mr. o'boyle. this is a very nuanced topic. it can be eye glazingly complex, frankly. but at its heart, it goes to the question of whether broadband providers, as i understand it, ought to be able to charge different prices for differe speeds. why shouldn't a broadband provider be able to charge a, quote, data hog for using so bandwidth? >> broadband providers should be in the business of delivering to consumers the content that they're already paying for. they're paying subscribers and should be able to get to the web sites and services of their choice. that's the core of common carrier or so-called net neutrality protections and it's actually core to the way the internet functions. this has nothing to do with the so-called utility star regulation and everything to do with consumer protection. >> and scott, i know you disagree with some of that. take the other side. >> well net neutrality is something people enjoy today. businesses do not have an interest in blocking or throttling. what the problem is applying utility regulation to something that's not a utility. this