mr. newsom because mr. wsom had just started the same-sex marriage process, with what appeared at that time to be legal authority. mr. obama, in the thoughtful election, he's evolved and gotten there to where now it clearly is the most significant change most of us have seen in the last six, seven, eight or nine years. >> now, jonathan, you jump in here on the other three. we're looking at gun control, some sort of grand bargain on the economy, with fiscal policy and taxes and spending thrown in, and we're looking for my standard -- maybe i'm tougher than most people on the liberal side -- i want to see a real workable, sustainable, enforceable immigration policy we're proud of and we wish to enforce. i want something really done. not another simpson/mazzoli disaster of 20 years ago. >> things are changing around in the last few days, couple weeks, the notorious agenda, budget, immigration and guns. what he did on the budget is in introducing his budget, he basely called the bluff of the republicans. they di

. >> bill: but newsom republicans are saying mrs. clinton mislead everybody. >> i don't know what her eyes saw but i do know that her signature is on some of the denials of those requests and what we know for certain is that some of these requests did not end with the security folks in the state department. they went higher up into the management levels. >> bill: all right, denial for the requests were the requests for more security in libya because the as i diplomats there felt in danger. joining us now from d.c. to sort it all out chief washington correspondent james rosen. what's the truth here rosen? we haven't seen the memo that the former secretary of state allegedly signed, right? nobody -- that's not out in the public at all, correct? >> that's not in the public domain. the republican committees that prepared this report on benghazi this week did see this april 192012 cable. which they say was signed by secretary clinton rejecting more requests for security for greater security in benghazi. we know thorn berry is telling the

mr. allen was murdered. as of 2008 his murderer was still unknown. at that time in 2008 mayor newsom approved awards up to $250,000 for this case and along with additional 15 murder cases. the police department and the da both affirm that the individual who we're requesting receive this award came forward recently and provided information for the arrest of the suspect responsible for the murder and testified in the prosecution in the case and lead to the suspect's ultimate plea and we are supporting this award by the da office. generally of awards of this type the administrative code allows the mayor to authorize the award up to $100,000 and most cases by the mayor and notified to the public and this is a large award. in order to do an an award greater than $100,000 and confirm the payment to the individual and why it's before you today. there is no general fund impact to making the award and it will be paid through the police department through their existing budget. i am happy to answer any questions that you have. >> thank you. any questions? >> i have a question. do you know how

mr. allen was murdered. as of 2008 his murderer was still unknown. at that time in 2008 mayor newsom approved awards up to $250,000 for this case and along with additional 15 murder cases. the police department and the da both affirm that

mr. chair. colleagues, i want to thank the gao committee for their recommendation of this item and appreciate your consideration. three years ago i was happy to work with mayor newsome to pass our city's first open data ordinance and at that point we were a national leader in the open data movement. unfortunately we have fallen a bit behind. at this time we have about 500 city maintained data sets, but there are literally thousands of data sets that we could put out to the public. we have known in recent years that the release of government data and improved partnership between government and citizens has led to many successes at improving government. we know this is good for open government. this is to help provide more information to the press, to the public, and really ensure that as we analyze our government data, this is leading to innovations throughout our communities. i want to just take a moment because some of our colleagues have asked me, what type of data are we talking about? let me give three examples of things that i think we could really move forward on. first has to do with rec and park. four years ago the very first meeting i had with now director