mr. nunez. >> good to be with you. kristen: i have been looking at some polls that i imagine are worrisome for the newsom camp. in july, a survey showed 40% of latinos were inclined recall the governor. is governor newsom showing weakness with latinos? >> really he isn't. part of the problem is when you get into the polling that has happened during a special election, the people you poll 10 to be people that are likely voters that will vote in every single election. if you do that, you end up cutting a huge percentage of young voters. latinos make up the youngest population of voters. in california, you have about 25% of the voter base is latino and steep percent of those are young people under the age of 23, between 18 and 23. what that says is a lot of young people don't end up in polls. i think governor newsom enjoys solid support from the latino community. it just so happens that the polls we are looking at are not capturing that support. on election day, you will see the poll that matters

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. buchanan votes aye. mr. smith of nebraska? mr. smith of nebraska votes aye. mr. reed? mr. reed votes aye. mr. kelly votes aye. mr. smith of missouri votes aye. mr. rice votes aye. mr. schweikert. mr. schweikert. ms. walorski votes aye. mr. lahood votes yes. dr. wenstrup yes. mr. arrington votes yes. dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. estes votes yes. >> mr. estes votes yes. >> mr. estes votes yes. mr. smucker votes aye. >> aye. >> mr. smucker votes aye. mr. hern votes aye. mrs. miller votes aye. mr. higgins? mr. higgins votes no. mr. chairman? mr. chairman votes no. chair neal: the clerk will tally the vote. >> i have 25 no's and 18 ayes. chair neal: is there anyone who wishes to present an amendment? >> mr. chairman, i have a point of order. chair neal: you will await the gentleman's from pennsylvania's amendment. [indistinct conversations] the gentleman is recognized to speak on his amendment. rep. smucker: thank you, mr. chairman. this bill we are considering today, this section is part of an agenda that represents the latest attack i

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. buchanan votes yes. mr. smith of nebraska? mr. smith of nebraska votes yes. mr. reed? mr. reed votes yes. mr. kelly? mr. kelly votes yes. mr. smith of missouri? mr. smith of missouri? mr. wright? wright votes yes. mr. schweikert? mr. schweikert votes yes. -- mr. lahood? mr. lahood votes aye. dr. winthrop -- wenstrup? dr. wenstrup? dr. wenstrup votes yes. mr. arrington? mr. arrington votes yes. dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. estes votes yes. mr. smoker votes -- smucker votes aye. misses miller votes aye. mr. kind votes no. mr. chairman? mr. chairman votes no. >> the clerk will report the tally. >> i have 25 nays, 18 ayes. >> the amendment fails. are there any amendments to the nature of the amendment and the subject? >> mr. chairman, i have an amendment. >> gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. thompson. he has reserved a point of order and as we pass out the amendment, he will then be recognized. the gentleman is recognized. >> thank you, this would stop the democrats hasty proposal to supercharge the irs without oversight, that is why wh

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. buchanan votes aye. mr. smith of nebraska? mr. smith of nebraska votes aye. mr. reed? mr. reed votes aye. mr. kelly votes aye. mr. smith of missouri votes aye. mr. rice votes aye. mr. schweikert. mr. schweikert. ms. walorski votes aye. mr. lahood votes yes. dr. wenstrup yes. mr. arrington votes yes. dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. estes votes yes. >> mr. estes votes yes. >> mr. estes votes yes. mr. smucker votes aye. >> aye. >> mr. smucker votes aye. mr. hern votes aye. mrs. miller votes aye. mr. higgins? mr. higgins votes no. mr. chairman? mr. chairman votes no. chair neal: the clerk will tally the vote. >> i have 25 no's and 18 ayes. chair neal: is there anyone who wishes to present an amendment? >> mr. chairman, i have a point of order. chair neal: you will await the gentleman's from pennsylvania's amendment. [indistinct conversations] the gentleman is recognized to speak on his amendment. rep. smucker: thank you, mr. chairman. this bill we are considering today, this section is part of an agenda that represents the latest attack i

