is says to iran, not one more inch? as we move forward, you will see there will be massive retaliation if there is action and we will make sure that they have success and will be viable and strong against whatever efforts iran has in iraq? to lay out the plan of let people know, let iran know in advance i think would help create a better sense of confidence that there is a reason to stand with us. >> i think that is extremely important. that is what countries are looking for. that continued commitment of the united states to help them are tech themselves so they could sleep well at night and maintain the regional role and counter iran's malign influence and activities. the recognize what has been set up here. it would be an enormous problem. they are supportive of an agreement. at the same time, they want to make sure that we are there. that is what the countries were told. it is to solidify all of the things -- >> and just about out of time. >>

mrs. ifill. >> bibi netanyahu, the prime minister. >> that's right. >> i want to give a miss to president obama whipped up fears about climate change and said nothing about the chinese ships off the coast. i don't know what you're worried about, paul, but i'm not worried about something that may happen a hundred years from now and a lot more worried about the chinese patrolling off of our coast. >> all right, james? >> on a serious note, at this time of the year i like to give a miss to espn for televising the little league world series. it's largely a competition to see which kids hit puberty first. it's ridiculous, but of course the espn also bounced curt schilling from the broadcast who actually has real achievements, not that espn would know the difference. >> what do you want, ozzie rules football in place of the little league? >> yes. >> remember, if you have your own hit or miss, tweet it to us. that's it for this week's show. thanks to my panel and all of you for watching. i'm paul gigot. i hope to see you here next week. >>> thousands of middle eastern and african migrants continue to

mr. benjamin netanyahu wants to make sure advanced weaponry doesn't fall into he is bo la's hands.final hours of a little girl found dead in boston. prosecutors claim she was murdered by her mother's boyfriend who thought she was a deem demon. the details just ahead. [engine ] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ where their electricity comes from. they flip the switch-- and the light comes on. it's our job to make sure that it does. using natural gas this power plant can produce enough energy for about 600,000 homes. generating electricity that's cleaner and reliable, with fewer emissions-- it matters. ♪ if you can't put a feeling into words, why try? philips sonicare leaves your mouth with a level of clean like you've never felt before, making it the most loved electric toothbrush brand by americans and their dentists. innovation and you. philips sonicare. >> jokvolkswagen's ceo said the screwed up. they've been accused of cheating. "the wall street journal" and others report volkswagen could be facing a criminal probe. officials say volkswagen programmed some diesel fuelled cars to emit lower e missions whe

mr. president, that leads me to israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu's 2013 united nations speech which mr. derschwitz argues was distorted by "the new york times." the prime minister said -- quote -- "last friday iranian president hasan rouhani assured us that in pursuit of its nuclear program, iran -- and this is a quote -- "iran has never chosen deceit and secrecy. never chosen deceit and secrecy." well, in 2002, iran was caught red handed secretly building an underground sent tiewj facility in netanz. and then in 2009, iran was again caught ret handed secretly building a huge underground nuclear facility for uranium enrichment in a mountain year quam. what strikes me about the prime minister's words are is it gives us a full picture of who we're dealing with in iran. last week the ayatollah khamenei predicted that israel will not exist in 25 years and referred to the united states as the great satan. what level of trust can we have for this regime? even if this agreement were a good deal for the united states, what makes us think that iran will abide by the terms of the deal? in oth

mr. obama and prime minister benjamin netanyahu will discuss the controversial iranian nuclear accord.netanyahu's visit to the united states is a deep demonstration of the deep and enduring bonds between the united states and israel, as well as our unprecedented cooperation to further enhance israel's security. mark: prime minister netanyahu is a fierce critic of the iran accord. earlier this year he addressed congress in an effort to derail the deal. the u.s. defense secretary is criticizing china for its land reclamation projects in the south china sea freight ashton carter calls beijing quote out of step with international rules by militarizing disputed reefs. china's actions have put it at odds with vietnam and the philippines. secretary carter called for an immediate halt to reclamation spy all nations. the affordable care act helped lower the share of people without health insurance in the united states last year. the census bureau says 33 million people were uninsured in 2014. that is down from almost 42 million the year before. last year was the first time he will begin enrolli

israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, who is also in new york, he's going to be giving his speech to the united nations tomorrow on wednesday, he put out a statement after mr. abbas' speech, a very statement that said this, abbas' speech was filled with falsehoods that will only promote and incite in the middle east. the israelis are looking at this speech thinking what exactly is mr. abbas going to do. >> the latest there at the moment. thank you. >> well, when you look in detail at president abbas' speech, how do you read what he exactly said. what did he really mean by this. >> to clarify, i wa as was just said, the language used was very ambiguous. it's not known if the plo is terminating the oslo agreement. it is only a threat that if certain measures are not met, some measures will be taken in that direction. >> surely he's risking a lot if this is an empty threat, isn't he? >> he's risking a lot if it's an empty threat, that's true. but it's similar language that has been used for the past two years, probably not in the u.n. not in international format, but in local meetings and interviews he has mentioned, he has raised these points before that the

mr. kimball if he knows that the israeli prime minister has been to the other countries and addressed their congress in reference to stopping this deal? guest: to my knowledge, prime minister netanyahu has not gone to the parliaments of the other countries. he has met with the leaders of these other countries involved in the negotiations. what he was clearly trying to do this year was to influence congressional opinion against the agreements. because he felt he had the ability to try to do that. there has not been the kind of debate in germany, france, or the u.k., russia, china certainly, that we have had here about the agreement, in part because all parts of the political spectrum in our three european allies have been in support of this. because they see this as the best possible outcome to prevent iran from getting a nuclear weapon. personally, i am puzzled about prime minister netanyahu's approach. it is not consistent with all of his military and security leaders. some of whom reluctantly think this is the best possible outcome to prevent iran from getting nuclear weapons. whatever the disagreements were between prime minister netanyahu and president obama in the past, i think

mr. there may actually be a filibuster so the votes never happen. so we got saudi arabia and gulf ally with us and netanyahus a much better weekend for them. >> all right. because it's a lightning round i want to make sure we get to all of our topics. so joanna, take to you puerto rico if only we could go there at this moment. >> i will take puerto rico over saudi arabia. >> our ed henry is there but also senator rubleio running on the g.o.p. side and secretary hillary clinton there as well. they are both there to talk about the debt crisis, the healthcare crisis. the problems in puerto rico. but why is that such an important place for them both to be? >> i think it's kind of a bank shot, right? because puerto rico actually does not get to vote for president of the united states but it does have a primary. at the same time puerto ricos make up a huge part of the hispanic vote particularly in places like florida. there is a lot of back and forth between puerto rico and various statessen the east coast. so i think for the rubio people this was a great opportunity for him not so much to win over puerto ricans

mr. crowe is about as pro-hitler as netanyahu.pportive of the country's jewish population, they should oppose the iranian deal. >> if you're a democrat are you happy that debbie wasserman schultz is still running the dnc? do you think this is the last straw for you and it's time for another message? >> seems like -- >> straight ahead on this friday -- >> ladies imagine big government as your boyfriend? >> hmm. dreamy. >> racking up $40,000 in student debt. you forced me into a health care plan i couldn't afford. you ruined my business. >> john stossel says you need to dump him and fast. he's here with some priceless dating advice, kind of. allergies distracting you? when your symptoms start... ...doctors recommend taking claritin every day of your allergy season. claritin provides powerful, non-drowsy, 24-hour relief for... ...fewer interruptions from the amazing things you do... ...every day. live claritin clear. to take their act to the next level... before earning 1% cash back everywhere, every time... 2% back at the grocery st