>> no. >> mr. -- votes no. >> brady echo -- brady? >> aye. >> nunez? >> aye. >> buchanan? > aye. >> mr. smith of nebraska? mr. smith of nebraska? mr. reed? >> aye. >> mr. kelly echo -- mr. kelly? >> aye. >> smith of missouri? >> aye. >> mr. wright's -- rice? mr. schweigert? >> aye. mr. lahood? mr. lahood votes yes. dr. wenstrup? >> yes. >> mr. arrington? >> aye. dr. ferguson? dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. schmucker? mr. hearn? >> aye. >> ms. miller? >> aye. >> mr. smith of nebraska? mr. rice? mr. smith of nebraska? mr. smith of nebraska votes yes. mr. chairman? >> no. >> mr. chairman votes no. >> the court will report the tally. >> 25 nay. >> the amendment fails. are there any other amendments including the amendment and nature of substitute? mr. thompson? >> i reserve a point of order. as soon as mr. schweigert's amendment is passed out we will proceed. >> the gentleman is recognized. >> i understand we all have a passion and frustration on the pricing of pharmaceuticals. we may have different ways to approach it and i wish we had a functional congress and the ability for us

mr. nunez? mr. buchanan? mr. smith of nebraska? mr. reed? mr. kelly? mr. smith of missouri? mr. rice? mr. schweikert? miss velour ski -- were lower ski -- walorski? mr. arrington? dr. ferguson? mr. smucker? mr. hearn? misses miller? mr. beter? mr. gomez? ms. plaskett? >> hold on a second. mr. chair? >> yes? >> how has plaskett voted? >> she has not. >> mr. chair, is it possible to have her recorded as no? >> yes, entirely possible. [laughter] >> mr. rice? mr. chairman? >> no. >> mr. chairman votes no. >> the clerk will report the tally. 25 no's in 17 ayes. >> the amendment fails. are there any limits to the amendment of nature of substitute? mr. schweikert? mr. thompson? >> i reserve a point of order. >> mr. schweikert will be recognized as soon as the amendment is done. the gentleman is recognize. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i feel slightly guilty for the small tree we killed on this amendment. personally, and i know a couple of the conversations i have had on the side with members here from both sides, there is a discomfort in the part of the conversation we have been having a

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. buchanan votes aye. mr. smith of nebraska votes mr. reed mr. kelly votes aye. mr. smith of missouri votes aye. mr. rice votes aye. mr. schweitzer votes yes. miss will or ski votes aye. mr. lahood, votes yes. dr. votes yes. mr. arrington votes yes. dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. estes votes yes. mr. smucker, votes pres. biden: aye. mr. hearn votes aye. misses miller votes aye. ms. delvenne no no votes. mr. chairman votes no. >> the clerk will tally the vote. >> i have 25 no's and 18 ayes. >> the amendment fails. does any other member want to offer an amendment? >> mr. thompson? >>>> i reserve a point of order. >> and we will perceive -- proceed with passing of mr. smith's amendment. -- passing out mr. smith's amendment. i believe the amendment has been passed out and those of us working remotely have it in their inbox. the gentleman from missouri is invited to speak in his amendment. >> it is my firm belief that american families are the foundation of our country. republicans have made it clear that we put american families first. we share the same

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. b cannon votes aye. mr. smith of nebraska votes aye. mr. reed votes aye. mr. kelly votes aye. mr. smith of missouri votes aye. mr. rice votes aye. mr. schweikert votes aye. mr. will lower ski votes aye. mr. lahood votes aye. dr. when strip votes yes. mr. arrington votes yes. mr. ferguson votes yes. mr. smucker votes aye. >> would you turn your camera on? >> it is on. can you hear me? >> we can hear you, we would love to see you. it is on from my end. mr. hearn votes aye. misses miller votes aye. mr. chairman votes no. >> with the clerk report the tally. >> i have 25 nays and 18 ayes, the amendment fails. are there any amendments to the amendment and the substitute? >> i have an amendment at the desk. i reserve a point of order. >> mr. thompson has reserved a point of order. the gentleman will be recognized as the amendment is passed out. >> you can see me now? >> no, i cannot proceed. you are good. >> thank you, mr. chairman. democrats spent the past few days talking about how to make the tax code fair. in typical fashion, many provisions of this bill appl