mr. there may actually be a filibuster so the votes never happen. so we got saudi arabia and gulf ally with us and netanyahustaying quiet. it's a much better weekend for them. >> all right. because it's a lightning round i want to make sure we get to all of our topics. so joanna, take to you puerto rico if only we could go there at this moment. >> i will take puerto rico over saudi arabia. >> our ed henry is there but also senator rubleio running on the g.o.p. side and secretary hillary clinton there as well. they are both there to talk about the debt crisis, the healthcare crisis. the problems in puerto rico. but why is that such an important place for them both to be? >> i think it's kind of a bank shot, right? because puerto rico actually does not get to vote for president of the united states but it does have a primary. at the same time puerto ricos make up a huge part of the hispanic vote particularly in places like florida. there is a lot of back and forth between puerto rico and various statessen the east coast. so i think for the rubio people this was a great opportunity for him not so much to win o

netanyahu is visiting moscow says something in and of itself. >> that's an extraordinary telling move. won oners what exactly he is tries to at the mr. obama.ems that he's saying we floe who the actor is, and we'll get to the bystanders sect. >> that's a byproduct of the iran deal. russia wall street making arms deals before the ink was dry, and if they're an important enough place, bibi netanyahu has to deal with them. >> >>> were more shot today from this hearing. here is senator shahin on this issue about russia. >> are we assessing whether we should take a different response with respect to assad and engaging with the syrian troops to get a political trans, while retaining the government structure so you don't have chaos on the ground, russia with its relationship with the regime could potentially contribute to helping find that solution. >> it is astonishing, charles, russia is helping assad. and this is an administration person who says they're going to help get rid of assad. not only that, do you remember how many times president obama said his names are numbered? >> obama's days are number, but not assad. look, what we are seeing he

netanyahu lobbied hard it appeal it. >> this thursday's washington post, mr. merkel vigorously backed the deal. saying they have no expectation that iran will change its behavior on the international stage but the deal does not depend on trusting iran. rather that wrote, it's based on detailed tightly-written controls that are verifiable and long-lasting. >>> a court in seoul, south korea sentenced kim to jail for attempted murder and assault an envoy. he was angry about military drills between the u.s. and south korea. lip ert needed 80 stitches to his jaw. he was about to deliver a speech when kim attacked him. the singapore voters are headed to the polls in the most competitive election in the city state's history. for the first time since independent in 1965, they are contesting all 89 seats. >> current prime minister loong has been in charge since 1994. but there is growing discontent, over waeeakening economy, and immigration levels. >>> this time taking a jab at carly fiorina forow candidates holding back. one candidate calling trump shallow even ego ma

repeatedly has rebuffed overtures from israel's prime minister, netanyahu, to return to the table to discuss a mutually agreeable resolution. mr. speaker, we have seen this over the past several years. a sight unseemly and unbecoming, but the administration publicly admonish and insult our ally israel and our leaders apply a false moral equivalency between israel and the palestinians. yet when it comes to abu mazen's transagainst or palestinian incitement, the obama administration remains reserved in its condemnation if it feigns the appearance of disapproval at all. for peace, abu mazen must recognize israel's right to exist as a jewish state. must renounce the use of violence, and put an end to the repeated rocket attacks and acts of terror and must sit down with israel to be an earnest partner for peace. abu mazen, who is currently in his 10th year of a five-year term, as the leader of the palestinian authority, is only interested in self-preservation and self-interest. the onus lies with abu mazen and the palestinian authority to to their obligations and previous diplomatic agreements. and if and when it doesn't, for won't

mr. speaker, last month i traveled to israel with more than 35 of my colleagues to meet with key leaders in that country, including prime minister netanyahu, and learned firsthand what our closest ally in the middle east thinks about the proposed iran nuclear agreement also known as the joint competitive plan of act -- comprehensive plan of action between the p5+1. the view across the political spectrum from the prime minister to the opposition leader in the can i knesset, from the president of the state of israel, to the military leaders and the israeli defense forces, they all agree that the deal negotiated by secretary kerry championed by president obama is a dangerous and historic mistake. this confirms what we have learned in briefings and hearings in congress. this deal will not deliver the safety and security the american people deserve. instead, it will transform iran from the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism within illicit nuclear program into the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism awash in billions of dollars in sanctions relief with an internationally sanctioned nuclear program on an industrial scale. but this