mr. nunez votes aye. mr. buchanan votes aye. mr. smith of nebraska votes aye. mr. reed votes aye.r. kelly -- mr. smith of missouri votes aye. mr. rice votes aye. mr. schweikert votes yes. ms. will or ski votes yes. mr. lahood votes yes. dr. when strip votes yes. mr. arrington votes yes. dr. ferguson votes yes. mr. estes votes yes. mr. smucker votes aye. mr. hearn votes aye. misses miller votes aye. ms. sewall votes no. mr. kelly votes yes. mr. chairman votes no. i have 25 nays and 18 ayes the amendment fails. or the amendment -- are there any more amendments to the nature of the substitute? mr. rice has an amendment to the desk. mr. thompson has reserved a point of order. the amendment will be passed out and the chairman will be recognized. the gentleman is recognized to proceed. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i have to reiterate i have said before and my colleagues have said it as well, this process is fatally flawed. it is rushed to the point of ridiculousness. it was designed to prevent the minority from being able to see the exact law until one day or two before this markup. i ha

mr. nunez? mr. noon as boats aye. mr. reed? votes aye. mr. rice? mr. rice? mr. schweikert? mr. schweikert boats yes. mr. lahood? dr. wenstrup? dr. wenstrup votes yes. mr. arrington? dr. ferguson? dr. ferguson boats yes. mr. moran? -- mr. hearn. ms. miller? misses miller votes aye. mr. chairman votes no. >> the clerk will report the tally. >> mr. chairman, i have 25 nays and 17 ayes. >> with 25 nays, the amendment fails. >> mr. chairman? >> i reserve a point of order. >> mr. thompson has reserved a point of order, while we pass out misses -- mr. rice's amendment. the gentleman will be recognized on his amendment. >> i have to pause for a moment, talking about the recovery from 2008, when there were threats from the obama biden administration thought would be a good idea to dramatically raise taxes, put development programs and raise regulations and the result of that was 10 years of stagnation, or eight years of stagnation for our economy, frustratingly slow recovery that should have been almost immediate. compare that to what happened in 2017 we conducted tax cuts -- [indiscern

the gentleman from california, mr. nunez is recognized on the amendment. >> thank you, mr.e the recognition. in the last few months most doctors and policymakers acknowledge the increasing likelihood that covid-19 originated from china's lab. although they seem to block the international investigators from accessing much of the direct evidence, at this point in time, all the circumstantial evidence points to a lab leak, as none of the evidence indicates that it was from animals. it's a coincidence that the lab engaged in the function research that involved the generic viruses to make them more transmissible or lethal. while it could have legitimate purposes [inaudible] the potential application and the research [inaudible] as the covid-19 wreaks havoc on the world economy and on human lives, we need to consider whether the research is worth the risk but it's clear no entity should be gaining the research by the regime's like china, russia and iran. we don't have normal relations in the regime's because they can't be trusted and they undermine the interests. the intellectual

mr. kolman near the belt buckle. >> reporter: did you test this dna against gilberto nunez? >> yes.t his. >> reporter: no match? >> no match. >> reporter: where do you go from there? i mean, that is a -- >> that's a show-stopper. nothing moves in this investigation unless we can determine who that is. >> an unknown john doe. and that's a problem for me. >> reporter: holley carnright is the ulster county district attorney. >> i said, "well, we're not going to go forward with any indictment, we're not going to go forward with any arrest until i have the answer to that. investigators collected d-n-a samples from all the first responders to see if they could have accidentally left their dan dna at the scene. and they considered another possibility that the dna belonged to an accomplice. >> we were also trying to get samples from people we had identified that were close to nunez. that's a little trickier -- because you just can't walk up and ask for the dna. we call it cast-off dna. and you would conduct a surveillance of those individuals and wait for them to discard an item that would