mr. mccarthy: it was bipartisan. a couple days where we had democrats and republicans together. in israel it was bipartisan. we met from prime minister benjamin netanyahu down to those who are in different parties. one uniting factor around all of them. all of them were opposed to this iran agreement. you look at the poll to the american public. more than 2-1 from those that support to those that oppose it. a latest pew poll found that only 2% of the americans have a great deal of confidence that iran's leader will abide by the agreement. this is more than just an agreement with iran. it will affect the entire world in the nuclear race. this is not something that should be taken lightly. it's probably one of the most serious votes we'll ever take. we ask every member from both sides of the aisle to look, study and listen and have the courage not to follow a political conviction but a conviction about marek and where the world will take us. >> there's strong and growing bipartisan opposition to this deal with iran. the president has laid out an agreement that ultimately that will lead iran to a nuclear weapon if they comply with all of the tenants of th

mr. ellison. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for three minutes. i'd like to thank the gentleman for yielding. in 2012, prime minister of israel, minister netanyahu, went to the u.n. with a graph. much like the one right beside me. it was a picture of a bomb with a red line and the prime minister said, the red line must be drawn on iran's nuclear enrichment program. this deal does that. today, we can say that iran cannot produce or stockpile highly enriched uranium and it has to get rid of 98% of the low enriched uranium. to make sure that they don't achieve a nuclear weapon, we have the strictest inspection regime in the history of nuclear agreements. the impetus for the two years of negotiation has been achieved. so what's the problem? the gears of war have been halted when we prove that negotiation and diplomacy are the best methods of achieving peace. this deal is a triumph of diplomacy over military conflict. it's a win for those who reject the misconception that diplomacy is weakness. in 2003, vice president chaney -- cheney said i have been charged by the president with making sure that none of the tyrannies of the world are negotiating --

mr. kimball that the israeli prime minister has been to the other five countries and adjust their congress in reference to stopping this deal? to my knowledge, prime minister netanyahuas not gone to the parliaments of the other countries. he has met with the leaders of these other countries involved in the negotiations. what he was clearly trying to do this year was to influence congressional opinion against the agreements. he felt he had the ability to try to do that. ofre has not been the kind debate in germany, france, or the u.k., russia, china certainly, that we have had here about the agreement, in part because all parts of the political spectrum in our three european allies have been in support of this. because they see this as the best possible outcome to prevent iran from getting a nuclear weapon. aboutally, i am puzzled prime minister netanyahu's approach. it is not consistent with all of his military and security leaders. some of whom reluctantly think this is the best possible outcome to prevent iran from getting nuclear weapons. the disagreements were between prime minister netanyahu and president obama in the past, i think it is important they get over

mr. ellison. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for three minutes. i'd like to thank the gentleman for yielding. in 2012, prime minister of israel, minister netanyahu, went to the u.n. with a graph. much like the one right beside me. it was a picture of a bomb with a red line and the prime minister said, the red line must be drawn on iran's nuclear enrichment program. this deal does that. today, we can say that iran cannot produce or stockpile highly enriched uranium and it has to get rid of 98% of the low enriched uranium. to make sure that they don't achieve a nuclear weapon, we have the strictest inspection regime in the history of nuclear agreements. the impetus for the two years of negotiation has been achieved. so what's the problem? the gears of war have been halted when we prove that negotiation and diplomacy are the best methods of achieving peace. this deal is a triumph of diplomacy over military conflict. it's a win for those who reject the misconception that diplomacy is weakness. in 2003, vice president chaney -- cheney said i have been charged by the president with making sure that none of the tyrannies of the world are negotiating --